Is the Concept of ‘Natural Capital’ Useful?
With growing political momentum and a keen enthusiasm to engage business and finance in environmental management, it is useful to review the merits and pitfalls of a ‘natural capital’ approach to ensure that a sensible trajectory is being pursued. Outlined in this chapter are some recommendations for a nuanced approach to the conceptualisation of ‘natural capital’ which takes into account the benefits and potential risks.
- 1.DEFRA. 2013. Payments for ecosystem services: A best practice guide. Annex-Case studies. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/200901/pb13932a-pes-bestpractice-annexa-20130522.pdf
- 2.DEFRA. 2018. A green future: Our 25 year plan to improve the environment. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/693158/25-year-environment-plan.pdf
- 3.Futerra. 2015. Branding biodiversity – The new nature message. Futerra sustainability communications. http://www.wearefuterra.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Branding_Biodiversity.pdf. Accessed 27 Feb 17.
- 4.SEEA. 2017. The system of environmental-economic accounting (SEEA). Experimental ecosystem accounting briefing paper. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/workshops/int_seminar/note.pdf. Accessed 27 Jan 17.
- 5.World Forum on Natural Capital. 2015. http://naturalcapitalforum.com/about/