Advertisement

Spine Surgery pp 465-472 | Cite as

Instrumentation Techniques Including Sacral and Pelvic Fixation

  • Yann Philippe CharlesEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Lumbar degenerative scoliosis and anterior imbalance represent common spinal deformities in the aging population. Surgical treatment might be considered if conservative treatment remains inefficient on low back and leg pain and in progressive trunk imbalance. Adult spinal deformity associated with imbalance has an impact on health-related quality of life (QoL). Correction of sagittal imbalance can be performed with surgical techniques such as Smith-Petersen or Ponte osteotomies in deformities where the intersomatic space remains mobile, whereas a pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is usually indicated in severe rigid deformities.

References

  1. 1.
    Smith JS, Klineberg E, Schwab F, Shaffrey CI, Moal B, Ames CP, Hostin R, Fu KM, Burton D, Akbarnia B, Gupta M, Hart R, Bess S, Lafage V, International Spine Study Group. Change in classification grade by the SRS-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification predicts impact on health-related quality of life measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(19):1663–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schwab F, Blondel B, Bess S, Hostin R, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, Boachie-Adjei O, Burton DC, Akbarnia BA, Mundis GM, Ames CP, Kebaish K, Hart RA, Farcy JP, Lafage V, International Spine Study Group. Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity. A prospective multicenter analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(13):E803–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Enercan M, Ozturk C, Kahraman S, Sarier M, Hamzaoglu A, Alanay A. Osteotomies/spinal column resections in adult deformity. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(Suppl 2):S254–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kelly MP, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Agarwal R, Godzik J, Koester L. Fate of the adult revision spinal deformity patient: a single institution experience. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(19):E1196–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhu F, Bao H, Liu Z, Bentley M, Zhu Z, Ding Y, Qiu Y. Unanticipated revision surgery in adult spinal deformity: an experience with 815 cases at one institution. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). (2014);39(26 Spec No):B36–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Steib JP, Dumas R, Mitton D, Skalli W. Surgical correction of scoliosis by in situ contouring: a detorsion analysis. Spine. 2004;29(2):193–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Finger T, Bayerl S, Onken J, Czabanka M, Woitzik J, Vajkoczy P. Sacropelvic fixation versus fusion to the sacrum for spondylodesis in multilevel degenerative spine disease. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(5):1013–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Volkheimer D, Reichel H, Wilke HJ, Lattig F. Is pelvic fixation the only option to provide additional stability to the sacral anchorage in long lumbar instrumentation? A comparative biomechanical study of new techniques. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2017;43:34–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Banno T, Hasegawa T, Yamato Y, Kobayashi S, Togawa D, Oe S, Mihara Y, Matsuyama Y. The prevalence and risk factors of iliac screw loosening after adult spinal deformity surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42(17):E1024–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Koller H, Zenner J, Hempfing A, Ferraris L, Meier O. Reinforcement of lumbosacral instrumentation using S1-pedicle screws combined with S2-alar screws. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2013;25(3):294–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Charles YP, Khelifi A, Schaeffer SJP. Pseudarthrosis in scoliosis instrumented to the sacrum and the pelvis. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(11):3015.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J. Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(3):346–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sebaaly A, Riouallon G, Obeid I, Grobost P, Rizkallah M, Laouissat F, Charles YP, Roussouly P. Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult scoliosis: comparison of four radiological predictor models. Eur Spine J. 2018;27(3):613–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yilgor C, Sogunmez N, Boissiere L, Yavuz Y, Obeid I, Kleinstück F, FJS P-G, Acaroglu E, Haddad S, Mannion AF, Pellise F, Alanay A, European Spine Study Group (ESSG). Global alignment and proportion (GAP) score: development and validation of a new method of analyzing spinopelvic alignment to predict mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(19):1661–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Service de Chirurgie du Rachis, Hôpitaux Universitaires de StrasbourgStrasbourgFrance

Personalised recommendations