Advertisement

Lobbyism in the EU Comitology System

  • Rikke Wetendorff Nørgaard
  • Peter NedergaardEmail author
  • Jens Blom-Hansen
Chapter

Abstract

Nedergaard et al. focus in their contribution on a largely understudied field of lobbyism on European level: the EU comitology system. This concept refers to the process by which the European Commission adopts implementing or administrative acts on authority delegated by Council and European Parliament and which is often done under the control of a comitology committee composed of officials from member states and chaired by the Commission. The complexity of this system makes it—compared to the more transparent ordinary legislative procedure—less obvious when and where interest representatives get active during the process. Given the lack of scholarly literature, the authors base their analysis on two case studies and provide by this approach a specific and also an interesting insight into a little-known aspect of policymaking. They identify which interests are active, which institutions and stakeholders are targets of lobbying and when and where lobbyists gain access. And finally they give an answer to the questions whether lobbying activities by business interests have altered their focus in the post-Lisbon comitology system and why this field of lobbyism would deserve more scientific research.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Philip Larsen for research assistance on this chapter, which is a revised version of Wetendorff Nørgaard, Nedergaard and Blom-Hansen (2014). The material is reused after permission by Taylor & Francis Ltd. (www.tandfonline.com).

References

  1. Bergström, C. F. (2005). Comitology. Delegation of powers in the European Union and the committee system. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blom-Hansen, J. (2011). The EU comitology system in theory and practice. Keeping an eye on the commission? Houndsmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  3. Bouwen, P. (2004). Exchanging access goods for access: A comparative study of business lobbying in the European Union institutions. European Journal of Political Research, 43, 337–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brandsma, G. J. (2013). Controlling comitology: Accountability in a multi-level system. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brandsma, G. J., & Blom-Hansen, J. (2012). Negotiating the post-Lisbon comitology system: Institutional battles over delegated decision-making. Journal of Common Market Studies, 50, 939–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brandsma, G. J., & Blom-Hansen, J. (2016). Controlling delegated powers in the post-Lisbon European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 23, 531–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Christiansen, T., Oettel, J. M., & Vaccari, B. (Eds.). (2009). 21st Century comitology. Implementing committees in the enlarged European Union (pp. 175–203). Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration.Google Scholar
  8. Coen, D. (2007). Empirical and theoretical studies in EU lobbying. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(3), 333–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Commission. (2009a). Commission Regulation No 272/2009 of 2 April 2009 supplementing the common basic standards on civil aviation security laid down in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council.Google Scholar
  10. Commission. (2009c). Stakeholder meeting of the European Climate Change Program (ECCP) Working group on emissions trading on benchmarks, Brussels, 6 November 2009. Accessed May 26, 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/documentation/ets/benchmarking_en.htm
  11. Commission. (2009d). Communication from the commission to the European parliament and the council – Implementation of article 290 of the treaty on the functioning of the European Union. Bruxelles, 9. December 2009, COM(2009)673.Google Scholar
  12. Commission. (2010a). Report from the Commission on the working of committees during 2009, COM(2010)354 final.Google Scholar
  13. Commission. (2011). Commission decision of 27 April 2011 determining transitional Union-wide rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances pursuant to Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.Google Scholar
  14. Council of Ministers. (2006). Council decision of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission. Decision as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC, OJ L 200, 22 July 2006. Consolidated version, OJ C 255/4, 21 October 2006.Google Scholar
  15. European Parliament and Council. (2003). Directive 2003/87/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the community and amending council directive 96/61/EC (Text with EEA relevance).Google Scholar
  16. European Parliament and Council. (2011). Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European parliament and of the council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers. OJ L55, 28.2.2011, 13–18.Google Scholar
  17. European Parliament, Council and Commission. (2016). Interinstitutional agreement between the European Parliament, the council of the European Union and the European commission on better law-making. OJ L123, 12.05.2016, 1–14.Google Scholar
  18. George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Greenwood, J. (2007). Interest representation in the European Union (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Héritier, A., Moury, C., Bischoff, C., & Bergström, C. F. (2013). Changing rules of delegation: A contest for power in comitology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kohler-Koch, B. (1997). Organized interests in the EC and the European Parliament. European Integration Online Papers, EIOP, 1(9).Google Scholar
  22. Mazey, S., & Richardson, J. (2006). Interest groups and EU policy making: Organizational logic and venueshopping. In J. Richardson (Ed.), European Union. Power and policy-making (pp. 208–268). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Ministry of Climate and Energy. (2010). Grundnotat: Komiteprocedure i Klimakomitéen, København, 3 November 2010. Accessed August 9, 2017, from www.ft.dk/samling/20101/almdel/euu/bilag/71/913322.pdf
  24. Pollack, M. (2003). The engines of European integration. In Delegation, agency, and agenda setting in the EU. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rikke Wetendorff Nørgaard
    • 1
  • Peter Nedergaard
    • 2
    Email author
  • Jens Blom-Hansen
    • 3
  1. 1.Vækstfonden (Danish Growth Fund), HellerupHellerupDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen KDenmark
  3. 3.Department of Political ScienceAarhus UniversityAarhus CDenmark

Personalised recommendations