Advertisement

The Digitally Distributed Curriculum

  • Bill Johnston
  • Sheila MacNeill
  • Keith Smyth
Chapter
Part of the Digital Education and Learning book series (DEAL)

Abstract

This chapter draws on ideas from Chap.  7, highlights the notion of digitally distributed curriculum described in Chap.  3, expands the conceptual scope to encompass a set of values for developing the digital university, and describes a number of enabling factors for such development. The idea of ‘third space thinking’ (Oldenburg 1989) is deployed to conceptualise the nature and potential development of curriculum. Current thinking on curriculum is reviewed, including critiques of boundedness, product orientation, modularisation, institutional silos, and assessment. The proposition that curriculum should support open education and address wider societal needs is emphasised. A key aspect is the detailed presentation and discussion of the concept of digitally distributed curriculum, which offers a method to visualise the digital university in terms of a curriculum shaped and enabled by porosity, open scholarship, co-location, co-production, praxis, public pedagogy, and participation. In its fullest development, this concept offers a means to portray the digital university as part of a project to reform higher education as public good.

References

  1. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University (4th ed.). Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bovill, C. (2013). Students and Staff Co-creating Curricula – A New Trend or an Old Idea We Never Got Around to Implementing? In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving Student Learning Through Research and Scholarship: 20 Years of ISL (pp. 96–108). Oxford: The Oxford Centre for Staff and Educational Development.Google Scholar
  3. Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging Students as Partners in Learning and Teaching: A Guide for Faculty. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Cormier, D. (2008). Rhizomatic Education: Community as Curriculum. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 4(5). http://nsuworks.nova.edu/innovate/vol4/iss5/2. Last Accessed 24 Feb 2018.
  5. De Vita, G., & Case, P. (2003). Rethinking the Internationalisation Agenda in UK HE. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 27(4), 383–398.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877032000128082. Last Accessed 19 June 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dunedin, A. (2013). Finding a Way to Participate. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 1(1), 37–38. https://jpaap.napier.ac.uk/index.php/JPAAP/article/view/55/pdf. Last Accessed 19 June 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fotheringham, J., Strickland, K., & Aitchison, K. (2012). Curriculum: Directions, Decisions and Debate. The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. http://www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk/docs/publications/curriculum-directions-decisions-and-debate.pdf?sfvrsn=8. Last Accessed 24 Feb 2018.
  8. Freire, P. (1970, 2000). Pedagogy of the Oppressed: 30th Anniversary Edition. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  9. Fung, D. (2017). A Connected Curriculum for Higher Education. London: UCL Press.  https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781911576358. Last Accessed 24 Feb 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Giroux, H. A. (2000). Public Pedagogy and the Responsibility of Intellectuals: Youth, Littleton, and the Loss of Innocence. JAC, 20(1), 9–42.Google Scholar
  11. Gosper, M., & Ifenthaler, D. (2014). Curriculum Design for the Twenty-First Century Curriculum. In M. Gosper & D. Ifenthaler (Eds.), Curriculum Models for the 21st Century (pp. 1–16). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grundy, S. (1987). Curriculum: Product or Praxis? London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hall, R., & Smyth, K. (2016). Dismantling the Curriculum in Higher Education. Open Library of Humanities, 2(1).  https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.66. Last Accessed 24 Feb 2018.
  14. Kvale, S. (2007). Contradictions of Assessment for Learning in Institutions of Higher Learning. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking Assessment in HE: Learning for the Longer Term (pp. 57–71). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Macdonald, J. B. (1977). Value Bases and Issues for Curriculum. In A. Molnar & J. A. Zahorick (Eds.), Curriculum Theory (pp. 10–21). Washington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  16. MacNeill, S. (2016). Reframing Open in the Context of the digital university – Part 1. https://howsheilaseesit.blog/2016/04/14/reframing-open-in-the-context-of-the-digital-university-part-1-oer16/. Last Accessed 19 June 2018.
  17. MacNeill, S., & Johnston, B. (2012). A Conversation Around What It Means to Be a digital university (Parts 1 to 5). http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/sheilamacneill/2012/01/26/a-converstaion-around-what-it-means-to-be-a-digital-university/. Last Accessed 22 Nov 2016.
  18. Memarovic, N., Fels, S., Anacleto, J., Calderon, R., Gobbo, F., & Caroll, J. M. (2014). Rethinking Third Places: Contemporary Design with Technology. The Journal of Community Informatics, 10(3). http://ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/1048/1116. Last Accessed 03 June 2018.
  19. Morris, A. (2009). The Stretched Academy: The Learning Experience of Mature Students from Under-Represented Groups. In L. Bell, H. Stevenson, & M. Neary (Eds.), The Future of HE: Policy, Pedagogy and the Student Experience (pp. 99–111). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  20. Oldenburg, R. (1989). The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Bookstores, Bars, Hair Salons, and Other Hangouts at the Heart of a Community. New York: Marlowe and Company.Google Scholar
  21. Peters, M. A., Liu, T.-C., & Ondercin, D. J. (2012). The Pedagogy of the Open Society. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Preece, J. (2017). University Community Engagement and Lifelong Learning: The Porous University. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Print, M. (1993). Curriculum Development and Design. St. Leonards: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  24. Savin-Baden, M. (2008). Learning Spaces: Creating Opportunities for Knowledge Creation in Academic Life. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Schubert, W. M. (2010). Outside Curricula and Public Pedagogy. In J. A. Sandlin, B. D. Schultz, & J. Burdick (Eds.), Handbook of Public Pedagogy: Education and Learning Beyond Schooling (pp. 10–19). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Smith, M. K. (1996, 2000). Curriculum Theory and Practice. The Encyclopaedia of Informal Education. http://infed.org/mobi/curriculum-theory-and-practice/. Last Accessed 24 Feb 2018.
  27. Smyth, K. (2015). The ‘Bounded’ Curriculum? https://3eeducation.org/2015/08/24/the-bounded-curriculum/. Last Accessed 24 Feb 2018.
  28. Smyth, K. (2016). Reframing Open in the Context of the digital university – Part 2. https://3eeducation.org/2016/04/20/reframing-open-in-the-context-of-the-digital-university-part-2/. Last Accessed 19 June 2018.
  29. Smyth, K., MacNeill, S., & Johnston, B. (2015). Visioning the digital university – From Institutional Strategy to Academic Practice. Educational Developments, 16(2), 13–17. https://www.seda.ac.uk/resources/files/publications_191_Ed%20Devs%2016.2%20v1.pdf. Last Accessed 24 Feb 2018.
  30. Starratt, R. J. (2002). Community as Curriculum. In K. Leithwood & P. Hallinger (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration (pp. 321–348). London: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wall, G. (2015). Future Thinking: Imaginative Expectations for the Leaky University. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 3(1), 6–10.  https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v3i1.153. Last Accessed 24 Feb 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Welikala, T. (2011). Rethinking International HE Curriculum: Mapping the Research Landscape. Universitas 21. August 2011 Learning and Teaching Position Paper. http://www.universitas21.com/news/details/32/rethinking-international-higher-education-curriculum-mapping-the-research-landscape. Last Accessed 19 June 2018.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bill Johnston
    • 1
  • Sheila MacNeill
    • 2
  • Keith Smyth
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Psychological Science and HealthUniversity of StrathclydeGlasgowUK
  2. 2.Academic Quality and DevelopmentGlasgow Caledonian UniversityGlasgowUK
  3. 3.Learning and Teaching AcademyUniversity of the Highlands and IslandsInvernessUK

Personalised recommendations