Advertisement

Introduction to Clinical Research Informatics

  • Rachel L. RichessonEmail author
  • James E. Andrews
  • Kate Fultz Hollis
Chapter
Part of the Health Informatics book series (HI)

Abstract

This chapter provides essential definitions and overviews important constructs and methods within the subdomain of clinical research informatics. The chapter also highlights theoretical and practical contributions from other disciplines. This chapter sets the tone and scope for the text, highlights important themes, and describes the content and organization of chapters.

Keywords

Clinical research informatics definition CRI Theorem of informatics American Medical Informatics Association Biomedical informatics 

References

  1. 1.
    Mayer D. A brief history of medicine and statistics. In:Essential evidence-based medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004. p. 1–8.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atkins HJ. The three pillars of clinical research. Br Med J. 1958;2(5112):1547–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bacchieri A, Della Cioppa G. Fundamentals of clinical research: bridging medicine, statistics and operations, Statistics for biology and health. Milan: Springer; 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Friedman CP. A “fundamental theorem” of biomedical informatics. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16(2):169–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    NIH. The NIH Director’s panel on clinical research report to the advisory committee to the NIH director, December, 1997. 1997. [cited 2011 May 15]. Available from: http://www.oenb.at/de/img/executive_summary%2D%2Dnih_directors_panel_on_clinical_research_report_12_97_tcm14-48582.pdf.
  6. 6.
    Embi PJ, Payne PR. Clinical research informatics: challenges, opportunities and definition for an emerging domain. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16(3):316–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sanchez-Pinto L, Mosa ASM, Fultz-Hollis K, Tachinardi U, Barnett WK, Embi PJ. The emerging role of the chief research informatics officer in academic health centers. Appl Clin Inform. 2017;8(3):845–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Forrest WH, Bellville JW. The use of computers in clinical trials. Br J Anaesth. 1967;39:311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pryor DB, et al. Features of TMR for a successful clinical and research database. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. Blum BI (ed). New York: IEEE, 1982.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blois MS. Medical records and clinical databases: what is the difference? MD Comput. 1984;1(3):24–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Breitfeld PP, et al. Pilot study of a point-of-use decision support tool for cancer clinical trials eligibility. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999;6(6):466–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Carlson R, et al. Computer-based screening of patients with HIV/AIDS for clinical-trial eligibility. Online J Curr Clin Trials. 1995.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mansour EG. Barriers to clinical trials. Part III: knowledge and attitudes of health care providers. Cancer. 1994;74(9 Suppl):2672–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    ICH. Guideline for good clinical practice E6(R1). International Conference on Harmonisation. 1996.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shortliffe EH, CImino JJ, Hannah KJ, editors. Biomedical informatics: computer applications in health care and biomedicine health informatics. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC; 2006.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hoyt R, Hersh WR, editors. Health informatics: practical guide. 7th ed. North Carolina: Morrisville, Lulu.com, 2018. 486 p.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Embi P. AMIA CRI years in review. 2018 [cited 2018 July 1]. Available from: http://www.embi.net/cri-years-in-review.html.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rachel L. Richesson
    • 1
    Email author
  • James E. Andrews
    • 2
  • Kate Fultz Hollis
    • 3
  1. 1.Duke University School of NursingDurhamUSA
  2. 2.School of Information, College of Arts and SciencesUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA
  3. 3.Oregon Health & Science UniversityPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations