Advertisement

Embodying the Social: Desire and Devo(r)ation at the Teatro Oficina

  • Gazi Islam
Chapter

Abstract

The Teat(r)o Oficina Uzyna Uzona organizes bodily performance in an affect-rich, interactive, and politically charged style described as “anthropophagic”. Drawing on the anthropophagy trope, I argue that thinking about organizing anthropophagically provides new ways of approaching bodies and affect, thinking about subjectivity relationally, and situating self and other in an intimate yet ambivalent encounter. Using the Teat(r)o Oficina Uzyna Uzona as a case, I illustrate the broad features of anthropophagic organizing, pointing to the organizational, social, and political implications of anthropophagic relationality. Engaging with Oficina’s unique style and forms of embodiment helps us to imagine how bodies and affect can be used creatively to establish a performative politics, marked by affective intensity and participative presence.

References

  1. Andrade, O. 1928. Manifesto Antropófago. Revista de Antropofagia 1 (1).Google Scholar
  2. ———. 1954. “Comunicacão escrita para o Encontro dos Intelectuais”, realizado no Rio de Janeiro, em, e enviada ao pintor modernista Di Cavalcanti para ser lida. Rio de Janeiro: IEL – Unicamp.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 1990. A Utopia Antropofagica: Obras completas de Oswald de Andrade. São Paulo: Globo.Google Scholar
  4. Appadurai, A. 1990. Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. Public Culture 2 (2): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashforth, B.E., K.M. Rogers, and K.G. Corley. 2011. Identity in organizations: Exploring cross-level dynamics. Organization Science 22 (5): 1144–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Azevedo, B. 2016. Antropofagia: palimpsesto selvagem. São Paulo: Cosac Naify.Google Scholar
  7. Ball, K. 2006. Organization, surveillance and the body: Towards a politics of resistance. Organization 12 (1): 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beyes, T. 2015. Fictions of the possible: Art, the city, and public entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Inquiry 24 (4): 445–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beyes, T., and C. Steyaert. 2006. Justifying theatre in organisational analysis: A Carnivalesque alternative? Consumption Markets & Culture 9 (2): 101–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boltanski, L., and E. Chiapello. 2005. The new spirit of capitalism. London/New York: Verso.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Borón, A. 1999. State decay and democratic decadence in Latin America. In The socialist register 1999: Global capitalism versus democracy, ed. L. Panitch and C. Leys. London: Merlin Press.Google Scholar
  12. Butler, J. 2015. Notes toward a performative theory of assembly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Butler, J., and A. Athanasiou. 2013. Dispossession: The performative in the political. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  14. Caldeira, Teresa P.R. 2000. City of walls: Crime, segregation, and citizenship in São Paulo. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Campbell, P. 2011. Subjetividade processual pos-colonial em os sertoes do oficina. Repertorio 16: 70–93.Google Scholar
  16. Campos, H., and M.T. Wolff. 1985. The rule of anthropophagy: Europe under the sign of devoration. Latin American Literary Review 14 (27): 42–60.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 2012. “Traces of the (m)other: Deconstructing hegemonic historical narrative”. In Teat(r)o Oficina Uzyna Uzona’s Os Sertões. Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies 21 (2): 287–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Casanova, E.M., and A. Jafar. 2016. The body as a site of resistance. In The Sage handbook of resistance, ed. D. Courpasson and S. Vallas, 139–153. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Conklin, B.A. 2001. Consuming grief. Compassionate cannibalism in an Amazonian society. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  20. Contu, A. 2008. Decaf resistance. Management Communication Quarterly 21: 364–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dacin, M.T., K. Munir, and P. Tracey. 2010. Formal dining at Cambridge colleges: Linking ritual performance and institutional maintenance. Academy of Management Journal 53 (6): 1393–1418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Della, B., and T. Carvalho. 2013. Desventuras da subversão: Oswald de Andrade, o Teatro Oficina e os dois momentos de O Rei da Vela. PROA – Revista de Antropologia E Arte 1 (4).Google Scholar
  23. Di Domenico, M., and N. Phillips. 2009. Sustaining the ivory tower: Oxbridge formal dining as organizational ritual. Journal of Management Inquiry 18 (4): 326–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Diprose, M. 2002. Corporeal generosity: On giving with Nietzsche, Merleau-Ponty and Lévinas. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  25. Dolan, J., and S. Wolf. 2014. Performing desire. TDR: The Drama Review 58 (4): 9–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dunn, C. 2001. Brutality garden: Tropicalia and the emergence of a Brazilian counterculture. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. ———. 2016. Contracultura alternative arts and social transformation in authoritarian Brazil. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  28. Fotaki, M. 2011. The sublime object of desire (for knowledge): Sexuality at work in business and management schools in England. British Journal of Management 22 (1): 42–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Foucault, M. 1998. The history of sexuality volume I: The will to knowledge. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  30. Fraser, N. 2014. Translationalizing the public sphere. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Gatrell, C. 2011. Managing the maternal body: A comprehensive review and transdisciplinary analysis. International Journal of Management Reviews 13 (1): 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gherardi, S., and G. Rodeschini. 2016. Caring as a collective knowledgeable doing: About concern and being concerned. Management Learning 47 (3): 266–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Graeber, D. 2007. On the phenomenology of giant puppets. In Possibilities: Essays on hierarchy, rebellion, and desire, 375–418. Oakland: AK Press.Google Scholar
  34. Haug, C. 2013. Organizing spaces: Meeting arenas as a social movement infrastructure between organization, network, and institution. Organization Studies 34 (5–6): 705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hekman, S. 1992. The embodiment of the subject: Feminism and the communitarian critique of liberalism. The Journal of Politics 54 (4): 1098–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Islam, G. 2012. Can the subaltern eat? Anthropophagic culture as a Brazilian lens on postcolonial theory. Organization 19 (2): 159–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. ———. 2014. Appropriating the abject: An anthropophagic approach to organizational diversity. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal 33 (7): 595–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. ———. 2015. A taste for otherness: Anthropophagy and the embodied self in organizations. Scandinavian Journal of Management 31 (3): 351–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Islam, G., M.J. Zyphur, and D. Boje. 2008. Carnival and spectacle in Krewe de Vieux and the Mystic Krewe of Spermes: The mingling of organization and celebration. Organization Studies 29: 1565–1589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jameson, F. 1989. Nostalgia for the present. South Atlantic Quarterly 88 (2): 517–537.Google Scholar
  41. Kenny, K., and M. Fotaki. 2015. From gendered organizations to compassionate borderspaces: Reading corporeal ethics with Bracha Ettinger. Organization 22 (2): 183–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Küpers, W. 2013. A phenomenology of embodied senses: The “making” of sense in organisational culture. International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion 5 (4): 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Latour, B. 2004. Whose cosmos, which cosmopolitics? Common Knowledge 10 (3): 450–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lima, R.N. 2001. Teatro oficina atento ao momento politico. Trans/Form/Ação 24: 9–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lima, E.M.F. 2002. Relações com experiências limites no processo comunicacional : uma pequena incongruência no Palco do Oficina. Communicacão, Saude & Educacão 6 (10): 135–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mostaço, E. 1982. Teatro e política: Arena, Oficina e Opinião. São Paulo: Proposta Editorial.Google Scholar
  47. Nunes, Z. 2008. Cannibal democracy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  48. Oliveira, F., G. Islam, and M. Toraldo. 2017. Multimodal imaginaries and the “Big Worm”: Materialities, artefacts and analogies in São Paulo’s urban renovation. In Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 54A, 27–62. London: Emerald.Google Scholar
  49. Patriota, R. 2003. A cena tropicalista no Teatro Oficina de São Paulo. Historia, Sao Paulo 22 (1): 135–163.Google Scholar
  50. Paulson, S. 2006. Revolution, neoliberalism, and cosmopolitics: Body, nation, and consubstantiation in Bolivian ritual meals. American Ethnologist 33 (4): 650–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Prado, P., and J. Sapsed. 2016. The anthropophagic organization: How innovations transcend the temporary in a project-based organization. Organization Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616655491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pullen, A., and C. Rhodes. 2015. Ethics, embodiment and organizations. Organization 22 (2): 159–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ramos-Zayas, A. 2011. Affect learning affect/embodying race. In A companion to the anthropology of the body and embodiment, ed. F.E. Mascia-Lees, 24–45. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rennstam, J., and K.L. Ashcraft. 2013. Knowing work: Cultivating a practice-based epistemology of knowledge in organization studies. Human Relations 67 (1): 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rolnick, S. 1998. Anthropophagic subjectivity. In Arte Contemporanea Brasileira: Um e/entre Outro/s. São Paulo: Fundacão Bienal de São Paulo.Google Scholar
  56. Rosa, C.F. 2015. Brazilian bodies and their choreographies of identification: Swing nation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schechner, R. 2014. Performed imaginaries. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schreyogg, G., and H. Höpfl. 2004. Theatre and organization: Editorial introduction. Organization Studies 25 (5): 691–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Simpson, R., K. Irvine, M. Balta, and K. Dickson. 2015. Emotions, performance and entrepreneurship in the context of fringe theatre. Organization 22 (1): 100–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sousa, M.A.R. 2013. Quando Corpos se Fazem Arte: Uma etnografia sobre o Teatro Oficina. Masters theses, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.Google Scholar
  61. Stevens, J. 2015. Theatre city: On design in the interplay of social and material space (Teatro Oficina, Bixiga, São Paulo). Culture and Local Governance 5 (2): 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Taussig, M. 2012. I’m so angry I made a sign. Critical Inquiry 39 (1): 56–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Thanem, T. 2004. The body without organs: Nonorganizational desire in organizational life. Culture and Organization 10: 203–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. ———. 2006. Living on the edge: Towards a monstrous organization theory. Organization 13 (2): 163–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. ———. 2012. All talk and no movement? Homeless coping and resistance to urban planning. Organization 19 (4): 441–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Toraldo, M.L., and G. Islam. 2017. Festival and organization studies. Organization Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617727785.
  67. Troi, M., and L. Colling. 2017. Antropofagia, Dissidências E Novas Práticas: O Teatro Oficina. Revista Ambivalências 4 (8): 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Vachhani, S.J. 2014. Always different?: Exploring the monstrous-feminine and maternal embodiment in organisation. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal 33 (7): 648–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Veloso, C. 2004. Verdade tropical. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.Google Scholar
  70. Vilaça, A. 2002. Making kin out of others in Amazonia. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 8 (2): 347–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Viveiros de Castro, E. 1998. Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4 (3): 469–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. ———. 2009. Metaphysiques cannibales. Paris: Presse Universite de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Warhurst, C., and D. Nickson. 2007. A new labour aristocracy? Aesthetic labour and routine interactive service. Work, Employment & Society 21 (4): 785–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Washburn, M. 2003. Embodied spirituality in a sacred world. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  75. Watson, M.C. 2011. Cosmopolitics and the subaltern: Problematizing Latour’s idea of the commons. Theory, Culture & Society 28 (3): 55–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wood, T., and M. Caldas. 1998. Antropofagia organizacional. Revista de Administracão de Empresas 38 (4): 6–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Grenoble Ecole de ManagementGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations