Advertisement

Innovations in Co-Created Smart City Services

  • Krassimira PaskalevaEmail author
  • Ian Cooper
Chapter
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 35)

Abstract

This study is focused on co-creation of public services in the smart city from an open innovation management perspective. Drawing on both literature and empirical data from four smart city projects in Europe, it discusses the context of collaborative service creation (cocreation) requiring public service providers to engage with the citizens in the whole life cycle of service delivery (co-production). An integrated conceptual approach to co-production is adopted in order to understand how public service providers and users can co-create both individual and public value through their interaction in co-producing the services people appreciate and need, to impact on citizen and communal welfare. In particular, the sets of skills necessary for co-producing smart city services effectively are identified, allowing public service providers to gather the necessary user insight and their operational processes and to identify appropriate management approaches for delivering effective high quality urban services. Research is based on experience gained from SmartiP, a European multidisciplinary project focused on the co-production of citizens-centered internet-enabled services in the public sector. The use made by public service managers of a bespoke Self-Assessment Toolkit is analysed to identify what they prioritised when reporting their experiences of co-production. The results suggest that service managers need not only the capacity and skills for managing co-creation activities but for employing a governance structure that encourages collaboration between the multiplicities of stakeholders involved in the smart city open innovation eco-system. The findings can be used by both scholars and city administrations and public servants concerned with smart city services to drive co-creation activities and to redefine relevant operating processes to ensure sustainable value co-creation.

Keywords

Smart city Public service co-production Value co-creation Open innovation Management skills 

References

  1. Adams, R., Bessant, J., & Phelps, R. (2006). Innovation management measurement: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(1), 21–47.Google Scholar
  2. Alawadhi, S., Aldama-Nalda, A., Hafedh, C., Ramon Gil-Garcia, J., Leung, S., & Mellouli, S. (2012). Building understanding of Smart City initiatives. In H. J. Scholl, M. Janssen, et al. (Eds.), Electronic government. EGOV 2012 Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 7443). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Alford, J. (2009). Engaging public sector clients: From service-delivery to co-production. Macmillan: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  4. Agarwal, P. K. (2013). 311 services: A real-world perspective. Public Administration Review, 73(5), 702–703.Google Scholar
  5. Arnstein, S. R. (July 1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. JAIP, 35(4), 216–224.Google Scholar
  6. Azman, K. (2011). The problem of “democratic deficit” in the European Union. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(5), 242–250.Google Scholar
  7. Bakıcı, T., Almirall, E., & Wareham, J. (2013). A smart city initiative: The case of Barcelona. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4(2), 135–148.Google Scholar
  8. Bellamy, C. (2000). The politics of public information systems. In G. Garson (Ed.), Handbook of public information systems. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  9. Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., & Ståhlbröst, A. (2009). Living lab: An open and citizen-centric approach for innovation. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 1(4), 356–370.Google Scholar
  10. Bovaird, T., & Downe, J. (2008). Innovation in public engagement and co-production of services. Policy Paper for Department for Communities and Local Government: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271517523_Innovation_In_Public_Engagement_And_Co-Production_Of_Services_Policy_Paper_for_Department_for_Communities_and_Local_Government.Google Scholar
  11. Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, L. (2016). User and community co-production of public services: What does the evidence tell us? International Journal of Public Administration, 39(13), 1006–1019.Google Scholar
  12. Bovaird, T., Van Ryzin, G., Loeffler, E., & Parrado, S. (2015). Activating citizens to participate in collective co-production of public services. Journal of Social Policy, 44, 1): 1–1):23.Google Scholar
  13. Boyle, D., & Harris, M. (2009). The challenge of co-production: How equal partnerships between professionals and the public are crucial to improving public services. London: New Economic Foundation (NEF), The Lab/NESTA.Google Scholar
  14. Brandsen, T., & Honingh, M. (2016). Distinguishing different types of coproduction: A conceptual analysis based on the classical definitions. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 427–435.Google Scholar
  15. Carstensen, H. V., & Bason, C. (2012). Powering collaborative policy innovation: Can innovation labs help? The Innovation Journal, 17(1), 2.Google Scholar
  16. Chathoth, P., Altinay, L., Harrington, R. J., & Chan, E. S. W. (2013). Co-production versus co-creation: A process based continuum in the hotel service context. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 32, 11–20.Google Scholar
  17. Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  18. Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Ramon Gil-Garcia, J., Mellouli, S., Nahon. K., Pardo, T. A., & Scholl, H. J. (2012). Understanding Smart Cities: An Integrative Framework. In: Proceedings 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science. http://www.ctg.albany.edu/publications/journals/hicss_2012_smartcities/hicss_2012_smartcities.pdf
  19. CitizenLab. (2017). What is the difference between citizen engagement and participation? Retrieved from https://www.citizenlab.co/blog/civic-engagement/what-is-the-difference-between-citizen-engagement-and-participation/
  20. de Jong, M., Joss, S., Schraven, D., Zhan, C., & Margot, W. (2015). Sustainable–smart–resilient–low carbon eco–knowledge cities: Making sense of a multitude of concepts promoting sustainable urbanization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 109, 25–38.Google Scholar
  21. Devendra, D. (2010). Measuring e-Governance as an innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 27(1), 41–48.Google Scholar
  22. Doroshenko, M., Miles, I., & Vinogradov, D. (2013). Knowledge intensive business services as generators of innovations. (Higher School of Economics Research Paper No. WP BRP 12/STI/2013). Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2282511
  23. Draetta, L., & Labarthe, F. (2010). The Living Labs at the test of user-centred innovation - Proposal of a methodological framework. Lugano: CE 2010 – Collaborative Environments for Sustainable Innovation, Lugano, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  24. Dunston, R., Lee, A., Boud, D., Brodie, P., & Chiarella, M. (2009). Co-production and health SystemReform – From Re-imagining to Re-making. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 68(1), 39–52.Google Scholar
  25. Durose, C., Mangan, C., Needham, C., & Matthew, J. R. (2013). Transforming local public services through co-production. In AHRC connected communities Programme. http://www.bhamsouthcommunitysafety.co.uk/wpcontent/uploads/2015/03/AHRC-Connected-CommunitiesTransforminlocal-public-services-through-co-production.pdfGoogle Scholar
  26. Edvardsson, B., Tronvoll, B., & Gruber, T. (2011). Expanding understanding of service exchange and value co-creation: A social construction approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(2), 327–339.Google Scholar
  27. Eger, J. M. (2009). Smart growth, smart cities, and the crisis at the pump a worldwide phenomenon. I-WAYS - The Journal of E-Government Policy and Regulation, 32(1), 47–53.Google Scholar
  28. Farr, M. (2013). Citizens and the co-creation of public service innovations. In S. Osborne & L. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of innovation in public services. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  29. Farr, M. (2016). Co-production and value co-creation in outcome-based contracting in public services. Public Management Review, 18(5), 654–672.Google Scholar
  30. Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., & Meijers, E. (2007). Smart cities: Ranking of European medium-sized cities. Centre of Regional Science, Vienna University of Technology. http://www.smartcities.eu/download/smart_cities_final_report.pdf
  31. Gil-Garcia, J. R., Helbig, N., & Ojo, A. (2014). Being smart: Emerging technologies and innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 31(S1), 11–18.Google Scholar
  32. Gil-García, J. R., & Pardo, T. (2005). E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 187–216.Google Scholar
  33. Gil-Garcia, J. R., Pardo, T., & Nam, T. (2016). Smarter as the new urban agenda. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Gottfridsson, P. (2012). Joint service development – The creations of the prerequisite for the service development. Managing Service Quality, 22(1), 21–37.Google Scholar
  35. Gronroos, C. (2011). Value co-creation in service logic: A critical analysis. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 279–301.Google Scholar
  36. Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public service: Past and present. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 17(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
  37. Hollands, R. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? City, 12(3), 303–320.Google Scholar
  38. Huxham, C. (2003). Theorizing collaboration practice. Public Management Review, 5(3), 401–423.Google Scholar
  39. Hwang, M. I., & Thorn, R. G. (1999). The effect of user engagement on system success: A meta-analytical integration of research findings. Information and Management, 35, 229–236.Google Scholar
  40. Johnston, E., & Hansen, D. (2011). Design lessons for smart governance infrastructures. In D. Balutis & T. Buss (Eds.), Transforming American governance 3.0: Rebooting the public square? New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Julian, G. (2013). Social media and citizen engagement. Retrieved from http://www.georgejulian.co.uk/2013/01/22/social-media-and-citizen-engagement/
  42. Juujrvi, S., & Pesso, K. (2013). Actor roles in an urban living lab: What can we learn from Suurpelto Finland? Technology Innovation Management Review, 3, 22–27.Google Scholar
  43. Lee, J., Hancock, M., & Hu, M.-C. (2014). Towards an effective framework for building smart cities: Lessons from Seoul and San Francisco. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 89, 80–99.Google Scholar
  44. Lin, W. T., & Shao, B. B. M. (2000). The relationship between user participation and system success: a simultaneous contingency approach. Information and Management, 37(6), 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(99)00055-5.Google Scholar
  45. Lindgren, I., & Jansson, G. (2013). Electronic services in the public sector: A conceptual framework. Government Information Quarterlay, 30(2), 163–172.Google Scholar
  46. Mauher, M., & Smokvina, V. (2016). Digital to intelligent local government transition framework. MIPRO 2006, 29th International Convention (p. 11).Google Scholar
  47. Meijer, A., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2016). Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392–408.Google Scholar
  48. Mooij, J. (2003). Smart governance? Politics in the policy process in Andhra Pradesh, India (ODI Working Papers 228). Retrieved from http://www.odi.org.uk/resources/download/1793.pdf
  49. Mulder, I., Velthuas, D., & Kriesn, M. (2008). The living labs harmonization cube: Communicating living lab essentials. The Electronic Journal for Virtual Organizations and Networks, 10, 1–14.Google Scholar
  50. Nabatchi, T., Sancino, T., & Sicilia, M. (2016). Varieties of participation in public services: The who, when, and what of coproduction. Public Administration Review, 77(5), 766–776.Google Scholar
  51. Nam, T., & Pardo, T. (2011, September 26–28). Smart city as urban innovation: Focusing on management, policy, and context. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, Tallinn, Estonia (pp 185–194). Retrieved from https://www.ctg.albany.edu/publications/journals/icegov_2011_smartcity/icegov_2011_smartcity.pdf
  52. Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2014). The changing face of a city government: A case of Philly311. Government Information Quarterly, 31, 1–9.Google Scholar
  53. Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2009). Virtual customer environments: Testing a model of voluntary participation in value co-creation activities. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(4), 388–406.Google Scholar
  54. Naphade, M., Banavar, G., Harrison, C., Paraszczak, J., & Morris, R. (2011). Smarter cities and their innovation challenges. Comput. (Long. Beach. Calif), 44(6), 32–39.Google Scholar
  55. Nesti, G. (2017). Living labs: A new tool for co-production? In A. Bisello et al. (Eds.), Smart and sustainable planning for cities and regions (Green energy and technology). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  56. Orr, K., & Bennett, M. (2011). Public administration scholarship and the politics of coproducing academic–practitioner research. Public Administration Review, 72(4), 487–496.Google Scholar
  57. Osborne, S. (2010). The new public governance?: Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Osborne, S., & Brown, L. (2011). Innovation, public policy and public services delivery in the UK: The word that would be king? Public Administration, 89(4), 1335–1350.Google Scholar
  59. Osborne, S., & Brown, L. (2013). Introduction: Innovation in public services. In S. Osborne & L. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of innovation in public services. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  60. Osborne, S., Radnor, Z., & Nasi, G. (2013). A new theory for public service management? Toward a (public) service-dominant approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 135–158.Google Scholar
  61. Osborne, S., Radnor, Z., & Strokosch, K. (2016). Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: A suitable case for treatment? Public Management Review, 18(5), 639–653.Google Scholar
  62. Osborne, S., & Strokosch, K. (2013). It takes two to tango? Understanding the coproduction of public services by integrating the services management and public administration perspectives. British Journal of Management, 24(1), 31–47.Google Scholar
  63. Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Senach, B., & Scapin, D. (2010). Living lab research landscape: From user centred design and user experience towards user cocreation. In First EU Summer School ‘living labs’.Google Scholar
  64. Palmer, H., & Walasek, H. (Eds.). (2016). Co-production in action. Gothenburg: Mistra Urban Futures.Google Scholar
  65. Papastathopoulou, P., & Hultink, E. (2012). New service development: An analysis of 27 years of research. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(5), 705–714.Google Scholar
  66. Paskaleva, K. (2009). Enabling the smart city: The progress of city e-governance in Europe. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 1(4), 405–422.Google Scholar
  67. Paskaleva, K. (2011). The smart city: A nexus for open innovation? Intelligent Buildings International, 3(3), 153–171.Google Scholar
  68. Paskaleva, K., & Cooper, I. (2017). Co-production and governance for smart city services: Learning from practice: Introduction. International Journal of Services, Technology and Management, 23(5/6), 1–12.Google Scholar
  69. Paskaleva, K., & Cooper, I. (2018). Open innovation evaluation for Internet-enabled services in smart cities. Technovation, Online July 28Google Scholar
  70. Paskaleva, K., Cooper, I., & Goncilo, G. (2016). Tools and techniques for co-producing smart city services: Does one size fit all? In M. R. B. Bolívar (Ed.), Smart technologies for smart governments: Transparency, efficiency and organizational issues (Public Administration and Information Technology) (Vol. 24). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  71. Patel, Z. (2015). Co-producing urban services. International Development Planning Review, 37(2), 187–203.Google Scholar
  72. Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2008). Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 83–96.Google Scholar
  73. Perry, B., & Atherton, M. (2017). Beyond critique: The value of co-production in realising just cities? Local Environment, 22(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  74. Pestoff, V., Brandsen, T., & Verscheure, B. (Eds.). (2012). New public governance, co-production and the third sector. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  75. Potts, J. (2009). The innovation deficit in public services: The curious problem of too much efficiency and not enough waste and failure. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 11, 34–43.Google Scholar
  76. Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5–14.Google Scholar
  77. Radnor, Z., Osborne, S. P., Kinder, T., & Mutton, J. (2014). Operationalizing co-production in public services delivery: The contribution of service blueprinting. Public Management Review, 16(3), 402–423.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.848923Google Scholar
  78. Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2014). The co-creation paradigm. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Roser, T., De Fillippi, R., & Samson, A. (2013). Managing your co-creation mix: Co-creation ventures in distinctive contexts. European Business Review, 25(1), 20–41.Google Scholar
  80. Sancino, A. (2016). The meta coproduction of community outcomes: Towards a citizens’ capabilities approach. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(1), 409–424.Google Scholar
  81. Scholl, H. J., Barzilai-Nahon, K., Ahn, J.-H., Popova, O. H., & Re, B. (2009). E-commerce and e-government: How do they compare? What can they learn from each other? Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 1–10). Waikoloa: IEEE.Google Scholar
  82. Spohrer, J., & Maglio, P. (2008). The emergence of service science: Toward systematic service innovations to accelerate co-creation of value. Production and Operations Management, 17(3), 238–246.Google Scholar
  83. Strokosch, K. (2013). Co-production and innovation in public services: Can co-production drive innovation? In S. Osborne & L. Brown (Eds.), Hand-book of innovation in public services. Cheltenham, England: Edgar Elgar.Google Scholar
  84. Svensson, G., & Gronroos, C. (2008). Service logic revisited: Who creates value? And who co-creates? European Business Review, 20(4), 298–314.Google Scholar
  85. Vangen, S., & Huxham, C. (2003). Nurturing collaborative relations: Building trust in inter-organizational collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(1), 5–31.Google Scholar
  86. Vargo, S., & Lusch, R. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  87. Voorberg, V. J., Bekkers, M., & Tummers, L. G. (2014). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333–1357.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, Alliance Manchester Business SchoolUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
  2. 2.Eclipse ResearchCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations