Advertisement

The Representation of SME Interests in the TTIP Negotiations: A German Case Study

  • Matthias GötzEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Götz discusses lobbying by small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) on the TTIP negotiations, using the lobbying positions of German SME business associations as a case study. His analysis shows that support for or opposition to TTIP by SME associations rather reflects a response of associations to publicly debated non-trade issues than divergent economic interests of firms in the respective associations. The discussion explores the implications of the positioning by associations along political interests for the representation of economic interests of exporting SMEs in TTIP. The opposition by some SME associations has likely increased the pressure on the European Commission to adjust TTIP to needs of SMEs but simultaneously undermined its ability to pursue issues that would have delivered the biggest economic benefits to SMEs.

Notes

Acknowledgment

The author would like to thank Professor Wolfgang Wessels for his encouragement to research the role of SMEs in EU trade policy. He would also like to thank Claudia Hefftler and Alexander Hoppe for helpful comments on earlier versions of this contribution.

References

  1. Beyers, J., & Kerremans, B. (2012). Domestic embeddedness and the dynamics of multilevel venue shopping in four EU Member States. Governance, 25(2), 263–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bode, T. (2015). Die Freihandelslüge: Warum TTIP nur den Konzernen nützt – und uns allen schadet (1st ed.). Munich: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt.Google Scholar
  3. Bouwen, P. (2002). Corporate lobbying in the European Union: The logic of access. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(3), 365–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bundesverband mittelständische Wirtschaft. (2014). Ohoven: Erklärung der Wirtschaftsverbände zu TTIP übergeht Interessen des Mittelstands. Retrieved August 8, 2017, from https://www.bvmw.de/nc/homeseiten/news/artikel/ohoven-erklaerung-der-wirtschaftsverbaende-zu-ttip-uebergeht-interessen-des-mittelstands-1.html
  5. Bundesverband mittelständische Wirtschaft. (2015). Ohoven: TTIP muss mittelstandstauglich werden. Retrieved August 8, 2017, from https://www.bvmw.de/nc/homeseiten/news/artikel/ohoven-ttip-muss-mittelstandstauglich-werden-1.html
  6. Bundesverband mittelständische Wirtschaft. (2016). Ohoven: TTIP-Verhandlungen einfrieren, bis Geheimniskrämerei beendet ist. Retrieved August 8, 2017, from https://www.bvmw.de/nc/homeseiten/news/artikel/ohoven-ttip-verhandlungen-einfrieren-bis-geheimniskraemerei-beendet-ist.html
  7. Coen, D. (1997). The evolution of the large firm as a political actor in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(1), 91–108.  https://doi.org/10.1080/135017697344253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deutscher Industrie- und Handelskammertag. (2014a). Going International 2013/2014: Erfahrungen und Perspektiven der deutschen Wirtschaft im Auslandsgeschäft. Retrieved August 8, 2017, from https://www.ihk-nuernberg.de/de/media/PDF/International/studie-going-international-2013-2014.pdf
  9. Deutscher Industrie- und Handelskammertag. (2014b). Vorstandsbeschluss TTIP, Berlin, Deutscher Industrie- und Handelskammertag. Retrieved August 8, 2017, from http://www.dihk.de/themenfelder/international/aussenwirtschaftspolitik-recht/handelspolitik/ttip
  10. Eising, R. (2009). The political economy of state-business relations in Europe: Interest mediation, capitalism and EU policy making (1st ed.). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eurochambres. (2013). Eurochambres’ views and priorities for the negotiations with the United States for a Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). Retrieved August 8, 2017, from http://www.eurochambres.eu/DocShare/docs/1/GAOAGDODAFMMOOFFDNINPLKEUE49VD4C5TX7KH6OQHU7/EUROCHAMBRES/docs/DLS/Updated_ECH.Postion.Paper.TTIP-2013-00863-01.pdf
  12. European Commission. (2015a). Report: Small and medium sized enterprises and the transatlantic trade and investment partnership, Brussels. Retrieved August 9, 2017, from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/april/tradoc_153348.pdf
  13. European Commission. (2015b). Textual proposal: Small and medium-sized enterprises. Retrieved August 9, 2017, from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/january/tradoc_153028.pdf
  14. European Commission. (2016). User guide to the SME definition. Retrieved August 9, 2017, from ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/15582/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/pdf
  15. Familienunternehmer. (2014). TTIP: A family business appeal for free trade. Retrieved August 9, 2017, from https://www.familienunternehmer.eu/fileadmin/familienunternehmer/positionen/europa/dateien/TTIP_english_familienunternehmen.pdf
  16. Fischer, D. (2012). Strategiefähigkeit und Kampagnenführung von Unternehmerverbänden: Interessenvertretung am Beispiel des Verbandes Die Familienunternehmer – ASU. Wiesbaden: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fliess, B., & Busquets, C. (2006). The role of trade barriers in SME internationalisation. OECD Trade Policy Working Paper No. 45. Retrieved August 9, 2017, from http://www.oecd.org/trade/ntm/37872326.pdf
  18. Klüver, H. (2013). Lobbying in the European Union: Interest groups, lobbying coalitions, and policy change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. KMU gegen TTIP. (2016a). TTIP in der Diskussion: Handwerk. Retrieved August 9, 2017, from http://unternehmenhandeln.de/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/160608_Faktenblatt_TTIP_in_der_Diskussion_Handwerk.pdf
  20. KMU gegen TTIP. (2016b). TTIP in der Diskussion: Maschinenbau und Elektronikindustrie. Retrieved August 9, 2017, from http://unternehmenhandeln.de/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/160204_Pressemitteilung_KMU_gegen_TTIP_Factsheet-Maschinenbau.pdf
  21. Krickhahn, T. (1995). Die Verbände des wirtschaftlichen Mittelstands in Deutschland. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
  22. Prognos. (2016). Wie zufrieden ist der Mittelstand mit der aktuellen Freihandelspolitik?. Retrieved August 9, 2017, from https://www.prognos.com/uploads/tx_atwpubdb/160310_Prognos_Mitgliederbefragung_TTIP.pdf
  23. Simon, H. (2012). Hidden Champions – Aufbruch nach Globalia: Die Erfolgsstrategien unbekannter Weltmarktführer. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
  24. Traxler, F., & Huemer, G. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of business interest associations, firm size and governance: A comparative analytical approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. US Postal Service. (2014). European SME Exporting Insights: Doing business throughout Europe and beyond. Retrieved August 9, 2017, from https://pressroom.ups.com/assets/pdf/European_SME_Exporting_Insights_ENGLISH_1.pdf
  26. Woll, C. (2008). Firm interests: How governments shape business lobbying on global trade. Ithaka, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political Science and European AffairsCologne Graduate School in Management, Economics and Social Sciences, Jean Monnet Chair Professor Wessels, University of CologneKölnGermany

Personalised recommendations