Advertisement

Dallas Willard: Reviving Realism on the West Coast

  • Micah D. Tillman
Chapter
Part of the Contributions To Phenomenology book series (CTPH, volume 100)

Abstract

This article examines the philosophical work of Dallas Willard (1935–2013), Emeritus Professor of Philosophy at the University of Southern California. After outlining his major translations, it explores four of Willard’s central theses: (1) that Husserl’s phenomenology of knowledge solved a fundamental puzzle about the objectivity of knowledge; (2) that the success of Husserlian phenomenology’s account of knowledge depended upon Husserl’s ontological insights; (3) that Husserl was already a phenomenologist when Frege was purportedly converting him from psychologism; and (4) that Husserl maintained his early account of knowledge—and thus his realism—throughout his career. Though Willard was instrumental in starting the “Early” or “Realist Phenomenology” movement in America, his philosophical contributions have yet to be fully explored. Therefore, the paper concludes with a guide to those who would like to understand and develop Willard’s work further.

Keywords

Willard, Dallas Husserl, Edmund Realism Realist phenomenology Early phenomenology Knowledge 

References

  1. Baltzer-Jaray, Kimberly. 2013. In Memory of Dallas Willard. NASEPblog: Official Blog of The North American Society for Early Phenomenology. 8 May 2013. https://nasepblog.wordpress.com/2013/05/08/in-memory-of-dallas-willard/. Accessed 5 July 2018.
  2. Bell, Susan. 2013. In Memoriam Dallas Willard, 77. USC Dornsife News. 10 May 2013. http://dornsife.usc.edu/news/stories/1401/in-memoriam-dallas-willard-77. Accessed 5 July 2018.
  3. Card, Claudia, Terrence Penner, Marcus G. Singer, and Robert G. Turnbull. 1998. William Henry Hay 1917–1997. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 71: 5144–5147.Google Scholar
  4. Husserl, Edmund. 1970/2001. Logical Investigations. Trans. J.N. Findlay. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd. (1970); New York: Routledge (2001).Google Scholar
  5. ———. 1972a. On the Concept of Number. Trans. D. Willard. In Phenomenology and Existentialism, ed. Solomon, 60–61.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 1972b. Logical Investigations: Forward. Trans. D. Willard. In Phenomenology and Existentialism, ed. Solomon, 61–62.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 1972c. Logical Investigations: Psychologism. Trans. D. Willard. In Phenomenology and Existentialism, Solomon, 62–95.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 1972d. Edmund Husserl, “A Reply to a Critic of My Refutation of Logical Psychologism”. Trans. D. Willard. The Personalist 53(1): 5–13.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 1972e/1973. On the Concept of Number: Psychological Analyses. Trans. D. Willard. Philosophica Mathematica 9(1): 40–52. and 10, no. 1: 37–87.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 1977. Psychological Studies in the Elements of Logic. Trans. D. Willard. The Personalist 58(4): 295–320.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 1978. Review of Ernst Schroeder’s Vorlesungen ueber die Algebra der Logik. Trans. D. Willard. The Personalist 59(2): 115–143.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 1979a. The Deductive Calculus and the Logic of Contents. Trans. D. Willard. The Personalist 60(1): 1–25.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 1979b. A. Voigt’s ‘Elementary Logic’, in Relation to My Statements on the Logic of the Logical Calculus. Trans. D. Willard. The Personalist 60(1): 26–35.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 1994. Collected Works, vol. 5, Early Writings in the Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics. Trans. D. Willard. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 2003. Collected Works, vol. 10, Philosophy of Arithmetic: Psychological and Logical Investigations with Supplementary Texts from 1887–1901. Trans. D. Willard. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Jesson, Greg. 2014. The Husserlian Roots of Dallas Willard’s Philosophical and Theological Works: Knowledge of the Temporal and the Eternal. Philosophia Christi 16 (1): 7–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McCormick, Peter, and Frederick Elliston, eds. 1981. Husserl: Shorter Works. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  18. Reinach, Adolf. 1969. Concerning Phenomenology. Trans. D. Willard. The Personalist 50(2): 194–221.Google Scholar
  19. Sokolowski, Robert. 1964. The Formation of Husserl’s Concept of Constitution, Phaenomenologica 18. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  20. Solomon, Robert C. 1972/2001. Phenomenology and Existentialism. New York: Harper and Row (1972); Rowman & Littlefield (2001).Google Scholar
  21. Tillman, Micah D. 2012a. Husserl’s Genetic Philosophy of Arithmetic: An Alternative Reading. American Dialectic 2 (2): 141–190 http://www.americandialectic.org/volume-ii-2012/v2n2/husserls-genetic-philosophy-of-arithmetic/. Accessed 5 July 2018.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 2012b. Husserl’s Mereological Semiotics: Indication, Expression, Surrogation. The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 12: 69–108.Google Scholar
  23. Willard, Dallas. 1964. Meaning and Universals in Husserl’s ‘Logische Untersuchungen’. PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin–Madison.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 1972. The Paradox of Logical Psychologism: Husserl’s Way Out. American Philosophical Quarterly 9 (1): 94–100.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 1979. Husserl’s Critique of Extensional Logic: ‘A Logic that Does Not Understand Itself’. Idealistic Studies 9 (2): 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. ———. 1980. Husserl on a Logic That Failed. The Philosophical Review 89 (1): 46–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. ———. 1982. Wholes, Parts and the Objectivity of Knowledge. In Parts and Moments: Studies in Logic and Formal Ontology, ed. Barry Smith, 379–400. München: Philosophia Verlag.Google Scholar
  28. ———. 1984. Logic and the Objectivity of Knowledge: A Study in Husserl’s Philosophy. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  29. ———. 1988. A Critical Study of Husserl and Intentionality. The Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 19 (2): 186–198 & no. 3: 311–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. ———. 1989a. Review of Josef Seifert, Back to Things in Themselves: A Phenomenological Foundation for Classical Realism (New York: Routledge Chapman & Hall, 1987). Canadian Philosophical Reviews/Revue Canadienne de Comptes rendus en Philosophie 9 (2): 66–69.Google Scholar
  31. ———. 1989b. Space, Color, Sense Perception and the Epistemology of Logic. The Monist 72 (1): 117–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. ———. 1991. Attaining Objectivity: Phenomenological Reduction and the Private Language Argument. In Topics in Philosophy and Artificial Intelligence, ed. Liliana Albertazzi and Roberto Poli, 15–21. Bozen: Istituto Mitteleuropeo di Cultura.Google Scholar
  33. ———. 1992. Finding the Noema. In Phenomenology of the Noema, ed. John J. Drummond and Lester Embree, 29–47. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. ———. 1994a. Mereological Essentialism Restricted. Axiomathes 5 (1): 123–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. ———. 1994b. The Integrity of the Mental Act: Husserlian Reflections on a Fregian Problem. In Mind, Meaning and Mathematics, ed. Leila Haaparanta, 235–262. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. ———. 1994c. Translator’s Introduction. In Early Writings in the Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics, ed. Husserl, vii–xlviii. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. ———. 1995a. Is Derrida’s View of Ideal Being Rationally Defensible? In Derrida and phenomenology, ed. William R. McKenna and Jean-Claude Evans, 23–41. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. ———. 1995b. Knowledge. In The Cambridge Companion to Husserl, ed. Barry Smith and David Woodruff Smith, 138–167. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. ———. 1995c. Phenomenology and Metaphysics. Presented at the APA Symposium “Husserl’s Ontology”, San Francisco, 30 March 1995. http://old.dwillard.org/articles/artview.asp?artID=77. Accessed 5 July 2018.
  40. ———. 2000. The Significance of Husserl’s Logical Investigations. Presented to The Society for the Study of Husserl’s Philosophy at the American Philosophical Association, Albuquerque, NM. 7 April 2000. http://old.dwillard.org/articles/artview.asp?artID=60. Accessed 5 July 2018.
  41. ———. 2002. How Reason Can Survive the Modern University: The Moral Foundations of Rationality. In Faith, Scholarship, and Culture in the 21st Century, ed. Alice Ramos and Marie I. George, 181–191. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
  42. ———. 2003a. A Realist Analysis of the Relationship between Logic and Experience. Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy 22 (1): 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. ———. 2003b. The Theory of Wholes and Parts and Husserl’s Explication of the Possibility of Knowledge in the Logical Investigations. In Husserl’s ‘Logical Investigations’ Reconsidered, ed. Denis Fisette, 163–182. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. ———. 2003c. Translator’s Introduction. In Philosophy of Arithmetic, ed. Husserl, xiii–lxiv.Google Scholar
  45. ———. 2006. Moral Rights, Moral Responsibility, and the Contemporary Failure of Moral Knowledge. In Guantanamo Bay and the Judicial-Moral Treatment of the Other, ed. Clark Butler, 161–178. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
  46. ———. 2008. How Naturalism Makes Knowledge of Knowledge Impossible and Thereby Destroys the Possibility of a Rational Moral Existence for Humanity: A Critique of Naturalism in Husserl’s The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology”. Presented at the California Phenomenology Circle, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. 4 April 2008. http://old.dwillard.org/articles/artview.asp?artID=162. Accessed 5 July 2018.
  47. ———. 2010. In Phenomenology and Mathetics, Phaenomenologica 195, ed. Mirja Hartimo. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  48. ———. 2012. Realism Sustained?: Interpreting Husserl’s Progression into Idealism. Questiones Disputatae 3 (1): 20–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Micah D. Tillman
    • 1
  1. 1.Stanford Online High SchoolStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations