Introducing Affective Embodiment and Diversity
This occurs against the revelations about the widespread sexual harassment and persisting inequalities in the workplace such as gender pay gap and the absence of women and minoritized others from positions of power. Simultaneously, there has been a powerful backlash against women’s empowerment taking the form of anti-gender and postfeminist discourses. We argue that the approach to equal opportunities in the workplace emerging from the liberal, free market conception of employment fails to address the root causes of discrimination because gender and other inequalities are often necessary for sustaining and strengthening the global capital accumulation. This edited collection offers an affective embodiment as a central practice and concept to problematize diversity. Without understanding how embodied differences are conditioned and reproduced, we might be unable to address inequalities in organizations.
- American Association of University Women (AAUW). 2016. The simple truth about the gender pay gap. Washington, DC: AAUW.Google Scholar
- Andrade, O. 1954. Comunicação escrita para o Encontro dos Intelectuais, realizado no Rio de Janeiro, em 1954, e enviada ao pintor modernista Di Cavalcanti para ser lida. IEL - Unicamp.Google Scholar
- Bion, W. 1962. Learning from experience. London: William Heinemann Medical Books Ltd.Google Scholar
- Boll, C., Leppin, J., Rossen, A., and Wolf, A. 2016. Magnitude and impact factors of the gender pay gap in EU countries. Report prepared for the European Commission. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
- Crenshaw, K. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics, 139–167. Chicago: University of Chicago Legal Forum.Google Scholar
- Dale, K., and G. Burrell. 2000. What shape are we in? Organization theory and the organized body. In Body and organization, ed. J. Hassard, R. Holliday, and H. Willmott, 15–30. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Daskalaki, M., and M. Fotaki. 2017. The neoliberal crisis: Alternative organizing and spaces of/for feminist solidarity. In Feminists and queer theorists debate the future of critical management studies, Dialogue sin critical management studies, ed. A. Pullen, N. Harding, and M. Phillips, vol. 3, 1–11, 129–153. Emerald Publishing. Bingley: UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dhaliwal, S., and N. Yuval-Davis. 2014. Women against fundamentalism. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
- Diprose, R. 1994. The bodies of women: Ethics, embodiment and sexual difference. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- ———. 2002. Corporeal generosity: On giving with Nietzsche, Merleau-Ponty and Levinas. New York: SUNY.Google Scholar
- Fotaki, M., and N. Harding. 2018. Gender and the organization. Women at work in the 21st century. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Gatrell, C. 2017. Boundary creatures? Employed, breastfeeding mothers and ‘abjection as practice’. Organization Studies, https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617736932.
- Grosz, E. 1994. Volatile bodies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- Hunt, V., Layton, D., and Prince, S. 2015. Diversity Matters. McKinsey. Available at https://assets.mckinsey.com/~/media/857F440109AA4D13A54D9C496D86ED58.ashx. Last accessed 22 July 2018.
- Kabeer, N. 2012. Women’s economic empowerment and inclusive growth: Labour markets and enterprise development. SIG working paper 2012/1. Ottawa: IDRC. Available at: https://www.idrc.ca/sites/default/files/sp/Documents%20EN/NK-WEE-Concept-Paper.pdf. Accessed 22 July 2018.
- Kenny, K., and M. Fotaki, eds. 2014. The psychosocial and organization studies: Affect at work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Kenny, K., S. Muhr, and L. Olaison. 2011. The effect of affect: Desire and politics in modern organization. Ephemera 11 (3): 235–242.Google Scholar
- Krell, C. 2004. Alter und Altern bei Homosexuellen. Basel: Weinheim.Google Scholar
- Kuhar, R., and D. Paternotte. 2017. Anti-gender campaigns in Europe mobilizing against equality. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Massumi, B. 1996. The autonomy of affect. In Deleuze, G. A critical reader, ed. P. Patton, 217–239. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- McRobbie, A. 2009. The aftermath of feminism: Gender, culture and social change. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Moghadam, V. 2005. Globalizing women: Transnational feminist networks. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Mohanty, C.T. 1998. Crafting feminist genealogy: On the geography and politics of home, nation, and community. In Talking visions: Multicultural feminism in a transnational age, ed. E. Shotat, 485–500. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- ———. 2015. Spatial justice: Body, Lawscape, atmosphere. London: Routledge.Google Scholar