Advertisement

Obstetric Critical Care

  • Jean-Ju Sheen
  • Colleen A. Lee
  • Dena Goffman
Chapter
Part of the Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation book series (CHS)

Abstract

Despite advances in healthcare, maternal morbidity and mortality rates have been rising over the last three decades. Potential contributors to this alarming trend include advances in assisted reproductive technologies allowing women to conceive at older ages than previously possible, an increasing number of pregnancies affected by chronic diseases, a rising cesarean delivery rate resulting in complications such as abnormal placentation, and medical advances allowing women with complex illnesses to conceive. Expert consensus has endorsed simulation over traditional teaching methods for improving learner skill and patient outcomes, particularly in a setting of rarely encountered illnesses and increasingly complex patients. Maternal cardiac arrest simulations are one of the more extensively studied obstetrical critical care scenarios, and participation has been associated with improved learner performance. With such promising data in the setting of growing numbers of obstetrical simulation programs, a logical next step is the incorporation of obstetric critical care scenarios into simulation curricula. This chapter will discuss the use of simulation for teaching critical care obstetrics.

Keywords

Critical care Obstetrics Simulation Training Maternal-fetal medicine 

References

  1. 1.
    Main EK, Menard MK. Maternal mortality: time for national action. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(4):735–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Healthier mothers and babies. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1999;48:849–58.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Callaghan WM, Mackay AP, Berg CJ. Identification of severe maternal morbidity during delivery hospitalizations, United States 2001–2003. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(133):e1–8.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Danel I, Berg C, Johnson CH, Atrash H. Magnitude of maternal morbidity during labor and delivery: United States 1993–1997. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:631–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D’Alton ME, Bonanno CA, Berkowitz RL, et al. Putting the “M” back in maternal-fetal medicine. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(6):442–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berg CJ, Mackay AP, Qin C, Callaghan WM. Overview of maternal morbidity during hospitalization for labor and delivery in the United States: 1993–1997 and 2001–2005. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113:1075–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Solheim KM, Esakoff TF, Little SE, et al. The effect of cesarean delivery rates on the future incidence of placenta prevue, placenta accreta, and maternal mortality. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24:1341–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Blanchette H. The rising cesarean delivery rate in America: what are the consequences? Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:687–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). Neonatal resuscitation program. http://www2.aap.org/nrp/7thedinfo.html. Accessed 24 Feb 2017.
  10. 10.
    American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA). Maintenance of certification. http://www.asahq.org/education/moca. Accessed 24 Feb 2017.
  11. 11.
    Bracksick SA, Kashani K, Hocker S. Neurology education for critical care fellows using high-fidelity simulation. Neurocrit Care. 2017;26:96–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Draycott TJ, Crofts JF, Ash JP, Wilson LV, Yard E, Sibanda T, Whitelaw A. Improving neonatal outcome through practical shoulder dystocia training. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(1):14–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Crofts JF, et al. Prevention of brachial plexus injury—12 years of shoulder dystocia training: an interrupted time-series study. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;123(1):111–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Inglis SR, et al. Effects of shoulder dystocia training on the incidence of brachial plexus injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(4):322–e1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Siassakos D, et al. Retrospective cohort study of diagnosis-delivery interval with umbilical cord prolapse: the effect of team training. BJOG. 2009;116(8):1089–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pollock W, Rose L, Dennis CL. Pregnant and postpartum admissions to the intensive care unit: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36:1465–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bajwa SK, Bajwa SJ, Kaur J, Singh K, Kaur J. Is intensive care the only answer for high risk pregnancies in developing nations? J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2010;3:331–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bajwa SJ, Kaur J. Critical care challenges in obstetrics: an acute need for dedicated and coordinated teamwork. Anesth Essays Res. 2014;8(3):267–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kinsella SM, Winton AL, Mushambi MC, et al. Failed tracheal intubation during obstetric general anaesthesia: a literature review. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2015;24:356–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Toda J, Toda AA, Arakawa J. Learning curve for paramedic endotracheal intubation and complications. Int J Emerg Med. 2013;6:38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Je S, Cho Y, Choi HJ, et al. An application of the learning curve-cumulative summation test to evaluate training for endotracheal intubation in emergency medicine. Emerg Med J. 2013;emermed-2013-202470.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Winter J. Hospital episode statistics analysis, health and social care information centre. NHS Maternity Statistics-England, 2012–3.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brunette V, Thibodeau-Jarry N. Simulation as a tool to ensure competency and quality of care in the cardiac critical care unit. Can J Cardiol. 2017;33:119–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mundell WC, Kennedy CC, Szostek JH, Cook DA. Simulation technology for resuscitation training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2013;84:1174–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Department of Health, Welsh Office, Scottish Office Department of Health, Department of Health and Social Services, Northern Ireland. Why mothers die: report on confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom 2000–2002. London: The Stationery Office; 2004.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dijkman A, Huisman CM, Smit M, et al. Cardiac arrest in pregnancy: increasing use of perimortem cesarean section due to emergency skills training? BJOG. 2010;117:282–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jeejeebhoy FM, Zelop CM, Lipman S, et al. AHA scientific statement: cardiac arrest in pregnancy, a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;132:1747–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fisher N, Eisen LA, Bayya JV, et al. Improved performance of maternal-fetal medicine staff after maternal cardiac arrest simulation-based training. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205:239.e1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Adams J, Cepeda Brito JR, Baker L, et al. Management of maternal cardiac arrest in the third trimester of pregnancy: a simulation-based pilot study. Crit Care Res Pract. 2016;2016:5283765.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyNew York Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical CenterNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Quality and Patient SafetyNew York Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical CenterNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyColumbia University Irving Medical CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations