Advertisement

Lessons from the Peruvian Highlands: Ways Forward and Wider Implications

  • Timothy James Bowyer
Chapter

Abstract

The purpose of this final chapter is to draw attention to some of the issues raised by this study and to identify ways in which things can be taken forward both with respect to rural Andean communities and in the application of findings to other situations and studies). In (1), human and social suffering is considered from three distinct perspectives: (a) the government (b) the powerless and (c) the effects of suffering and reparation and how they are understood. To counter the objectification of human and social suffering and promote greater analytical precision (2) looks at the need for new methodological concepts based around empathy and participation. In (3), the conclusions of the findings from this study are identified and briefly discussed and some of their wider implications cautiously explored.

Keywords

government powerlessness suffering reparation empathy participation subjectivity objectivity reparation responsibility continuity context individuality coping post-traumatic growth 

References

  1. Agamben, G. (1999). Remnants of Auschwitz: The witness and the archive. Brooklyn: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  2. Amery, J. (1980). At the Mind’s limits. Contemplations by a survivor on Auschwitz and its realities. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Antonovsky, A. (1990). Pathways leading to successful coping and health. In M. Rosenbaum (Ed.), Learned resourcefulness: On coping skills, self control, and adaptive behaviour. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Brudholm, T. (2008). Resentment’s virtue: Jean Amery and the refusal to forgive. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bugental, D. B. (2010). Paradoxical power manifestations: Power assertion by the subjectively powerless. In A. Guinote & T. Vescio (Eds.), The social psychology of power. New York: The Guilford Press 209ff.Google Scholar
  6. Cederblad, M., Dahlen, L., Hagnell, O., & Hansson, K. (1995). Intelligence and temperament as protective factors for mental health. A cross-sectional and prospective epidemiological study. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 245(1), 11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chouliaraki, L. (2017). Suffering and the ethics of solidarity. In R. E. Anderson (Ed.), Alleviating world suffering (pp. 49–61). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Compas, B. E., Banes, G. A., Malcarne, V., & Worsham, N. (1991). Perceived control and coping with stress: A developmental perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 47, 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dussaillant, F., & Gonzalez, P. A. (2015). Lifetime suffering and capabilities in Chile. In R. E. Anderson (Ed.), World suffering & the quality of life (pp. 233–251). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1984). Stress appraisal and coping. New York: Springer Pub. Company.Google Scholar
  11. Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Dunkel-Schetter, C., DeLongis, A., & Gruen, R. J. (1986, May). Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(5), 992–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Folkman, S., Chesney, M., McKusick, L., Ironson, G., Johnson, D., & Coates, T. (1991). Translating coping theory into an intervention. In J. Eckenrode (Ed.), The social context of coping (pp. 239–260). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fontaine, K. R., Manstead, A. S. R., & Wagner, H. (1993, October). Optimism, perceived control over stress, and coping. European Journal of Personality, 7(4), 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guinote, A., & Vescio, T. K. (2010). The social psychology of power. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  15. Harvey, D. C. (2015). The cultural geography of community suffering. In R. E. Anderson (Ed.), World suffering & the quality of life (pp. 269–281). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harvey, J. H., & Weary, G. (1981). Perspectives on attributional processes. Dubuque: Wm C Brown.Google Scholar
  17. Hassett, J., & Lacey, H. (1991). Towards a society that serves its people: The intellectual contribution of El Salvador’s Murdered Jesuits. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Jaspers, K. (1947). The question of german guilt. New York: Fordham University Press; 2nd Rev edn (31 October 2000).Google Scholar
  19. Kleinman, A., & Kleinman, J. (1997a). The appeal of experience; The dismay of images: Cultural appropriations of suffering in our times. In A. Kleinman, V. Das, & M. Lock (Eds.), Social suffering. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kleinman, A., & Kleinman, J. (1997b). Cultural appropriations of suffering in our times. In A. Kleinman, V. Das, & M. Lock (Eds.), Social suffering. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kleinman, A., Das, V., & Lock, M. (1997a). Introduction. In A. Kleinman, V. DAS, & M. Lock (Eds.), Social suffering. London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kleinman, A., Das, V., & Lock, M. (1997b). Social Suffering. London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  23. Laplante, L. J. (2007). On the indivisibility of rights: Truth commissions, reparations, and the right to development. Yale Human Rights and Development Journal, 10(1), Article 4.Google Scholar
  24. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. American Psychologist, 46(8), 819–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Why we should think of stress as a subset of emotion. In L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz (Eds.), Handbook of Stress: Theoretical and Clinical Aspects (pp. 21–39). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  26. Lazarus, R. S. (2000). Toward better research on stress and coping. American Psychologist, 55(6), 663–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1986). Estres y procesos cognitivos. Barcelona: Martinez-Roca S.A.Google Scholar
  28. Logstrup, K. (2002). After the ethical demand (S. Dew, &Van Kooten Niekerk, Trans.). Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Maier, S. F., & Watkins, L. R. (1998). Cytokines for psychologists: Implications of bidirectional immune-to-brain communication for understanding behaviour, mood, and cognition. Psychological Review, 105, 83–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Martin-Baro, I. (1989, Spring). Political violence and war as causes of psychosocial trauma in El Salvador. International Journal of Mental Health, Mental Health Aspects of Political Repression and Violence (II), 18(1), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Martin-Baro, I. (1994a). War and the psychosocial trauma of salvadoran children. In Writings for a Liberation Psychology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Martin-Baro, I. (1994b). The Lazy Latino: The ideological nature of Latin American Fatalism. In Writings for a liberation psychology. New York: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Martin-Baro, I. (1994c). Towards a Liberation Psychology. In Writings for a liberation psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Martin-Baro, I. (1994d). Writings for a Liberation Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. McCann, I. L., & Pearlman, L. A. (1990). Vicarious traumatization: A framework for the psychological effects of working with victims. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 3(1), 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Metz, J. B. (1980). Faith in history and society: Toward a fundamental practical theology. New York: Seabury.Google Scholar
  37. Mills, C., & Zavaleta, D. (2015). Shame, humiliation and social isolation. In R. E. Anderson (Ed.), World suffering & the quality of life (pp. 251–269). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  38. Pearlman, L. A., & Saakvitne, K. W. (1995). Trauma and the therapist: Counter-transference and vicarious traumatization in psychotherapy with incest survivors. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  39. Russell, A. M., & Fiske, S. T. (2010). Power and social perception. In A. Guinote & T. Vescio (Eds.), The social psychology of power. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  40. Saakvitne, K. W., Gamble, S., Pearlman, L., & Lev, B. (2000). Risking connection: A training curriculum for working with survivors of childhood abuse. Lutherville: Sidran Press.Google Scholar
  41. Sandin, I. (1995). Values in nurse education – A historical review. Nordic Journal of Nordic Research, 15(1).Google Scholar
  42. Scarry, E. (1985). The body in pain: The making and unmaking of the world. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Schuster, E., & Boschert-Kimmig, R. (1999). Hope against hope: Johann Baptist Metz and Elie Wiesel Speak out on the Holocaust (p. 90). New York: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
  44. Staub, E. (1989). The roots of evil. The origins of genocide and other group violence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Staub, E. (2003). The psychology of good and evil: Why children, adults, and groups help and harm others. Cambridge: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
  46. Thoits, P. (1995). Stress coping and social support process: Where are we, what next? Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 53(Extra Issue), 53–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Watkins, M., & Shulman, H. (2008). Toward psychologies of liberation. New York/London: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timothy James Bowyer
    • 1
  1. 1.SwanseaUK

Personalised recommendations