Advertisement

The Implementation Gap: Environmental Rhetoric Versus Reality in Lao Cai, Vietnam

  • Gwenn PulliatEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)

Abstract

This study draws upon a case study of Lao Cai, a province recognized as one of the most important ecological regions in Vietnam, but also one of the most vulnerable to climate hazards. The province has recently adopted an action plan for climate change adaptation. However, the national authorities intend to promote Lao Cai as a major secondary city on the main route from China to Hanoi. In a context of rapid, strategic, state-driven urban development, I identify three main obstacles to effective implementation of environmental and climate change policies: (1) the pre-eminence of economic growth over any environmental goal, (2) the under-enforcement of existing regulations, and (3) a failure of environmental governance. Environmental risk management is mainly based on the reinforcement of defensive infrastructures (such as the river embankment) and the displacement of exposed people. These actions are likely inefficient in a context of increased major hazards that might put great pressure on displaced residents’ livelihoods. In other words, there is a wide gap between discourse and implementation.

Keywords

Climate change adaptation policies Environmental governance Land use management Urban planning Population displacement Vietnam 

References

  1. Adger WN (1999) Social vulnerability to climate change and extremes in coastalVietnam.World Dev 27(2):249–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00136-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger WN (2001) Scales of governance and environmental justice for adaptation and mitigation of climate change. J Int Dev 13(7):921–931.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amin A, Graham S (1997) The ordinary city. Trans Inst Br Geogr 22(4):411–429.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-2754.1997.00411.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anguelovski I, Carmin J (2011) Something borrowed, everything new: innovation and institutionalization in urban climate governance. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 3(3):169–175.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Asif F, Marschke M, Ngin C (2017) Assessing the potential of a low-carbon future for Cambodia. J Renew Sustain Energy 9(2).  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4978495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berrang-Ford L, Ford J D, Paterson J (2011) Are we adapting to climate change? Glob Environ Change 21(1):25–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Birkmann J, Garschagen M, Kraas F, Quang N (2010) Adaptive urban governance: new challenges for the second generation of urban adaptation strategies to climate change. Sustain Sci 5(2):185–206.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-010-0111-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chan HS, Wong K, Cheung KC, Lo JM (1995) The implementation gap in environmental management in China: the case of Guangzhou, Zhengzhou, and Nanjing. Publ Admin Rev 55(4):333–340.  https://doi.org/10.2307/977124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Danielsen F, Burgess ND, Jensen PM, Pirhofer-Walzl K (2010) Environmental monitoring: the scale and speed of implementation varies according to the degree of peoples involvement. J Appl Ecol 47(6):1166–1168.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01874.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Oliveira Puppim JA (2013) Learning how to align climate, environmental and development objectives in cities: lessons from the implementation of climate co-benefits initiatives in Urban Asia. J Clean Prod Spec Vol: Clim Co-benefits Urban Asia 58(Nov):7–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dupuis J, Knoepfel P (2013) The adaptation policy paradox: the implementation deficit of policies framed as climate change adaptation. Ecol Soc 18(4).  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05965-180431
  12. Evers, HD, Korff R (2000) Southeast Asian urbanism: the meaning and power of social space. LIT Verlag MünsterGoogle Scholar
  13. Hansen K (2013) Land law, land rights, and land reform in Vietnam: a deeper look into ‘land grabbing’ for public and private development. Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection, Oct. http://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/1722
  14. Hunt A, Watkiss P (2011) Climate change impacts and adaptation in cities: a review of the literature. Clim Change 104(1):13–49.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9975-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hutt D (2017) Will the environment be the Vietnam government’s downfall? The Diplomat, Mar 22. https://thediplomat.com/2017/03/will-the-environment-be-the-vietnam-governments-downfall/
  16. ICLEI (2017) Resilient cities report 2017: tracking local progress on the resilience targets of SDG 11. https://resilientcities2018.iclei.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/RC2017_Report_Online_26102017_Final-compressed.pdf
  17. Jones GW, Fraser SE (1982) Population resettlement policies in Vietnam. In: Jones GW, Richter HV (eds) Population resettlement programs in Southeast Asia. Development Studies Centre Monograph. Development Studies Centre, Australian National University, pp 113–133. https://www.popline.org/node/422448
  18. Kerkvliet BJT (2003) Authorities and the people: an analysis of state-society relations in Vietnam. In: Van Luong H (ed) Postwar Vietnam: dynamics of a transforming society. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies/Rowman & Littlefield publishers, Singapore, p 27Google Scholar
  19. Labbé D (2016) Critical reflections on land appropriation and alternative urbanization trajectories in periurban Vietnam. Cities 53(April):150–155.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.11.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Labbé D, Musil C (2014) Periurban land redevelopment in Vietnam under market socialism. Urban Stud 51(6):1146–1161.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013495574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lao Cai core working group of M-BRACE project (2014) Climate action plan for Lao Cai City responding to climate change from 2014–2020 and visioning to 2030. Institute for Social and Environmental Transition-InternationalGoogle Scholar
  22. Leaf M (2011) Periurban Asia: a commentary on ‘becoming urban’. Pac Aff 84(3):525–534.  https://doi.org/10.5509/2011843525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lo, CWH, Leung SW (2000) Environmental agency and public opinion in Guangzhou: the limits of a popular approach to environmental governance. China Q 163 (Sept):677–704.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741000014612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mitchell C, Laycock K (2017) Planning for adaptation to climate change: exploring the climate science-to-practice disconnect. Climate and Development, Dec, 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2017.1411243
  25. Mol APJ (2009) Environmental governance through information: China and Vietnam. Singap J Trop Geogr 30(1):114–129.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9493.2008.00358.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moser S (2010) Putrajaya: Malaysia’s new federal administrative capital. Cities 27(4):285–297.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2009.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nguyen-Marshall V, Drummond LBW, Bélanger D (eds) (2012) The reinvention of distinction. Modernity and the middle class in urban Vietnam. Springer, Dordrecht.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2306-1Google Scholar
  28. Nhan D (2017) Tropical low depression brings heavy rain, flooding to northern and central regions. Nhan Dan Online, Oct 10. http://en.nhandan.com.vn/society/item/5559802-tropical-low-depression-brings-heavy-rain-flooding-to-northern-and-central-regions.html
  29. Ortmann, S (2017) Environmental governance in Vietnam: institutional reforms and failures. Springer, ChamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Phuc NQ, van Westen ACM, Zoomers A (2014) Agricultural land for urban development: the process of land conversion in Central Vietnam. Habitat Int 41(January):1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.06.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rimmer PJ, Dick HW (2009) The city in Southeast Asia: patterns. NUS Press, Processes and PolicyGoogle Scholar
  32. Roberts B, Hohmann R (2014) The systems of secondary cities—the neglected drivers of urbanising economies. CIVIS Series. Cities Alliance. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/400881468181444474/pdf/898610BRI0CIVI00Box385295B00PUBLIC0.pdf
  33. Robinson, J (2006) Ordinary cities: between modernity and development. Psychology PressGoogle Scholar
  34. Roche Y, De Koninck R (2002) Les enjeux de la déforestation au Vietnam. VertigO - la revue électronique en sciences de l’environnement, no. vol 3 Numéro 1 (Apr).  https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.4113
  35. Ryan D (2015) From commitment to action: a literature review on climate policy implementation at city level. Clim Change 131(4):519–529.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1402-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Saavedra C, Budd WW (2009) Climate change and environmental planning: working to build community resilience and adaptive capacity in Washington State, USA. Habitat Int. Climate Change Human Settl 33(3):246–252.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.10.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schneider A, Mertes CM (2014) Expansion and growth in Chinese cities, 1978–2010. Environ Res Lett 9(2):024008.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/2/024008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thayer CA (2009) Vietnam and the challenge of political civil society. Contemp Southeast Asia: J Int Strategic Aff 31(1):1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tong Y (2007) Bureaucracy meets the environment: elite perceptions in six Chinese cities. China Q 189(March):100–121.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741006000828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Trincsi K, Pham TTH, Turner S (2014) Mapping mountain diversity: ethnic minorities and land use land cover change in Vietnam’s borderlands. Land Use Policy 41(Supplement C):484–497.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Turner S (2012a) Making a living the hmong way: an actor-oriented livelihoods approach to everyday politics and resistance in upland Vietnam. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 102(2):403–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Turner S (2012b) ‘Forever Hmong’: ethnic minority livelihoods and Agrarian transition in upland Northern Vietnam. Prof Geogr 64(4):540–553.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2011.611438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Urwin K, Jordan A (2008) Does public policy support or undermine climate change adaptation? exploring policy interplay across different scales of governance. Glob Environ Change 18(1):180–191.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.08.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Viet Nam News (2016) 10 People swept away in Lào Cai flood. Viet Nam News, May 8, 2016. http://vietnamnews.vn/society/300716/10-people-swept-away-in-lao-cai-flood.html
  45. Viet Nam News (2017a) Heavy rains wreak Havoc in Lào Cai. Viet Nam News, Sept 28. http://vietnamnews.vn/society/394625/heavy-rains-wreak-havoc-in-lao-cai.html#Dy6tMXwgsIwE19Q2.97
  46. Viet Nam News (2017b) 2017 Plagued by Devestating Natural Disasters. Vietnamnews.Vn, Dec 30. http://vietnamnews.vn/society/420360/2017-plagued-by-devestating-natural-disasters.html
  47. Womack B (2006) China and Vietnam: the politics of asymmetry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Wong J, Chan S (2003) China-Asean free trade agreement: shaping future economic relations. Asian Surv 43(3):507–526.  https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2003.43.3.507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yusuf AA, Francisco H (2009) Climate change vulnerability mapping for Southeast Asia. https://idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org/handle/10625/46380

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CNRS (French National Center for Scientific Research), UMR Art-Dev, Université Paul ValéryMontpellier Cedex 5France
  2. 2.Urban Climate Resilience in Southeast Asia Partnership, Munk School of Global AffairsAsian Institute, University of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations