Advertisement

Religion, Trust in Institutions and Attitudes Towards Abortion: A Comparison of Lutheran and Orthodox Countries

  • Olga BreskayaEmail author
  • Pål Ketil Botvar
  • Anders Sjöborg
  • Silviu Rogobete
Chapter
Part of the Religion and Human Rights book series (REHU, volume 4)

Abstract

This article compares students’ attitudes towards human rights in countries with different religious traditions, namely Lutheran-dominated Scandinavian countries and Christian Orthodox countries in the eastern part of Europe. The four countries involved in this study are Belarus, Romania, Norway and Sweden, and our focus is on students’ attitudes towards human rights—especially reproductive health and women’s rights. The effect religion has on attitudes to such rights is a central part of our analysis. In addition, the article will examine the relationship between trust in institutions and support for human rights. Previous studies report that trust in institutions correlates positively with values that stress stability, protection, and preservation of traditional practices, correlating negatively with values that emphasise independent thought and change. On this basis we expect that trust in governmental institutions will have different effects in countries with democratic and authoritarian regimes.

Keywords

Human rights Abortion Women’s rights Religiosity Trust Authoritarianism Democracy Belarus Romania Norway Sweden 

References

  1. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  2. Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality”. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47–92). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  3. Anckar, C. (2008). On the applicability of the most similar systems design and the most different systems design in comparative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11, 389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Casanova, J. (1994). Public religions in the modern world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Casanova, J. (2003). What is a public religion? In H. Heclo & W. M. McClay (Eds.), Religion returns to the public square (pp. 111–141). Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar
  6. Casanova, J. (2009, winter). The Secular and Secularisms. Social Research, 76(4), 1049–1066.Google Scholar
  7. Dalton, R. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices: The Erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Democracy Index. (2015). The economist intelligence unit 2016. Democracy Index 2015.Google Scholar
  9. Devos, T., Spini, D., & Schwartz, S. (2002). Conflicts among human values and trust in institutions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 481–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huber, S., & Huber, O. W. (2012). The centrality of religiosity scale (CRS). Religions, 3, 710–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Morselli, S., Morselli, D., Spini, D., & Devos, T. (2012). Hu values and trust in institutions across countries: A multilevel test of Schwartz’s hypothesis of structural equivalence. Survey Research Methods, 6(1), 49–60.Google Scholar
  12. Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004). Sacred and secular. Religion and politics worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pettersson, T. (2006). Religion in contemporary society: Eroded by human well-being, supported by cultural diversity. Comparative Sociology, 5(6), 231–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of the American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  15. Putnam, R. D., & Campbell, D. E. (2010). American grace. How religion divides and unites us. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  16. Staerklé, C., Clémence, A., & Doise, W. (1998). Representation of human rights across different national contexts: the role of democratic and non-democratic populations and governments. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 207–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. The Basis of the Social Concept of the Russian Orthodox Church. (2000). Internet access: https://mospat.ru/en/documents/social-concepts/xii/. Accessed on March 21, 2017.
  18. Wollebæk, D. (2013). Religion og sosial kapital. Hva kan spørreundersøkelser fortelle oss? (Religion and Social Capital: What do International Surveys Tell Us?) Senter for forskning på sivilsamfunn og frivillige organisasjoner, 4/13.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olga Breskaya
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pål Ketil Botvar
    • 2
  • Anders Sjöborg
    • 3
  • Silviu Rogobete
    • 4
  1. 1.University of PadovaPadovaItaly
  2. 2.KIFO Institute for Church, Religion, and Worldview ResearchOsloNorway
  3. 3.Uppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  4. 4.West University of TimisoaraTimișoaraRomania

Personalised recommendations