Green for Whom? Exploring Ecotourism as a Climate-Adaptation Strategy in Trang An, Vietnam

  • Thao Hoang
  • Gwenn PulliatEmail author
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)


This chapter adopts a contextual vulnerability approach to examine the urbanizing Truong Yen commune in Trang An scenic landscape complex, a natural and cultural UNESCO World Heritage site in the Red River Delta of Vietnam. Trang An exemplifies the rise of ecotourism in Vietnam as a solution to the country’s need for both economic growth and environmental protection, while responding to climate change adaptation and mitigation challenges. Located in an area undergoing peri-urbanization, Trang An contributes to the fostering of a ‘greener’ urban development pattern while providing local communities with less climate-sensitive livelihoods. However, new vulnerabilities emerge from this transition as a result of redefined power relations and differential access to resources. Our critical approach provides a more nuanced picture of a project that is often represented as a success story. While pitfalls are inevitable in such a transformational project, the lived experience of local residents reveals the complex, elusive, and inefficient governance between the various stakeholders on the management level and begs troubling questions about environmental and social justice.


Ecotourism Environmental protection Green development Vulnerability Environmental justice Vietnam 


  1. Adams M (2018) Greening urban growth: the role of urban and peri-urban forestry. SciTech Eur (blog). 12 Feb 2018.
  2. Ahmad O (2016) Climate resilience in peri-urban areas. India Clim Dialogue (blog). 7 Sept 2016.
  3. Bao M (2010) Ngập úng nghiêm trọng tại Ninh Bình [Severe floods in Ninh Binh]., 28 Aug 2010.
  4. Brooks N, Anderson S, Ayers J, Burton I, Tellam I (2011) Tracking adaptation and measuring development. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED)Google Scholar
  5. Do T (2016) Sớm Đẩy Nhanh Tiến Độ Thực Hiện Dự Án Sông Sào Khê - Ninh Bình [Accelerate implementation of Sao Khe River - Ninh Binh Project]. Nhan Dan, 19 July 2016.
  6. Duc M (2012) Ninh Binh says no to industrial projects in tourism zone—News from the Saigon Times. Saigon Times, 20 Nov 2012.
  7. Fairhead J, Leach M, Scoones I (2012) Green grabbing: a new appropriation of nature? J Peasant Stud 39(2):237–261. Scholar
  8. Fennell DA (2014) Ecotourism. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Hansen K (2013) Land law, land rights, and land reform in Vietnam: a deeper look into ‘land grabbing’ for public and private development. Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection, Oct.
  10. Heynen N, Robbins P (2005) The neoliberalization of nature: governance, privatization, enclosure and valuation. Capital Nat Soc 16(1):5–8. Scholar
  11. Higham J, Lück M (2002) Urban ecotourism: a contradiction in terms? J Ecotour 1(1):36–51. Scholar
  12. Hoai A (2016) Work starts on Nui Coc Lake tourism site. Vietnam Economic Times, 19 Feb 2016.
  13. Hoang T (2009) Implementation of dredging, embankment and landscape conversation Sao Khe River project. Baoninhbinh.Org.Vn. 3 Aug 2009.
  14. Holmes G (2014) What is a land grab? Exploring green grabs, conservation, and private protected areas in southern Chile. J Peasant Stud 41(4):547–567. Scholar
  15. Honey M (2008) Ecotourism and sustainable development. Who owns paradise? 2nd edn. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  16. Kabisch N, Frantzeskaki N, Pauleit S, Naumann S, Davis M, Artmann M, Haase D et al (2016) Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and opportunities for action. Ecol Soc 21(2):39.
  17. Kiss A (2004) Is community-based ecotourism a good use of biodiversity conservation funds? Trends Ecol Evol 19(5):232–237. Scholar
  18. Koens JF, Dieperink C, Miranda M (2009) Ecotourism as a development strategy: experiences from Costa Rica. Environ Dev Sustain 11(6):1225. Scholar
  19. Komaladara AASP, Budiasa IW, Ambarawati IGAA (2015) Rice production vulnerability to climate change in Indonesia: an overview on community-based adaptation. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts 51 (December).
  20. Leaf M (2011) Periurban Asia: a commentary on ‘becoming urban’. Pac Aff 84(3):525–534. Scholar
  21. Liverman D (2004) Who governs, at what scale and at what price? Geography, environmental governance, and the commodification of nature.
  22. Ly TP, Bauer T (2014) Ecotourism in mainland Southeast Asia: theory and practice. Tourism Leisure Glob Change 1:CUHK 61–80.
  23. Matthews RB, Kropff MJ, Horie T, Bachelet D (1997) Simulating the impact of climate change on rice production in asia and evaluating options for adaptation. Agric Syst 54(3):399–425. Scholar
  24. McLaughlin P, Dietz T (2008) Structure, agency and environment: toward an integrated perspective on vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 18(1):99–111. Scholar
  25. McNall SG, Dang LQ, Sobieszczyk T (2016) Ecotourism in Costa Rica and Vietnam: is it sustainable? Sustain: J Rec 9(3): 144–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mitchell G, Norman P, Mullin K (2015) Who benefits from environmental policy? An environmental justice analysis of air quality change in Britain, 2001–2011. Environ Res Lett 10(10):105009. Scholar
  27. Mottet É, Roche Y (2009) L’urbanisation de la ville de Ninh Binh dans le delta du fleuve rouge (Vietnam) : mise en perspective des forces et faiblesses de la gestion du risque d’inondation. VertigO, no. Volume 8 Numéro 3 (January).
  28. Munien S, Nkambule SS, Buthelezi HZ (2016) Conceptualisation and use of green spaces in peri-urban communities: experiences from Inanda, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Afr J Phys Health Educ Recreation Dance (S2):155–167Google Scholar
  29. Neto F (2003) A new approach to sustainable tourism development: moving beyond environmental protection. Nat Resour Forum 27(3):212–222. Scholar
  30. Nguyen VS (2009) Industrialization and urbanization in Vietnam: how appropriation of agricultural land use rights transformed farmers’ livelihoods in a peri-urban Hanoi village. Final Report of an EADN Individual Research Grant Project, EADN Working Paper, no. 38Google Scholar
  31. Nguyen Leroy ML (2015) Les Enjeux de La Nouvelle Réforme Foncière Au Vietnam. Les carnets de l’IRASEC. IRASEC. http://www.file://Users/gwenn/Downloads/Les_enjeux_de_la_nouvelle_ reforme_fonciere_au_Vietnam.pdfGoogle Scholar
  32. Nguyen-Marshall V, Drummond LBW, Bélanger D (eds) (2012) The reinvention of distinction. Modernity and the middle class in urban Vietnam. Springer, Dordrecht. Scholar
  33. Ninh Binh’s Provincial People’s Committee (2015a) Ninh Binh’s climate change action plan (for the Period 2016–2020)Google Scholar
  34. Ninh Binh’s Provincial People’s Committee (2015b) Report on implementation of the requests by the Unesco World Heritage Committee relating to the Trang An landscape complex property, Ninh Binh Province, VietnamGoogle Scholar
  35. O’Brien K, Ericksen S, Nygaard LP, Schjolden A (2007) Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses. Clim Policy 7(1):73–88. Scholar
  36. Ogara OW, Seneiya JO, Ongoro EB (2013) Community based conservation and ecotourism as an environmental management practice for climate change adaptation in Ewaso Nyiro arid land ecosystem, Samburu County Kenya. J Environ Sci Water Resour 2(4):106–111Google Scholar
  37. Ortmann S (2017) Environmental governance in Vietnam: institutional reforms and failures. Springer, ChamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pearsall G (2017) Using eco-toursim to adapt to climate change in the Philippines. Acclimatise – Building Climate Resilience (blog). 2017.
  39. Phuc NQ, van Westen ACM, Zoomers A (2014) Agricultural land for urban development: the process of land conversion in Central Vietnam. Habitat Int 41(January):1–7. Scholar
  40. Place S (1995) Ecotourism for sustainable development: oxymoron or plausible strategy? GeoJournal 35(2):161–173. Scholar
  41. Scheyvens R (1999) Ecotourism and the empowerment of local communities. Tour Manag 20(2):245–249. Scholar
  42. Simpson A, Farrelly N, Holliday I (2017) Routledge handbook of contemporary Myanmar. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  43. Southgate CRJ (2006) Ecotourism in Kenya: the vulnerability of communities. J Ecotour 5(1–2):80–96. Scholar
  44. Stem CJ, Lassoie JP, Lee DR, Deshler DJ (2003) How ‘eco’ is ecotourism? A comparative case study of ecotourism in Costa Rica. J Sustain Tour 11(4):322–347. Scholar
  45. Stone MT, Nyaupane GP (2016) Protected areas, tourism and community livelihoods linkages: a comprehensive analysis approach. J Sustain Tour 24(5):673–693. Scholar
  46. Stronza A, Gordillo J (2008) Community views of ecotourism. Ann Tour Res 35(2):448–468. Scholar
  47. Thai B (2017) Ninh Bình Thiệt Hại Hơn 1.000 Tỷ Đồng Trong Trận Lụt Lịch Sử [Historic floods cost Ninh Binh more than 1000 billion dong]. Dan Tri, 23 Oct 2017.
  48. Tourism Ministers and Heads of Delegation of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (2017) Pakse declaration on ASEAN roadmap for strategic development of ecotourism clusters and tourism corridorsGoogle Scholar
  49. Tran T, Dinh L (2014) Agricultural land policies in Vietnam. FFTC Agriculture Policy Platform, OctoberGoogle Scholar
  50. UNESCO (2003) What is ecotourism? United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  51. Vietnam Communist Party (2006) Transactions of the 10th Party Congress. National Political PublisherGoogle Scholar
  52. Vy P (2016) Gần 60 Ha Lúa ở Ninh Bình Trắng Bông Bất Thường Sau Một Đêm [Nearly 60 hectares of rice in Ninh Binh turned white unsually after one night]. VnExpress, 21 May 2016.
  53. Wall G (1997) FORUM: is ecotourism sustainable? Environ Manage 21(4):483–491. Scholar
  54. Wells M, Swinkels R, Turk C (2005) Regional poverty assessment: Red River delta region. 41575. The World Bank.
  55. World Tourism Organization (n.d.) Trang An ecological tourist site, Viet Nam: a case study of community-based tourism. Accessed 28 Mar 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Teach for VietnamHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
  2. 2.CNRS (French National Center for Scientific Research), UMR Art-Dev, Université Paul ValéryMontpellier Cedex 5France

Personalised recommendations