Advertisement

The Digital University: An Impoverished Concept

  • Bill Johnston
  • Sheila MacNeill
  • Keith Smyth
Chapter
Part of the Digital Education and Learning book series (DEAL)

Abstract

This chapter examines a number of key commentators on the concept of the digital university and identifies the contradictory nature of the debate. The commentaries are sourced from government policies, scholarly analyses, management consultants and think tanks, and university mission statements. A pattern of partial and competing viewpoints emerges including positive and negative positions, practical proposals for implementing digital technologies, and critical analysis of the prospects for digital technologies in universities. An overall estimate of the state of debate suggests that current thinking is (i) disproportionally skewed in favour of neoliberal, managerialist, and technist perspectives and (ii) underdeveloped in the realms of pedagogical theory and organisational development practice. This estimate leads to the conclusion that the current account presents an impoverished concept of the digital university. Specific points from the commentary are deployed in later chapters.

References

  1. Bailey, M., & Freedman, D. (Eds.). (2011). The Assault on Universities, A Manifesto for Resistance. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barber, M., Donnely, K., & Rizvi, S. (2013). An Avalanche Is Coming: Higher Education and the Revolution Ahead. IPPR. https://www.ippr.org/publications/an-avalanche-is-coming-higher-education-and-the-revolution-ahead. Accessed 28 Apr 2018.
  3. Collini, S. (2017). Speaking of Universities. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Gibbs, A., Haskins, G., Hannon, P., & Robertson, I. (2012). Leading the Entrepreneurial University: Meeting the Entrepreneurial Development Needs of Higher Education (2009, Updated 2012). NCEE. http://eureka.sbs.ox.ac.uk/4861/.
  5. Holmwood, J. (2011). A Manifesto for the Public University. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  6. Luckin, R., Bligh, B., Manches, A., Ainsworth, S., Crook, C., & Noss, R. (2012). Decoding Learning: The Proof, Promise and Potential of Digital Education. NESTA. https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/decoding-learning/. Accessed 15 Feb 2017.
  7. McCluskey, F. B., & Winter, M. L. (2012). The Idea of the Digital University: Ancient Traditions, Disruptive Technologies and the Battle for the Soul of Higher Education. Policy Studies Organisation. Washington: Westphalia Press.Google Scholar
  8. Office of the Vice Provost Learning and Teaching. (2013). Better Teaching, Better Learning Agenda. Monash University.Google Scholar
  9. PWC. (2018). The 2018 Digital University Staying Relevant in the Digital Age. PWC. https://www.pwc.co.uk/assets/pdf/the-2018-digital-university-staying-relevant-in-the-digital-age.pdf. Accessed 21 Nov 2017.
  10. Selwyn, N. (2014). Digital Technology and the Contemporary University: Degrees of Digitization. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Walker, R., Voce, J., Swift, E., Ahmed, J., Jenkins, M., & Vincent, P. (2016). 2016 Survey of Technology Enhanced Learning for Higher Education in the UK. Oxford: UCISA. https://www.ucisa.ac.uk/tel/. Accessed 6 Oct 2017.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bill Johnston
    • 1
  • Sheila MacNeill
    • 2
  • Keith Smyth
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Psychological Science and HealthUniversity of StrathclydeGlasgowUK
  2. 2.Academic Quality and DevelopmentGlasgow Caledonian UniversityGlasgowUK
  3. 3.Learning and Teaching AcademyUniversity of the Highlands and IslandsInvernessUK

Personalised recommendations