The Dissolution of Trust: Coercion and Chicago’s Integral State

  • Kendall A. Taylor
Part of the New Frontiers in Education, Culture, and Politics book series (NFECP)


This chapter examines the coercive side of hegemony. Drawing on the work of Jonathan Davies, the chapter begins with a discussion of Gramsci’s notion of the integral state to argue that it is a necessary component of hegemony. In the Chicago context, coercion is used to provide cover for the “soft-power” matrix of neoliberal education reform as well as to ensure the containment of those who are antagonistic to these goals. The use of coercion acts to dissolve the trust necessary to maintain a democratic society as some communities (of color) are sacrificed in the name of reform so that other communities can flourish. Despite the use of coercion, however, there remain many spaces in which neoliberal hegemony as it relates to education can be actively and successfully contested.


  1. Anonymous. (2011, September 3). Three CPS schools break from union, OK longer school day. Huffington Post Chicago. Available at
  2. Anonymous. (2011, September 8). Fourth school votes to break from union, approve longer day. Huffington Post. Available at
  3. Anonymous. (2012, January 9). Longer school day begins Monday at select Chicago public schools. Huffington Post. Available at
  4. Anonymous. (2013, May 22). Chicago board of ed votes to shut down 50 schools. CBS News. Available at
  5. Ahmed-Ullan, N. S., Chase, J., & Specter, B. (2013, May 23). CPS approves largest school closure in history. Chicago Tribune. Available at
  6. Allen, D. (2004). Talking to strangers: Anxieties of citizenship since Brown v. Board of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P., & Passerson, J. C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society, and culture (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2002). Cities and the geographies of ‘actually existing neoliberalism’. In N. Brenner & N. Theodore (Eds.), Spaces of neoliberalism: Urban restructuring in North America and Western Europe. (pp. 2–32). Malden, MA.: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, W. (2005). Edgework: Critical essays on knowledge and politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Burchell, G., Gordon, C., & Miller, P. (Eds.). (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Davies, J. S. (2012). Network governance theory: A Gramscian critique. Environment and Planning A, 44, 2687–2704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davies, J. S. (2013). Whatever happened to coercion? A Gramscian critique of Metagovernance theory. Paper presented to the Poltical Studies Association, March 27. Available at
  13. Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Delanty, G. (2007). Citizenship as a learning process: Disciplinary citizenship versus cultural citizenship. Available at
  15. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  16. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: An introduction. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  17. Gill, S. (2003). Power and resistance in the new world order. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Karp, S. (2011, October 27). Charters line up for extended-day cash. In Catalyst Chicago. Available at
  19. Kingdon, J. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). New York: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Klein, N. (2008). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
  21. Lemke, T. (2001). ‘The birth of bio-politics’: Michel Foucault’s lecture at the College de France on neo-liberal governmentality. Economy and Society, 30(4), 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lipman, P. (2013). Economic crisis, accountability, and the state’s coercive assault on public education in the USA. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 557–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lutten, L. (2013, August 13). Just months after closing 50 schools, Chicago issues RFP for more charter schools. WBEZ. Available at
  24. Lutton, L., & Vevea, B. (2012, July 24). Agreement reached on longer Chicago school day. WBEZ. Available at
  25. Means, A. (2011). Aesthetics, affect, and educational politics. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(10), 1088–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Purcell, M. (2003). Citizenship and the right to the global city: Reimagining the capitalist world order. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(3), 564–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Raphael, T. J. (2015, September 11). In Chicago, neighborhood organizers go on hunger strike-to get their school back. WBEZ. Available at
  28. Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Saltman, K. (2007). Capitalizing on disaster: Taking and breaking public schools. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
  30. Schaper, D. (2012, April, 23). Chicago wants longer school day; foes want details. NPR. Available at

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kendall A. Taylor
    • 1
  1. 1.Hubert Humphrey Elementary SchoolAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations