Advertisement

Spine Surgery pp 489-493 | Cite as

In Situ Fusion Versus Realignment

  • Lars WesselsEmail author
  • Peter Vajkoczy
Chapter

Abstract

Lumbar spondylolisthesis is a very common condition in the population above 50, which often results in spinal stenosis accompanied by lower back pain and neurogenic claudication. If degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis is symptomatic, surgical treatment is associated with a more favorable outcome than non-surgical treatment and should be the treatment of choice [11]. In contrast to low grade spondylolisthesis the treatment of high grade spondylolisthesis (>50%) is controversial. The two surgical concepts of in situ fusion and realignment are still a matter of some debate. In situ fusion should be considered when sagittal balance is not impaired. Realignment should be the treatment of choice if sagittal imbalance has to be corrected, or in younger individuals where it should be prevented.

References

  1. 1.
    Försth P, Ólafsson G, Carlsson T, Frost A, Borgström F, Fritzell P, Öhagen P, Michaëlsson K, Sandén B. A randomized, controlled trial of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(15):1413–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gandhoke GS, Kasliwal MK, Smith JS, Nieto J, Ibrahimi D, Park P, Lamarca F, Shaffrey C, Okonkwo DO, Kanter AS. A multicenter evaluation of clinical and radiographic outcomes following high-grade spondylolisthesis reduction and fusion. Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30(4):E363–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ghogawala Z, Dziura J, Butler WE, Dai F, Terrin N, Magge SN, Coumans JV, Harrington JF, Amin-Hanjani S, Schwartz JS, Sonntag VK, Barker FG 2nd, Benzel EC. Laminectomy plus fusion versus laminectomy alone for lumbar spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(15):1424–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hanson DS, Bridwell KH, Rhee JM, Lenke LG. Correlation of pelvic incidence with low- and high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine. 2002;27(18):2026–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Inage K, Orita S, Yamauchi K, Suzuki M, Sakuma Y, Kubota G, Oikawa Y, Sainoh T, Sato J, Fujimoto K, Shiga Y, Abe K, Kanamoto H, Inoue M, Kinoshita H, Norimoto M, Umimura T, Takahashi K, Ohtori S. Long-term outcomes of in situ fusion for treating dysplastic spondylolisthesis. Asian Spine J. 2017;11(2):213–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Labelle H, Mac-Thiong J-M, Roussouly P. Spino-pelvic sagittal balance of spondylolisthesis: a review and classification. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(S5):641–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Longo UG, Loppini M, Romeo G, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Evidence-based surgical management of spondylolisthesis: reduction or arthrodesis in situ. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(1):53–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Passias P, Poorman C, Yang S, Boniello A, Jalai C, Worley N, Lafage V. Surgical treatment strategies for high-grade spondylolisthesis: a systematic review. Int J Spine Surg. 2015;9:50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rajakumar DV, Hari A, Krishna M, Sharma A, Reddy M. Complete anatomic reduction and monosegmental fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis of Grade II and higher: use of the minimally invasive “rocking” technique. Neurosurg Focus. 2017;43(2):E12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vialle R, Ilharreborde B, Dauzac C, Lenoir T, Rillardon L, Guigui P. Is there a sagittal imbalance of the spine in isthmic spondylolisthesis? A correlation study. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(10):1641–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Hanscom B, Tosteson ANA, Blood EA, Birkmeyer NJ, Hilibrand AS, Herkowitz H, Cammisa FP, Albert TJ, Emery SE, Lenke LG, Abdu WA, Longley M, Errico TJ, Hu SS. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(22):2257–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryCharitè – Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations