Advertisement

Spine Surgery pp 459-464 | Cite as

Technical Execution of Correction Osteotomies (SPO, PSO, etc.)

  • Florian RingelEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Spinal osteotomies are gaining increasing importance and utilization during recent years. Several factors contribute to this increase. This chapter aims to provide an overview on the classification and execution of osteotomies for deformity correction.

References and Level of Evidence (EBM)

  1. 1.
    Ames CP, Smith JS, Scheer JK, Shaffrey CI, Lafage V, Deviren V, Moal B, Protopsaltis T, Mummaneni PV, Mundis GM Jr, Hostin R, Klineberg E, Burton DC, Hart R, Bess S, Schwab FJ, International Spine Study Group. A standardized nomenclature for cervical spine soft-tissue release and osteotomy for deformity correction: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19(3):269–78. EBM IVPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berjano P, Cecchinato R, Damilano M, Morselli C, Sansone V, Lamartina C. Preoperative calculation of the necessary correction in sagittal imbalance surgery: validation of three predictive methods. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(Suppl 6):S847–52. EBM IVCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cecchinato R, Berjano P, Aguirre MF, Lamartina C. Asymmetrical pedicle subtraction osteotomy in the lumbar spine in combined coronal and sagittal imbalance. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(Suppl 1):S66–71. EBM VCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Diebo BG, Henry J, Lafage V, Berjano P. Sagittal deformities of the spine: factors influencing the outcomes and complications. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(Suppl 1):S3–15. EBM VCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Diebo B, Liu S, Lafage V, Schwab F. Osteotomies in the treatment of spinal deformities: indications, classification, and surgical planning. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014;24(Suppl 1):S11–20. EBM VCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Diebo BG, Jalai CM, Challier V, et al. Novel index to quantify the risk of surgery in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a study on 10,912 patients from the nationwide inpatient sample. Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30(7):E993–9. EBM IIICrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Diebo BG, Lafage V, Varghese JJ, Gupta M, Kim HJ, Ames C, Kebaish K, Shaffrey C, Hostin R, Obeid I, Burton D, Hart RA, Lafage R, Schwab FJ, International Spine Study Group (ISSG) of Denver, Colorado. After 9 years of 3-column osteotomies, are we doing better? Performance curve analysis of 573 surgeries with 2-year follow-up. Neurosurgery. 2018;83(1):69–75. EBM IIIGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Enercan M, Ozturk C, Kahraman S, Sarıer M, Hamzaoglu A, Alanay A. Osteotomies/spinal column resections in adult deformity. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(Suppl 2):S254–64. EBM VCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lafage V, Smith JS, Bess S, Schwab FJ, Ames CP, Klineberg E, Arlet V, Hostin R, Burton DC, Shaffrey CI, International Spine Study Group. Sagittal spino-pelvic alignment failures following three column thoracic osteotomy for adult spinal deformity. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(4):698–704. EBM IVGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Le Huec JC, Leijssen P, Duarte M, Aunoble S. Thoracolumbar imbalance analysis for osteotomy planification using a new method: FBI technique. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(Suppl 5):669–80. EBM IVCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Le Huec JC, Faundez A, Dominguez D, Hoffmeyer P, Aunoble S. Evidence showing the relationship between sagittal balance and clinical outcomes in surgical treatment of degenerative spinal diseases: a literature review. Int Orthop. 2015;39(1):87–95. EBM IIIGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J. Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine. 2005;30(3):346–53. EBM IIICrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco JL. Sagittal parameters of the spine: biomechanical approach. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(Suppl 5):578–85. EBM VCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thambiraj S, Boszczyk BM. Asymmetric osteotomy of the spine for coronal imbalance: a technical report. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(Suppl 2):S225–9. EBM VCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schwab F, Blondel B, Chay E, et al. The comprehensive anatomical spinal osteotomy classification. Neurosurgery. 2014;74(1):112–20. EBM IIIGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryUniversitätsmedizin Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg Universität MainzMainzGermany

Personalised recommendations