Patient Registries for Clinical Research
Patient registries are fundamental to biomedical research. Registries provide consistent data for defined populations and can be used to support the study of the determinants and manifestations of disease and provide a picture of the natural history, outcomes of treatment, and experiences of individuals with a given condition or exposure. It is anticipated that electronic health record (EHR) systems will evolve to ubiquitously capture detailed clinical data that supports observational, and ultimately interventional, research. Emerging data representation and exchange standards can enable the interoperability required for automated transmission of clinical data into patient registries. This chapter describes informatics principles and approaches relevant to the design and implementation of patient registries, with emphasis on the ingestion of clinical data and the role of patient registries in research and learning health activities.
KeywordsRegistries Clinical research Secondary data use Observational research methods Data standards Interoperability Outcomes measurement Learning health systems
- 1.AHRQ. In: Gliklich RE, Dreyer NA, editors. Registries for evaluating patient outcomes: a user’s guide. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2010.Google Scholar
- 7.Horsley K. Florence Nightingale. J Mil Veterans’ Health. 2018;18(4):2–5.Google Scholar
- 8.Military Records. Civil war records: basic research sources. 2018 [cited 2018 July 1, 2018]. Available from: https://www.archives.gov/research/military/civil-war/resources.
- 9.Patient registries. In: DN, Gliklich RE, Leavy MB, editors. Registries for evaluating patient outcomes: a user’s guide [Internet]. 3rd ed. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2014.Google Scholar
- 10.CMS. Centralized repository/RoPR. 2018a. [cited 2018 June 23]. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EH RIncentivePrograms/CentralizedRepository-.html.
- 11.FDA. Guidance for industry and FDA staff. Procedures for handling post-approval studies imposed by PMA order. Rockville: U.S. Food and Drug Administration; 2007.Google Scholar
- 13.Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI). CTTI recommendations: registry trials. 2017. [cited 2018 June 23]. Available from: https://www.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/files/recommendations/registrytrials-recs.pdf.
- 15.CMS. Quality measures requirements. 2018b [cited 2018 June 23]. Available from: https://qpp.cms.gov/mips/quality-measures.
- 16.Platt R, et al. Clinician engagement for continuous learning discussion paper. Washington, DC: National Academy of Medicine; 2017.Google Scholar
- 17.AHRQ. Bringing the patient voice to evidence generation: patient engagement in disease registries. (AHRQ Views. Blog posts from AHRQ leaders). 2018. [cited 2018 June 23]. Available from: http://www.ahrq.gov/news/blog/ahrqviews/disease-registries.html.
- 18.IOM. The learning healthcare system: workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2007.Google Scholar
- 19.ONC. Introduction to the interoperability standards advisory. 2018a. [cited 2018 June 23]. Available from: https://www.healthit.gov/isa/.
- 20.Chute CG. Medical concept representation. In: Chen H, et al., editors. Medical informatics. Knowledge management and data mining in biomedicine. New York: Springer; 2005. p. 163–82.Google Scholar
- 21.ONC. 2015 edition certification companion guide. 2015 edition common clinical data set – 45 CFR 170.102. 2018b. [cited 2018 June 23]. Available from: https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/2015Ed_CCG_CCDS.pdf.
- 22.NLM. The NIH common data element (CDE) resource portal. 2013. [cited 2013 March 6]. Available from: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/cde/.
- 23.CMS. Data element library. 2018. [cited 2018 June 23]. Available from: https://del.cms.gov/DELWeb/pubHome.
- 24.Sood HS, et al. Has the time come for a unique patient identifier for the U.S.? NEJM Catalyst. 2018.Google Scholar
- 25.Dusetzina SB, Tyree S, Meyer AM, et al. Linking data for health services research: a framework and instructional guide [Internet]. In:An overview of record linkage methods. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2014.Google Scholar
- 26.21st Century Cures Act. 2018. [cited 2018 July 1]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/RegulatoryInformation/LawsEnforcedbyFDA/SignificantAmendmentstotheFDCAct/21stCenturyCuresAct/default.htm.
- 29.PheKB. 2012. [cited 2013 May 24]. Vanderbilt University. Available from: http://www.phekb.org/.
- 30.NLM. NLM Value Set Authority Center (VSAC). 2015. Feb 11, 2015 [cited 2015 March 11]. Available from: https://vsac.nlm.nih.gov/.
- 31.PheMA. PheMA wiki: phenotype execution modeling architecture project. 2015. [cited 2015 September 28]. Available from: http://informatics.mayo.edu/phema/index.php/Main_Page.
- 33.Richesson RL, Smerek MM, Blake Cameron C. A framework to support the sharing and reuse of computable phenotype definitions across health care delivery and clinical research applications. EGEMS (Washington, DC). 2016;4(3):1232.Google Scholar
- 34.Gliklich RE, et al. Registry of patient registries outcome measures framework: information model report. Methods research report, Prepared by L&M Policy Research, LLC, under Contract No. 290-2014-00004-C. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2018.Google Scholar
- 37.Rothman K, Greenland S. Modern epidemiology. 2nd ed. Hagerstown: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 1998.Google Scholar
- 38.AHRQ. In: Gliklich RE, Dreyer NA, editors. Registries for evaluating patient outcomes: a user’s guide. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2007.Google Scholar
- 40.Wickham H. Tidy data. 2014., 2014;59(10):23.Google Scholar
- 41.Blumenthal S. The use of clinical registries in the United States: a landscape survey. eGEMs (Generating evidence & methods to improve patient outcomes). 2017;5(1):26.Google Scholar
- 42.Chute CG, Huff SM. The pluripotent rendering of clinical data for precision medicine. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;245:337–40. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29295111.
- 43.ONC. Common clinical data set. 2015. [cited 2018 June 25]. Available from: https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/commonclinicaldataset_ml_11-4-15.pdf.
- 44.S4S. Sync for science (S4S). Helping patients share EHR data with researchers. 2018. [cited 2018 June 25]. Available from: http://syncfor.science/.