Advertisement

Spine Surgery pp 233-241 | Cite as

Pre-Hospital Management, Physical Examination & Polytrauma Management

  • Philipp SchleicherEmail author
  • Frank Kandziora
Chapter

Abstract

Severe trauma has a high probability for spinal injuries. Therefore, proper spinal immobilization is recommended. Additionally, in the multiple injured patient, the most important issue is to get a quick overview about the plentity of possible injuries - some of them do have a higher priority than spinal injuries, some of them do not. And even the spinal injuries can be categorized into different priorities. In this example case, we illustrate, how to immobilize the spine properly, how to set the indication for immobilization and how to prioritize the treatment in the multiple injured patient. This case will detail the following problems:
  1. 1.

    Pre-hospital management of spinal injuries

     
  2. 2.

    How to immobilize the spinal injured patient

     
  3. 3.

    Prioritization of treatment in multiple injured patients.

     

References

  1. 1.
    Bliemel C, Lefering R, Buecking B, Frink M, Struewer J, Krueger A, et al. Early or delayed stabilization in severely injured patients with spinal fractures? Current surgical objectivity according to the trauma registry of DGU: treatment of spine injuries in polytrauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(2):366–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eggers C, Stahlenbrecher A. Verletzungen der BWS und LWS. Unfallchirurg. 1998;101(10):779–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kwan I, Bunn F, Roberts IG. Spinal immobilisation for trauma patients. Cochrane Lib. 2001;(2):CD002803.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ahn H, Singh J, Nathens A, MacDonald RD, Travers A, Tallon J, et al. Pre-hospital care management of a potential spinal cord injured patient: a systematic review of the literature and evidence-based guidelines. J Neurotrauma. 2011;28(8):1341–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mahshidfar B, Mofidi M, Yari AR, Mehrsorosh S. Long backboard versus vacuum mattress splint to immobilize whole spine in trauma victims in the field: a randomized clinical trial. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013;28(5):462–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Báez AA, Schiebel N. Is routine spinal immobilization an effective intervention for trauma patients? Ann Emerg Med. 2006;47(1):110–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bernhard M, Gries A, Kremer P, Böttiger BW. Spinal cord injury (SCI)—prehospital management. Resuscitation. 2005;66(2):127–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lendemans S, Ruchholtz S. S3-Leitlinie Polytrauma/Schwerverletzten-Behandlung. Unfallchirurg. 2012;115(1):14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fehlings MG, Vaccaro A, Wilson JR, Singh A, Cadotte DW, Harrop JS, et al. Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: results of the surgical timing in acute spinal cord injury study (STASCIS). PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Henderson RL, Reid DC, Saboe LA. Multiple noncontiguous spine fractures. Spine. 1991;16(2):128–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Briggs AM, Van Dieën JH, Wrigley TV, Greig AM, Phillips B, Lo SK, Bennell KL. Thoracic kyphosis affects spinal loads and trunk muscle force. Phys Ther. 2007;87(5):595–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Zentrum für Wirbelsäulenchirurgie und Neurotraumatologie, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt am MainFrankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations