International Dynamics in Lobbying Regulation

  • Michele CrepazEmail author
  • Raj Chari
  • John Hogan
  • Gary Murphy


Regulating lobbying is a rather recent concept in the majority of EU member states. Currently, only seven member states (France, Ireland, Lithuania, Austria, Poland, Slovenia and the UK) have legislation on lobbying activities, as well as a mandatory register of lobbyists. The most recent law has been adopted in France on 8 November 2016. Lobbying regulations are a form of transparency law that lets citizens know who is lobbying whom about what. This chapter offers a discussion of recent international dynamics in lobbying regulations. With a focus on the EU regulation, we present a comparative analysis of the robustness of lobbying laws in 16 jurisdictions found throughout the world, offering key insights into the recent trends of strengthening lobbying rules globally.


  1. ALTER-EU. (2013). ALTER-EU Briefing on the review process of the Transparency Register. Accessed May 22, 2017, from
  2. Bache, I., Bulmer, S., George, S., & Parker, O. (2015). Politics in the European Union (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Beyers, J., Eising, R., & Maloney, W. (2008). Researching interest group politics. In Europe and elsewhere: Much we study, little we know? West European Politics, 31(6), 1103–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Center for Public Integrity (CPI). (2003). Accountability: Methodology. Accessed May 31, 2017, from
  5. Chalmers, A. W. (2013). Trading information for access: Informational lobbying strategies and interest group access to the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(1), 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chari, R., Murphy, G., & Hogan, J. (2007). Regulating lobbyists: A comparative analysis of the United States, Canada, Germany and the European Union. The Political Quarterly, 78(3), 422–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chari, R., Hogan, J., & Murphy, G. (2010). Regulating lobbying: A global comparison. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chari, R., & O’Donovan, D. H. (2011). Lobbying the European Commission: Open or secret? Socialism and Democracy, 25(2), 104–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coen, D. (2007). Empirical and theoretical studies. In EU lobbying. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(3), 333–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Commission. (2011). Inter-institutional agreement on the transparency register. Agreement between the European Parliament and the European Commission on the establishment of a transparency register for organisations and self-employed individuals engaged in EU policy-making and policy implementation. Accessed May 31, 2017, from
  11. Commission. (2014a). Inter-institutional Agreement on the Transparency Register. European Parliament decision of 15 April 2014 on the modification of the inter-institutional agreement on the Transparency Register (2014/2010(ACI)). Accessed May 31, 2017, from
  12. Commission. (2014b). Opening the windows: Commission commits to enhanced transparency. Press release, Brussels, 25 November 2014. Accessed January 01, 2017, from
  13. Commission. (2015). Commission and Parliament implement new rules on Transparency Register. Press release, Brussels, 27 January 2015. Accessed January 01, 2017, from
  14. Commission. (2016). Inter-institutional Agreement, proposal on a mandatory Transparency Register. Brussels, 28.9.2016 COM(2016) 627 final. Accessed May 31, 2017, from
  15. Crepaz, M. (2016). Investigating the robustness of lobbying laws: Evidence from the Austrian case. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 5(1), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crepaz, M., & Chari, R. (2014). The EU’s initiatives to regulate lobbyists: Good or bad administration? Cuadernos Europeos the Deusto, 51(1), 71–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crepaz, M., & Chari, R. (2017). Assessing the validity and reliability of measurements when evaluating public policy. Journal of Public Policy, 1–30.
  18. European Parliament (EP). (2008). Report on the development of the framework for the activities of interest representatives (lobbyists) in the European institutions. Brussels, 2.4.2008 (2007/2115(INI)). Accessed May 22, 2017, from
  19. Greenwood, J. (2011). Interest representation in the European Union. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greenwood, J., & Dreger, J. (2013). The transparency register: A European Vanguard of strong lobby regulation? Interest Groups & Advocacy, 2(2), 139–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hix, S., & Høyland, B. (2011). The political system of the European Union. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holman, C., & Susman, T. (2009). Self-regulation and regulation of the lobbying profession. Paris: OECD Global Forum on Public Governance.Google Scholar
  23. Holman, C., & Luneburg, W. (2012). Lobbying and transparency: A comparative analysis of regulatory reform. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 1(1), 75–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jarman, H. (2011). Collaboration and consultation: Functional representation in EU stakeholder dialogues. Journal of European Integration, 33(4), 385–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Joint Transparency Register Secretariat (JTRS). (2015). Annual report on the operations of the Transparency Register. Presented by the Secretaries-General of the European Parliament and the European Commission to Ms Sylvie Guillaume, Vice-President of the European Parliament and Mr Frans Timmermans, First Vice-President of the European Commission. Accessed May 31, 2017, from
  26. Jordan, G., & Maloney, W. (2007). Democracy and interest groups: Enhancing participation? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kallas, S. (2005). Transparency restores confidence in Europe. Speech of Vice President of the European Commission, Siim Kallas, to the European Policy Institutes Network, at the Centre of European Policy Studies. Brussels, October 20, 2005. Accessed May 31, 2017, from
  28. Kallas, S. (2007). Letter to Siim Kallas from the Committee on Constitutional Affairs. September 12, 2007. Accessed May 22, 2017, from Last accessed July 19, 2016.
  29. Kanol, D. (2012). Should the European Commission enact a mandatory lobby register? Journal of Contemporary European Research, 8(4), 520–529.Google Scholar
  30. Kollmannová, D. K., & Matušková, A. (2014). Public affairs in the Czech Republic: An exploratory study of the current situation. Journal of Public Affairs, 14(1), 54–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McGrath, C. (2005). Lobbying in Washington, London, and Brussels: The persuasive communication of political issues, 26. New York: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
  32. McGrath, C. (2008). The development and regulation of lobbying in the New Member States of the European Union. Journal of Public Affairs, 8(1–2), 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Michel, H. (2013). EU lobbying and the European transparency initiative: A sociological approach to interest groups. In D. Gaxie, N. Hubé, D. Bigo, P. Blanchard, D. Della Porta, T. Erkkilä, O. Filleule, T. Kuhn, M. R. Madsen, H. Michel, & L. Parks (Eds.), A political sociology of transnational Europe (pp. 53–78). Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  34. National Assembly of the Republic of Slovenia. (2010). Integrity and prevention of corruption act. Accessed May 31, 2017, from
  35. Newmark, A. (2005). Measuring state legislative lobbying regulation, 1990–2003. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 5(2), 182–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Opheim, C. (1991). Explaining the differences. In state lobby regulation. Political Research Quarterly, 44(2), 405–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rush, M. (1998). The Canadian experience: The lobbyists registration act. Parliamentary Affairs, 51(4), 516–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sanchez Salgado, R. (2014). Rebalancing EU interest representation? Associative democracy and EU funding of civil society organizations. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(2), 337–353.Google Scholar
  39. Thomas, C. (1998). Interest group regulation across the United States: Rationale, development and consequences. Parliamentary Affairs, 51(4), 500–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Veksler, A. (2012). Opaque transparency: An analysis of the Israeli lobbying regulatory regime of 2008. Journal of Public Affairs, 12(4), 270–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Veksler, A. (2015). Diluted regulations—A need to review the theoretical classification of the different lobbying regulatory environments. Journal of Public Affairs, 15(1), 56–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michele Crepaz
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Raj Chari
    • 1
  • John Hogan
    • 3
  • Gary Murphy
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceTrinity College DublinDublinIreland
  2. 2.College of Business, DITDublinIreland
  3. 3.Center for Business, Society & Sustainability, DITDublinIreland
  4. 4.Dublin City UniversityDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations