Advertisement

Vlogging the Hijab: Subjectivity, Affect and Materiality

  • Shazlin Rahman
Chapter

Abstract

Shazlin Rahman’s piece on three young female hijabi vloggers begins with the premise that hijabi is a social practice. The vloggers each had different approaches to hijabi, and were diverse in their articulations of being a Muslim woman. Rahman reflects upon her own early hopes that the hijabi vlogs would offer digital platforms for women’s self expression and as sites free from more oppressive narratives on Muslim women in mainstream media narratives. While the opportunity to vlog has given these young women opportunities to challenge common misconceptions about themselves, in the end, Rahman ultimately expresses her disappointment how the hijabi vloggers are circumscribed by the impulses and logics of consumer culture.

References

  1. Abu-Lughod, Leila. 2002. Do Muslim women really need saving? Anthropological reflections on cultural relativism and its others. American Anthropologist 104 (3): 783–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bullock, Kathy, and Gul Joya Jafri. 2000. Media (mis)representations: Muslim women in the Canadian nation. Canadian Women Studies 20 (2): 35–40.Google Scholar
  3. Byng, Michelle. 2010. Symbolically Muslim: Media, hijab, and the West. Critical Sociology 36 (1): 109–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Christiansen, Connie Carøe. 2011. Contesting visibilities: Sartorial strategies among Muslim women in Danish media. Journal of Intercultural Studies 32 (4): 335–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de Lauretis, Theresa. 1987. Technologies of gender: Essays on theory, film, and fiction. Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  6. El-Nawawy, Mohammad, and Sahar Khamis. 2012. Divergent identities in the virtual Islamic public sphere: A case study of the English discussion forum ‘Islamonline’. Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research 5 (1): 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Freedman, Jane. 2007. Women, Islam and rights in Europe: Beyond a universalist/culturalist dichotomy. Review of International Studies 33 (1): 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Husain, Meher I., Waquas Waheed, and Nusrat Husan. 2006. Self-harm in British South Asian women: Psychosocial correlates and strategies for prevention. Annals of General Psychiatry 5 (7): 1–7.Google Scholar
  9. Lewis, Reina. 2010. Marketing Muslim lifestyle: A new media genre. Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies 6 (3): 58–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. McChesney, Robert W. 2013. Digital disconnect: How capitalism is turning the internet against democracy. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ringrose, Jessica. 2008. ‘Every time she bends over she pulls up her thong’: Teen girls negotiating discourses of competitive. Heterosexualized Aggression. Girlhood Studies 1 (1): 33–59.Google Scholar
  12. Saunders, Doug. 2012. The myth of the Muslim tide: Do immigrants threaten the West? Toronto: Knopff Canada.Google Scholar
  13. Yaqin, Amina. 2015. Islamic Barbie: The politics of gender and performativity. Fashion Theory 11 (2–3): 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Zine, Jasmine. 2008. Honour and identity: An ethnographic account of Muslim girls in a Canadian Islamic school. Topia 9: 35–61.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shazlin Rahman
    • 1
  1. 1.Communications and Engagement ProfessionalTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations