Advertisement

Between Worlds: Bridging the Divide Between Method and Theory in Understanding the Ritual Use of Caves in Later Prehistory

  • Lindsey BüsterEmail author
  • Eugène Warmenbol
  • Dimitrij Mlekuž
Chapter

Abstract

Caves are unique and enigmatic places, quite unlike other types of archaeological site. Sitting between worlds—between the above-ground world of the living and the underworld of gods and ancestors—they have always attracted specific kinds of activities in which the power and fabric of the spaces themselves are integral, not least in the prehistoric past. Caves therefore demand bespoke theoretical and methodological frameworks through which we might better understand their complex biographies and natural forces. In this, they provide opportunities as well as challenges: to explore new technologies and new collaborations which showcase these dynamic spaces to their full; technologies and collaborations which consider not just the static and the visual but the ever-changing and the intangible. Between Worlds is a call to arms. As a marriage of papers on dynamic theoretical frameworks and innovative digital capture technologies, it presents the latest research in cave archaeology and the ways in which multi-disciplinary perspectives are illuminating new ways of understanding these enigmatic places and the prehistoric communities that interacted with them.

Keywords

Caves Prehistory Theoretical frameworks Digital capture technologies Rituals Intangible Dynamic 

References

  1. Bersgvik, K. A., & Dowd, M. (Eds.). (2018). Caves & ritual in Medieval Europe, AD 500–1500. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
  2. Bergsvik, K. A., & Skeates, R. (2012). Caves in context: The cultural significance of caves and rockshelters in Europe. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
  3. Dowd, M. (2015). The archaeology of caves in Ireland. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
  4. Dowd, M. (2016). Underground archaeology. Oxford: Owbow Books.Google Scholar
  5. Dowd, M., & Hensey, R. (Eds.). (2016). The archaeology of darkness. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
  6. Fazenda, B. M., Scarre, C., Till, R., Pasalodos, R. J., Guerra, M. R., Tejedor, C., Peredo, R. O., Watson, A., Wyatt, S., Benito, C. G., Drinkall, H., & Foulds, F. (2017). Cave acoustics in prehistory: Exploring the association of Palaeolithic visual motifs and acoustic response. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(3), 1332–1349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Montello, D. R., & Moyes, H. (2012). Why dark zones are sacred: Turning to behavioral and cognitive science for answers. In H. Moyes (Ed.), Sacred darkness: A global perspective on the ritual use of caves (pp. 385–398). Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
  8. Moyes, H. (Ed.). (2012). Sacred darkness: A global perspective on the ritual use of caves. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
  9. Pettitt, P. (2016). Darkness visible. Shadows, art and the ritual experience of caves in Upper Palaeolithic Europe. In M. Dowd & R. Hensey (Eds.), The archaeology of darkness (pp. 11–23). Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
  10. Reznikoff, I. (2008). Sound resonance in prehistoric times: A study of Paleolithic painted caves and rocks. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(5), 4137–4141.Google Scholar
  11. Waller, S. (1993). Sound reflection as an explanation for the content and context of rock art. Rock Art Research, 10(2), 91–101.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lindsey Büster
    • 1
    Email author
  • Eugène Warmenbol
    • 2
  • Dimitrij Mlekuž
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.School of History, Classics and ArchaeologyUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
  2. 2.Centre de Recherches en Archéologie et Patrimoine, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB)BruxellesBelgium
  3. 3.Department of ArchaeologyFaculty of Arts, University of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia
  4. 4.Centre for Preventive Archaeology, Institute for the Protection of Cultural Heritage of SloveniaLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations