Advertisement

Bounded Complexity of Bodily Realities: The (Dis)Embodiment of Elderly Lesbians

  • Bärbel S. Traunsteiner
  • Regine Bendl
Chapter

Abstract

This text analyses the current life conditions of homosexual women aged over 60 in terms of their structural (dis)embodiment and the bounded complexity of their bodily realities. Specifically, we consider their intersectional position along the following categories: (old) age, gender and sexual orientation. The data is drawn from narrative interviews with older lesbians living in Austria, framed methodically by the concept of life conditions and investigated using an analytical content method. Applying a general framework to analyse the bounded complexity of bodily realities, our data presents a broad picture of bodily imprints within the current lives of older lesbians in Austria.

References

  1. Acker, J. 1990. Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender and Society 4 (2): 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ———. 2006. Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society 20 (4): 441–464.Google Scholar
  3. Addis, S., M. Davies, G. Greene, S. MacBride-Stewart, and M. Shepherd. 2009. The health, social care and housing needs of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender older people: A review of the literature. Health & Social Care in the Community 17: 647–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen, K.R. 2005. Gay and lesbian elders. In The Cambridge handbook of age and ageing, ed. M.L. Johnson, 482–489. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amann, A. 2000. Sozialpolitik und Lebenslagen älterer Menschen. In Lebenslagen im Alter. Gesellschaftliche Bedingungen und Grenzen, ed. G.M. Backes and W. Clemens, 53–74. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Backes, G.M., and W. Clemens. 1998. Lebensphase Alter. Eine Einführung in die sozialwissenschaftliche Alternsforschung. Weinheim/München: Juventa.Google Scholar
  7. Barad, K. 1998. Getting real: Technoscientific practices and the materialization of reality. Differences 10 (2): 87–128.Google Scholar
  8. Bauer, W.T. 2009. Die Rechte Homosexueller im europäischen Vergleich. Unter Mitarbeit von Berger, A. and Hutter, C. Österreichische Gesellschaft für Politikberatung und Politikentwicklung – ÖGPP, eds. Wien. Access under www.boell-brandenburg.de/sites/default/files/uploads/2012/01/rechtehomosexueller.pdf (21 Oct 2017).
  9. Bendl, R. 2005. Revisiting organization theory. Integration and deconstruction of gender and transformation of organization theory. Frankfurt am Main/New York: Peter Lang Verlag.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 2008. Gender subtexts – Reproduction of exclusion in organizational discourse. British Journal of Management 19: 50–64.Google Scholar
  11. Benschop, Y., and H. Doorewaard. 1998. Covered by equality: The gender subtext of organizations. Organization Studies 19 (5): 787–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bochow, M. 2005. Ich bin doch schwul und will das immer bleiben. Schwule Männer im dritten Lebensalter. Hamburg: Männerschwarm Verlag.Google Scholar
  13. Braukmann, S., and U. Schmauch. 2007. Lesbische Frauen im Alter – ihre Lebenssituation und ihre spezifischen Bedürfnisse für ein altengerechtes Leben. Frankfurt: Forschungsberichte des gFFZ (gemeinsames Frauenforschungszentrum der Hessischen Fachhochschulen).Google Scholar
  14. Butler, J. 1993. Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of ‘sex’. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 1999. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge (first published 1990).Google Scholar
  16. Calás, M.B., & L. Smircich. 1987. Post-culture: Is the organizational culture literature dominant but dead? Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Organizational Symbolism and Corporate Culture, Milan, Italy.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 1996. From ‘the woman’s point of view: Feminist approaches to organization studies. In Handbook of organization studies, ed. S. Clegg, C. Hardy, and W. Nord, 218–257. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Calasanti, T.M., and K.F. Slevin. 2006. Introduction. In Age matters: Realigning feminist thinking, ed. T.M. Calasanti and K.F. Slevin, 1–18. New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  19. Cavarero, A. 1990. Die Perspektive der Geschlechterdifferenz. In Differenz und Gleichheit. Menschenrechte haben (k)ein Geschlecht, ed. U. Gerhard, M. Jansen, A. Maihofer, P. Schmid, and I. Schultz, 95–111. Frankfurt am Main: Ulrike Helmer Verlag.Google Scholar
  20. Colgan, F., and A. McKearney. 2012. Visibility and voice in organisations: Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered employee networks. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal 31 (4): 359–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Connell, R. 2010. Im Innern des gläsernen Turms: Die Konstruktion von Männlichkeiten im Finanzkapital. Feministische Studien Heft 1/2010: 8–24.Google Scholar
  22. Crenshaw, K. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex. A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. The University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989 (1): 139–167.Google Scholar
  23. Dale, K., and G. Burrell. 2000. What shape are we in? Organization theory and the organized body. In Body and organization, ed. J. Hassard, R. Holliday, and H. Willmott, 15–30. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Degele, N. 2008. Gender/Queer Studies: eine Einführung. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
  25. Federal Chancellery. 2017. Allgemeines zur eingetragenen Partnerschaft. Access under https://www.help.gv.at/Portal.Node/hlpd/public/content/189/Seite.1890100.html (13 Nov 2017).
  26. Fotaki, M. 2013. No woman is like a man (in academia): The masculine symbolic order and the unwanted female body. Organization Studies 34 (9): 1251–1275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fotaki, M., B.D. Metcalfe, and N. Harding. 2014. Writing materiality into management and organization studies through and with Luce Irigaray. Human Relations 67 (10): 1239–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Foucault, M. 1991. Überwachen und Strafen: die Geburt des Gefängnisses. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  29. Fredriksen-Goldsen, K.I., and A. Muraco. 2010. Aging and sexual orientation: A 25-year review of the literature. Research on Aging, 2010 32 (3): 372–413.Google Scholar
  30. Freeman, E. 2010. Time binds: Queer temporalities, queer histories. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Friend, R. A. 1987. The individual and social psychology of aging: Clinical implications for Lesbians and Gay Men. Journal of Homosexuality 14/1–2: 307–331. In Psychotherapy with homosexual men and women. Integrated identity approaches for clinical practice, ed. E. Coleman.Google Scholar
  32. Froschauer, U., and M. Lueger. 2003. Das qualitative interview. Wien: Facultas.Google Scholar
  33. Ginn, J., and S. Arber. 1995. “Only connect”: Gender relations and ageing. In Connecting gender and ageing: A sociological approach, ed. S. Arber and J. Ginn, 1–14. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Goffman, Erving. 1967. Stigma. Über Techniken der Bewältigung beschädigter Identität. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  35. Graefe, S. 2010. Altersidentität. zum theoretischen und empirischen Gebrauchswert einer prekären Kategorie. Mittelweg 36/Jg. 19 (5): 34–51.Google Scholar
  36. Grosz, E. 1994. Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Halberstam, J. 2005. In a queer time and place: Transgender bodies, subcultural lives. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Hall, S. 1994. Rassismus und kulturelle Identität. Ausgewählte Schriften Band 2. Hamburg: Argument.Google Scholar
  39. ———. 2009. Heteronormativität revisited. Komplexität und Grenzen einer Kategorie. In Queer Studies in Deutschland. Interdisziplinäre Beiträge zur kritischen Heteronormativitätsforschung, ed. A. Krass, 23–40. Berlin: trafo.Google Scholar
  40. Heaphy, Brian. 2007. Sexualities, gender and ageing. Resources and social change. Current Sociology 55: 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hoel, H., D. Lewis, and A. Einarsdottir. 2017. Debate: Bullying and harassment of lesbians, gay men and bisexual employees: Findings from a representative British national study. Public Money & Management 37 (5): 312–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hofmann, R., and A. Cserer. 2010. Lesben am Werk – Explorationsstudie zur Erwerbstätigkeit lesbischer Frauen in Österreich. Wien: WU Wien, Projektbericht.Google Scholar
  43. Holvino, E. 2010. Intersections: The simultaneity of race, gender and class in organization studies. Gender, Work & Organizations 17 (3): 248–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ilga. 2017a. Sexual orientation laws in the world – Recognition. Access under https://ilga.org/downloads/2017/ILGA_WorldMap_ENGLISH_Recognition_2017.pdf
  45. ———. 2017b. Sexual orientation laws in the world – Criminalisation. Access under https://ilga.org/downloads/2017/ILGA_WorldMap_ENGLISH_Criminalisation_2017.pdf
  46. Jones, B.E. 2001. Is having the luck of growing old in the gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender community good or bad luck? In Midlife and aging in gay America. Proceedings of the SAGE conference 2000, ed. D.C. Kimmel and D.L. Martin, 13–14. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Kehoe, M. 1989. Lesbians over 60 speak for themselves. Journal of Homosexuality 16: 3–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kenny, K., and M. Fotaki. 2015. From gendered organizations to compassionate borderspaces: Reading corporeal ethics with Bracha Ettinger. Organization 22 (2): 183–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. King, A. 2016. Queer categories: Queer(y)ing the identification ‘older lesbian, gay and/or bisexual (LGB) adults’ and its implications for organizational research, policy and practice. Gender, Work and Organization 23 (1): 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Klesse, C. 2007. Heteronormativität und qualitative Forschung. Methodische Überlegungen. In Heteronormativität. Empirische Studien zu Geschlecht, Sexualität und Macht, ed. J. Hartmann, C. Klesse, P. Wagenknecht, B. Fritzsche, and K. Hackmann, 35–51. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  51. Kohli, M. 2013. Alter und Altern der Gesellschaft. In Handwörterbuch zur Gesellschaft Deutschlands, ed. M. Steffen and N.M. Schöneck, 11–24. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Köllen, T., ed. 2016. Sexual orientation and transgender issues in organizations – Global perspectives on LGBT workforce diversity. Heidelberg/New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  53. Kooden, H. 2000. Golden men. The power of gay midlife. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  54. Krell, C. 2014. Alter und Altern bei Homosexuellen. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.Google Scholar
  55. Lottmann, R., and R. Lautmann. 2015. Queer und Alter(n) – zum Forschungsstand. In Selbstbestimmung und Anerkennung sexueller und geschlechtlicher Vielfalt, ed. F. Schmidt, A.-C. Schondelmayer, and U.B. Schröder, 337–354. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  56. Martin, J. 1990. Deconstructing organizational Taboos: The suppression of gender conflict in organizations. Organization Science 1 (4): 339–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Muhr, S.L., K.R. Sullivan, and C. Rich. 2016. Situated Transgressiveness: Exploring one Transwoman’s lived experiences across three situated contexts. Gender, Work & Organization 23: 52–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Neuberg, S. 2002. Älter werden – Ältere Lesben und Schwule in Berlin. In Anders sein und älter werden. Lesben und Schwule im Alter, ed. Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Sport. Dokumentation der Fachtagung vom 22./23.11.2002. Berlin, 77–125. Access under www.berlin.de/imperia/md/content/lb_ads/gglw/veroeffentlichungen/doku20_alter_bf.pdf?start&ts=1304512902&file=doku20_alter_bf.pdf (21 Oct 2017).
  59. Ozturk, M.B., and N. Rumens. 2015. Sexual minorities in the workplace. In Managing diversity and inclusion: An international perspective, ed. J. Syed and M. Ozbilgin, 265–287. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  60. Plötz, K. 2006. Lesbische ALTERnativen. Alltagsleben, Erwartungen, Wünsche. Königstein/Taunus: Ulrike Helmer.Google Scholar
  61. Pullen, A., and D. Knights. 2007. Editorial: Undoing gender: Organizing and disorganizing performance. Gender, Work and Organization 14 (6): 505–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pullen, A., C. Rhodes, and T. Thanem. 2017. Affective politics in gendered organizations: Affirmative notes on becoming-woman. Organization 24 (1): 105–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pulver, M. 2015. Anders Altern. Zur aktuellen Lebenslage von Schwulen und Lesben im Alter. In Selbstbestimmung und Anerkennung sexueller und geschlechtlicher Vielfalt, ed. F. Schmidt, A.-C. Schondelmayer, and U.B. Schröder, 303–318. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  64. Reimann, K., and V. Lasch. 2006. Differenzierte Lebenslagen im Alter. Der Einfluss sexueller Orientierung am Beispiel homosexueller Männer. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie 39 (1): 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Riach, K., N. Rumens, and M. Tyler. 2014. Un/doing chrononormativity: Negotiating ageing, gender and sexuality in organizational life. Organization Studies 35: 1677–1698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Richter, A. 2012. Age matters! Intersectionality too! In Moderne – Kulturwissenschaftliches Jahrbuch, 123–136. Innsbruck/Wien/Bozen: Studien- Verlag, Nr. 6 (2010/11).Google Scholar
  67. Rowan, N.L., and S.S. Butler. 2014. Resilience in attaining and sustaining sobriety among older lesbians with alcoholism. Journal of Gerontological Social Work 57 (2–4): 176–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schäffer-Ziegler, S. 2000. Die Strafbarkeit „widernatürlicher Unzucht”. Ein Strafbestand von der Constitutio Criminalis Theresiana bis zur kleinen Strafrechtsreform 1971. In Sexualstrafrecht. Beiträge zum historischen und aktuellen Reformprozess, ed. U. Flossmann, 129–189. Linz: Trauner.Google Scholar
  69. Schnell, R., P.B. Hill, and E. Esser. 1999. Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. München/Wien: Oldenburg.Google Scholar
  70. Schroeter, K.R., and H. Künemund. 2010. „Alter“ als Soziale Konstruktion – eine soziologische Einführung. In Handbuch Soziale Arbeit und Alter, ed. K. Aner and U. Karl, 393–401. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schütze, F. 1983. Biographieforschung und narratives Interview. Neue Praxis 13 (3): 283–293.Google Scholar
  72. Sdun, B. 2009. Die Lebenslage älterer und pflegebedürftiger Lesben und Schwuler. Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung alternativer Wohnangebote. Berlin: Lit-Verlag.Google Scholar
  73. Singer, M. 2005. Geteilte Wahrheit. Feministische Epistemologe, Wissenssoziologie und Cultural Studies. Wien: Löcker.Google Scholar
  74. Souza, E., J. Brewis, and N. Rumens. 2016. Gender, the body and organization studies: Que(e)rying empirical research. Gender, Work & Organization 23 (6): 600–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Traunsteiner, B. 2014. Alter(n), Geschlecht und sexuelle Orientierung. Gleichgeschlechtlich l(i)ebende Frauen in der dritten Lebensphase und ihre Antizipationen zum eigenen Altern. In Elder Care: Intersektionelle Analysen der informellen Betreuung und Pflege alter Menschen in Österreich, ed. E. Appelt, E. Fleischer, and M. Preglau, 147–162. Innsbruck: Studien-Verlag.Google Scholar
  76. Traunsteiner, B.S. 2015. Gleichgeschlechtlich l(i)ebende Frauen im Alter. Intersektionalität, Lebenslagen und Antidiskriminierungsempfehlungen. Universität Klagenfurt, Dissertation.Google Scholar
  77. van Dyk, S. 2016. Doing age? Diversität und Alter(n) im flexiblen Kapitalismus. Zur Norm der Alterslosigkeit und ihren Kehrseiten. In Managing diversity. Die diversitätsbewusste Ausrichtung des Bildungs- und Kulturwesens, der Wirtschaft und Verwaltung, ed. K. Fereidooni and A.P. Zeoli, 67–88. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  78. VfGH. 2002. Decision Nr. G6/02 from the 21.06.2002. Access under www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/Vfgh/JFT_09979379_02G00006_00/JFT_09979379_02G00006_00.pdf (21 Oct 2017).
  79. Walgenbach, K. 2012. Intersektionalität – eine Einführung. Access under http://portalintersektionalitaet.de/theoriebildung/schluesseltexte/walgenbach-einfuehrung/ (21 Oct 2017).
  80. Warner, M. 1991. Introduction. Fear of a Queer Planet. Social Text 29: 3–17.Google Scholar
  81. Welch, S., P. Howden-Chapman, and S.C. Collings. 1998. Survey of drug and alcohol use by lesbian women in New Zealand. Addictive Behaviors 23: 543–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. West, C., and S. Fenstermaker. 1995. Doing difference. Gender & Society 9: 8–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. West, C., and D.H. Zimmerman. 1987. Doing gender. Gender & Society 1 (2): 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Winker, G., and N. Degele. 2009. Intersektionalität. Zur Analyse sozialer Ungleichheiten. Bielefeld: Transcript-Verlag.Google Scholar
  85. Wright, T., F. Colgan, C. Creegany, and A. McKearney. 2006. Lesbian, gay and bisexual workers: Equality, diversity and inclusion in the workplace. Equal Opportunities International 25 (6): 465–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Gender and Diversity in Organizations, Department of ManagementVienna University of Economics and BusinessWienAustria

Personalised recommendations