Advertisement

Learning Mathematical Practices to Connect Abstract Algebra to High School Algebra

  • Erin E. BaldingerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Research in Mathematics Education book series (RME)

Abstract

Making connections between advanced mathematical content, such as abstract algebra, and the mathematics of the school curriculum is a critical component of the mathematical education of future secondary teachers. In this chapter, I argue that engagement in mathematical practices (e.g., constructing arguments, attending to precision) can serve as a link for preservice teachers from their study of abstract algebra to the content they will teach as high school teachers. Using a multiple case study approach, I describe how four preservice teachers had opportunities to learn to engage in mathematical practices in their abstract algebra course. Participants were taking an abstract algebra course specifically designed for future teachers. Data sources include video records from the abstract algebra course and problem-solving interviews with each participant before and after the course. Each participant showed improvement in their mathematical practice engagement and reflected on how valuable a focus on mathematical practices would be in their teaching. These findings demonstrate the key role that mathematical practices play in the preparation of future teachers. There are valuable implications for the design of content courses for teachers and for the ongoing research into connections between advanced mathematics and the school curriculum.

Keywords

Mathematical practices Problem-solving interviews Abstract algebra course for teachers 

References

  1. Baldinger, E. E. (2014). Opportunities to develop mathematical knowledge for teaching in a math content course (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, D. L. (Ed.). (2003). Teaching and learning mathematical practices. In Mathematical proficiency for all students: Toward a strategic research and development program in mathematics education (pp. 29–41). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar
  3. Bass, H. (2011). A vignette of doing mathematics: A meta-cognitive tour of the production of some elementary mathematics. Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 8(1&2), 3–34.Google Scholar
  4. Burton, L. (1999). The practices of mathematicians: What do they tell us about coming to know mathematics? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37(2), 121–143.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3483312 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cobb, P., & Bowers, J. (1999). Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cuoco, A., Goldenberg, E. P., & Mark, J. (1996). Habits of mind: An organizing principle for mathematics curricula. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15(4), 375–402.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(96)90023-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87(3).  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ginsburg, H. P. (1981). The clinical interview in psychology research on mathematical thinking: Aims, rationales, techniques. For the Learning of Mathematics, 1(3), 4–11.Google Scholar
  9. Goldin, G. A. (1997). Chapter 4: Observing mathematical problem solving through task-based interviews. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Monograph, 9(1997), 40–62.  https://doi.org/10.2307/749946 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goulding, M., Hatch, G., & Rodd, M. (2003). Undergraduate mathematics experience: its significance in secondary mathematics teacher preparation. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 361–393.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026362813351 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Graham, K. J., Li, Y., & Buck, J. C. (2000). Characteristics of mathematics teacher preparation programs in the United States: An exploratory study. Mathematics Educator, 5(1/2), 5–31.Google Scholar
  12. Hodge, A. M., Gerberry, C. V., Moss, E. R., & Staples, M. E. (2010). Purposes and perceptions: What do university mathematics professors see as their role in the education of secondary mathematics teachers? PRIMUS: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 20(8), 646–663.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970902810733 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Katz, V. J., & Barton, B. (2007). Stages in the history of algebra with implications for teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, 185–201.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9023-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Knuth, E. J. (2002a). Secondary school mathematics teachers’ conceptions of proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 379–405.  https://doi.org/10.2307/4149959 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Knuth, E. J. (2002b). Teachers’ conceptions of proof in the context of secondary school mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5, 61–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lakatos, I. (1976). In J. Worrall & E. Zahar (Eds.), Proofs and refutations. UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Larsen, S. P., & Zandieh, M. (2007). Proofs and refutations in the undergraduate mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 205–216.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9106-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Moschkovich, J. N. (2004). Appropriating mathematical practices: A case study of learning to use and explore functions through interaction with a tutor. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 55(1–3), 49–80.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000017691.13428.b9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moschkovich, J. N. (2013). Issues regarding the concept of mathematical practices. In Y. Li & J. N. Moschkovich (Eds.), Proficiency and Beliefs in Learning and Teaching (pp. 257–275). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Murray, E., Baldinger, E. E., Wasserman, N. H., Broderick, S., & White, D. (2017). Connecting advanced and secondary mathematics. Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers, 1(August), 1–10.Google Scholar
  23. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  24. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Author.Google Scholar
  25. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, & Council of Chief State School Officers.Google Scholar
  26. Novotná, J., & Hoch, M. (2008). How structure sense for algebraic expressions or equations is related to structure sense for abstract algebra. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(2), 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pólya, G. (1957). How to solve it (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Silver, E. A., Clark, L. M., Ghousseini, H. N., Charalambous, C. Y., & Sealy, J. T. (2007). Where is the mathematics? Examining teachers’ mathematical learning opportunities in practice-based professional learning tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(4–6), 261–277.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9039-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Simon, M. A. (1994). Learning mathematics and learning to teach: Learning cycles in mathematics teacher education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26(1), 71–94.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Speer, N. M., Smith III, J. P., & Horvath, A. (2010). Collegiate mathematics teaching: An unexamined practice. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 29(2), 99–114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2010.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Staples, M. E., Bartlo, J., & Thanheiser, E. (2012). Justification as a teaching and learning practice: Its (potential) multifaceted role in middle grades mathematics classrooms. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(4), 447–462.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2012.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stylianides, A. J., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Understanding and describing mathematical knowledge for teaching: knowledge about proof for engaging students in the activity of proving. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(4), 307–332.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-008-9077-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stylianides, G. J., Stylianides, A. J., & Philippou, G. N. (2007). Preservice teachers’ knowledge of proof by mathematical induction. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(3), 145–166.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9034-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tabach, M., Levenson, E., Barkai, R., Tsamir, P., Tirosh, D., & Dreyfus, T. (2011). Secondary teachers’ knowledge of elementary number theory proofs: the case of general-cover proofs. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(6), 465–481.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9185-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Taylor, K. L., & Dionne, J.-P. (2000). Accessing problem-solving strategy knowledge: The complementary use of concurrent verbal protocols and retrospective debriefing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 413–425.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.92.3.413 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. TEDS-M International Study Center. (2010). Released Items: Future teacher mathematics content knowledge and mathematics pedagogical content knowledge - secondary. MI: East Lansing.Google Scholar
  38. Usiskin, Z. (1988). Conceptions of school algebra and uses of variables. In A. F. Coxford & A. P. Shulte (Eds.), The Ideas of Algebra, K-12 (pp. 8–19). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  39. Wasserman, N. H. (2016). Abstract algebra for algebra teaching: Influencing school mathematics instruction. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(1), 28–47.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2015.1093200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Curriculum and Instruction, College of Education and Human DevelopmentUniversity of MinnesotaSaint PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations