Cervical Posterior Long Construct Stabilization

  • Lukas Bobinski


The cervical spine sustains the horizontal gaze and supports the mass of the head. It has widest range of motion comparison to the rest of the spine. Authors describe a case of highly unstable cervical fracture due to ankylosing spondylitis successfully treated with long-posterior fixation bridging across the cervicothoracic junction. Indications, preparations, technical aspects of the posterior cervical long stabilization as well as medical considerations are described in step-by-step fashion.


  1. 1.
    Vaccaro AR, Koerner JD, Radcliff KE, et al. AOSpine subaxial cervical spine injury classification system. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(7):2173–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Westerveld LA, van Bemmel JC, Dhert WJ, Oner FC, Verlaan JJ. Clinical outcome after traumatic spinal fractures in patients with ankylosing spinal disorders compared with control patients. Spine J. 2014;14(5):729–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Caron T, Bransford R, Nguyen Q, Agel J, Chapman J, Bellabarba C. Spine fractures in patients with ankylosing spinal disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(11):E458–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kirkpatrick JS, Levy JA, Carillo J, Moeini SR. Reconstruction after multilevel corpectomy in the cervical spine. A sagittal plane biomechanical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24(12):1186–90; discussion 1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Singh K, Vaccaro AR, Kim J, Lorenz EP, Lim TH, An HS. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(20):2352–8; discussion 2358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schroeder GD, Kepler CK, Kurd MF, et al. Is it necessary to extend a multilevel posterior cervical decompression and fusion to the upper thoracic spine? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(23):1845–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Osterhoff G, Ryang YM, von Oelhafen J, Meyer B, Ringel F. Posterior multilevel instrumentation of the lower cervical spine: is bridging the cervicothoracic junction necessary? World Neurosurg. 2017;103:419–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yoshihara H, Passias PG, Errico TJ. Screw-related complications in the subaxial cervical spine with the use of lateral mass versus cervical pedicle screws: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19(5):614–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Johnston TL, Karaikovic EE, Lautenschlager EP, Marcu D. Cervical pedicle screws vs. lateral mass screws: uniplanar fatigue analysis and residual pullout strengths. Spine J. 2006;6(6):667–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Abumi K, Ito M, Sudo H. Reconstruction of the subaxial cervical spine using pedicle screw instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(5):E349–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ito Y, Sugimoto Y, Tomioka M, Hasegawa Y, Nakago K, Yagata Y. Clinical accuracy of 3D fluoroscopy-assisted cervical pedicle screw insertion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008;9(5):450–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Truumees E, Singh D, Geck MJ, Stokes JK. Should long-segment cervical fusions be routinely carried into the thoracic spine? A multicenter analysis. Spine J. 2018;18(5):782–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lukas Bobinski
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OrthopedicsSpine Unit, Umeå University HospitalUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations