Advertisement

The History of Simulation in Obstetrics and Gynecology

  • David MarzanoEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation book series (CHS)

Abstract

Simulation has become a part of modern day training in the field of obstetrics and gynecology. Medical and nursing schools utilize simulation in many forms including teaching anatomy, development of clinical and communication skills, practice and repetition of those skills, and evaluation for competency. Residency training utilizes simulation to further instruct the development of technical skills, communication skills, and team training. Finally, practicing providers in the field utilize simulation for maintaining skills, learning new techniques, and continual development of team training. While the use of simulation training evokes images of complex high-fidelity models and virtual reality (VR) trainers, the history of simulation dates back many centuries (Owen H, Simul Healthc 7(2):102–116, 2012) and has been a tool used in medical education for much longer than the past 40 years. This chapter will review the history of simulation in obstetrics and gynecology, including the evolution of simulators, importance to medical education, and potential use for future applications.

Keywords

Simulation Obstetrics Gynecology Medical education 

References

  1. 1.
    Lopreiato JO (Ed.), Downing D, Gammon W, Lioce L, Sittner B, Slot V, Spain AE (Associate Eds.), the Terminology & Concepts Working Group. Healthcare simulation dictionary; 2016. Retrieved from http://www.ssih.org/dictionary.
  2. 2.
    Badash I, Burtt K, Solorzano CA, Cary JN. Innovations in surgery simulation: a review of past, current and future techniques. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4(23):453.  https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2016.12.24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Elizondo-Omaña RE, Guzmán-López S, De Los Angeles García-Rodríguez M. Dissection as a teaching tool: past, present, and future. Anat Rec. 2005;285B:11–5.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.b.20070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Owen H. Early use of simulation in healthcare. Simul Healthc. 2012;7(2):102–16.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e3182415a91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cooper JB, Taqueti VR. A brief history of the development of mannequin simulators for clinical education and training. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(Suppl 1):i11–8.  https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2004.009886.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Drife J. The start of life: a history of obstetrics. Postgrad Med J. 2002;78:311–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Acton R. The evolving role of simulation in teaching in undergraduate medical education. In: Brown KM, Paige JT, editors. Simulation in surgical training and Practice. Phildeplhia: Elsevier; 2015. p. 740–1.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Haines CM. International women in science: a biographical dictionary to 1950. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLO, Inc; 2001. p. 32.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clark V, Van de Velde M, Fernando R. Oxford textbook of obstetric anaesthesia. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016. p. 853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Owen H, Pelosi M. A historical examination of the Budin-Pinard Phantom: what can contemporary obstetrics education learn from simulators of the past? Acad Med. 2013;88(5):652–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Association of American Medical Colleges [Interent] AAMC History. Available at: https://www.aamc.org/about/history/. Last accessed Feb 2017.
  12. 12.
    Flexner A. Medical education in the United States and Canada: a report to the Carnegie Foundation for the advancement of teaching. New York; 1910:117. [Internet] Available from: http://archive.carnegiefoundation.org/pdfs/elibrary/Carnegie_Flexner_Report.pdf. Last accessed Feb 2017.
  13. 13.
    Gordon MS, Ewy GA, DeLeon AC Jr, Waugh RA, Felner JM, Forker AD, et al. “Harvey,” the cardiology patient simulator: pilot studies on teaching effectiveness. Am J Cariol. 1980;45(4):791–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Helmreich RL. Managing human error in aviation. Sci Am. 1997;276(5):52–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Committee on Quality of health Care in America; Institute of Medicine. In: Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, editors. To Err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lawrence HC III, Copel JA, O’Keeffe DF, Bradford WC, Scarrow PK, Kennedy HP, et al. Quality patient care in labor and delivery: a call to action. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(3):147–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.07.018.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chapter 4. Medical team training: medical teamwork and patient safety: the evidence-based relation. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville; 2005. Available from: http://archive.ahrq.gov/research/findings/final-reports/medteam/chapter4.html. Last accessed Feb 2017.
  18. 18.
    Saraf S, Parihar R. Sushruta: the first plastic surgeon in 600 BC. Int J Plast Surg. 2006;4(2):1–7.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cumston CG, editor. 7th Suprapubic operation for stone with immediate closure of wound. Transactions of the American Urological Association. Brookline: Riverdale Press; 1909. p. 98.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Spner SJ, Warnock GL. A brief history of endocopy, laparoscoy, and laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1997;7(6):369–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moll FH, Marx FJ. A pioneer in laparoscopy and pelviscopy: Kurt Semm (1927–2003). J Endurology. 2005;19(3):269–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lau WY, Leow CK, Li AKC. History of endoscopic and laparoscopic surgery. World J Surg. 1997;21(4):444–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Advincula AP, Wang K. Evolving role and current state of robotics in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009;16(3):291–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Badash I, Burtt K, Solorzano CA, Carey JN. Innovations in surgery simulation: a review of past, current and future techniques. Am Transl Med. 2016;4(23):453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shore EM, Lefebvre GG, Grantcharov TP. Gynecology resident laparoscopy training: present and future. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(3):298–301, 298.e1.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.039. Epub 2014 Jul 25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Buyske J. The role of simulation in certification. Surg Clin North Am. 2010;90(3):619–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2010.02.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nitschmann C, Bartz D, Johnson NR. Gynecologic simulation training increases medical student confidence and interest in women’s health. Teach Learn Med. 2014;26(2):160–3.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2014.883984.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rosen KR. The history of medical simulation. J Crit Care. 2008;23(2):157–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.12.004. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18538206.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gaba DM. The future’s here. We are it. Simul Healthc. 2006;1:1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    American Congress of Obstetrics and Gynecology [Internet] working group goals and objectives. Available from: http://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/ACOG-Departments/Simulations-Consortium/Consortium-Goals-and-Objectives. Last accessed Feb 2017.
  31. 31.
    American Board of Medical Specialties [Internet] Standards for the ABMS program for maintenance of certification (MOC). January 15, 2014. Available from: www.abms.org/media/1109/standards-for-the-abms-program-for-moc-final.pdf. Last accessed Feb 2017.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations