Advertisement

Policy Formation: The Imbalance of Power Within the Core Executive

  • Leanne McCarthy-Cotter
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the role of power within of the core executive and its impact on the formation of the 1991 Child Support Act. It stresses that in the drafting of the 1991 Child Support Bill there were two strands of thought and that these conflicting perspectives reflected the objectives pursued by different Government Departments and Ministers. It assesses the imbalance of power, looking at how divergent agendas gained position within the single policy. It evaluates the power resources (that of direct, indirect, and misdirected power) that Thatcher and the Treasury utilised to successfully push through their Treasury-driven agenda. The chapter also discusses the power relations and ‘battles’ that occurred within the core executive, showing why Newton introduced a policy despite not entirely agreeing with the details. This chapter states that while the policy proposal of Newton and Lord Mackay was maintained, the detail inside the Bill was controversial, ill-judged, and contradictory to the original aims, due to the involvement of Thatcher and the Treasury. The chapter ends by advancing upon Kingdon’s idea of ‘policy windows’ (1984), demonstrating that Thatcher and the Treasury were aware that their approach would be unlikely to obtain support and lead to the desired policy change, and so they concealed their ‘problem stream’ and ‘policy stream’ within that of Newton and Mackays’.

Keywords

Core executive Treasury Prime Minister Thatcher Ministers Power Policy windows Policy streams Cabinet 

References

  1. Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. (1962). Two Faces of Power. The American Political Science Review, 56(4), 947–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennister, M. (2007). Tony Blair and John Howard: Comparative Predominance and Institution Stretch in the UK and Australia. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 9, 327–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennister, M. (2012). Prime Ministers in Power: Blair and Howard Compared. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennister, M., & Heffernan, R. (2011). Cameron as Prime Minister: The Intra Executive Politics of Britain’s Coalition Government. Parliamentary Affairs, 65(4), 778–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennister, M., & Heffernan, R. (2014, July). The Limits to Prime Ministerial Autonomy: Cameron and the Constraints of Coalition. Parliamentary Affairs, 68(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burch, M. (1988). British Cabinet: A Residual Executive. Parliamentary Affairs, 41, 34–47.Google Scholar
  7. Burch, M., & Halliday, I. (1996). The British Cabinet System. Englewood and Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall and Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  8. Burch, M., & Halliday, I. (2004). The Blair Government and the Core Executive. Government and Opposition, 39(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Butler, D. (1988). Margret Thatcher as a Political Leader. In R. Skidelsky (Ed.), Thatcherism. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
  10. Crenson, M. (1971). The Un-Politics of Air Pollution: A Study of Non-Decision Making in the Cities. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  11. Crewe, I., & King, A. (2013). The Blunders of Our Government. London: One World Book.Google Scholar
  12. Crossman, R. (1972). Inside View. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  13. Dahl, R. (1957). The Concept of Power. Behavioural Science, 2(3), 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davis, G., Wikeley, N., & Young, R. (1998). Child Support in Action. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
  15. Deakin, N. (1994). The Politics of Welfare: Continuities and Change. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  16. Deakin, N., & Parry, R. (1999). The Treasury and Social Policy: The Conquest for Control of Welfare Strategy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Diamond, P. (2014). Governing Britain: Power, Politics and the Prime Minister. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  18. Dorey, P. (2000). Public Policy—The Child Support Agency. In S. Lancaster (Ed.), Developments in Politics 11 (pp. 153–175). Ormskirk: Causeway Press.Google Scholar
  19. Dunleavy, P. (1995). Policy Disasters: Explaining the UK’s Record. Public Policy and Administration, 10, 52–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dunleavy, P., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (1990). Beyond Whitehall. In H. M. Drucker, et al. (Eds.), Developments in British Politics. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Evans Woolfe Production. (12th, 19th and 26th September 1999). In Association with Brook Lapping for Channel Four, Can’t Pay Won’t Pay. London: Evans Woolfe.Google Scholar
  22. Field, F. (2011, July 26). Personal Communication with Author, Interviewed by Author.Google Scholar
  23. Foley, M. (2000). The British Presidency. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Garnham, A., & Knights, E. (1994). Putting the Treasury First: The Truth About Child Support. London: Child Poverty Action Group.Google Scholar
  25. Gilmour, I. (1992). Dancing with Dogma: Britain under Thatcherism. London: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  26. Greenaway, J. (1991). All Change at the Top? The prime Minister and Cabinet. Social Studies Review, 6(4), 136–140.Google Scholar
  27. Headey, B. (1974). British Cabinet Ministers. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  28. Heclo, H., & Wildavsky, A. (1981 [1974]). The Private Government of Public Money (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heffernan, R. (2003). Prime Ministerial Predominance? Core Executive Politics in the UK. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 5(3), 347–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heffernan, R. (2005). Exploring (and Explaining) the British Prime Minister. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7(4), 605–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Heffernan, R. (2013). There Is No Need for -isation: The Prime Minister Is Merely Prime Ministerial. Parliamentary Affairs, 66, 634–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hennessy, P. (1986). The Great and the Good: An Inquiry into the British Establishment. London: Policy Studies Institute.Google Scholar
  33. Hill, M. (2013). The Public Policy Process (6th ed.). Edinburgh: Longman.Google Scholar
  34. James, S. (1992). British Cabinet Government. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. James, S. (1995). Relations Between Prime Minister and Cabinet: From Wilson to Cabinet. In Rhodes and Dunleavy (Eds.) Prime Minister, Cabinet and Core Executive.Google Scholar
  36. Jessop, B. (1990). State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in Its Place. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  37. Kaufman, G. (1997). How to Be a Minister. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  38. Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  39. Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  40. Lawson, N. (1992). The View from No. 11: Memoirs of a Tory Radical. London: Bantam.Google Scholar
  41. Lasswell, H. (1936). Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York: Meridian Books.Google Scholar
  42. Lilley, P. (2011, July 12). Secretary of State, Department of Social Security (8 April 1992–2 May 1997). The Child Support Agency. [Interview] Houses of Parliament with L.M. Cotter.Google Scholar
  43. Lister, R. (2012, April 3). A Beacon of Compassion in a Harsh Government. Ruth Lister and Others on Former Tory minister Tony Newton. The Guardian.Google Scholar
  44. Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A Radical Review. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mackintosh, J. P. (1977). British Cabinet. London: Methuen Young Books.Google Scholar
  46. Marsh, D., Richards, D., & Smith, M. (1995). Central Government Departments and the Policy Process. In R. A. W. Rhodes and P. Dunleavy (Eds.), Prime Minister, Cabinet and Core Executive. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  47. Marsh, D. Richards, D., & Smith, M. (2003). Unequal Plurality: Towards an Asymmetric Power Model of British Politics. Government and Opposition. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Middlemas, K. (1991). Power, Competition and the State Volume 3: The End of the Post-War Era Britain Since 1974. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1981). Control and Power in Central-Local Government Relationships. Aldershot and Brookfield, Vermont: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  50. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1995). From Prime Ministerial Power to Core Executive. In R. A. W. Rhodes and P. Dunleavy (Eds.), Prime Minister, Cabinet and Core Executive (pp. 11–37). London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding Governance. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Rhodes, R. A. W., & Dunleavy, P. (Eds.). (1995). Introducing the Core Executive. In R. A. W. Rhodes (Ed.), Prime Minister, Cabinet and Core Executive (pp. 11–37). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  53. Schattschneider, E. (1960). The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  54. Smith, M. J. (1990). Pluralism, Reformed Pluralism and Neo-Pluralism: The Role of Pressure Groups in Policy-Making. Political Studies, 38(2), 302–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Smith, M. J. (1995a). From Policy Community to Issue Network: Salmonella in Eggs and the New Politics of Food. Public Administration, 69(2), 235–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Smith, M. (1995b). Pressure Politics. Manchester: Baseline Books.Google Scholar
  57. Smith, M. J. (1999). The Core Executive in Britain. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Smith, M. (2003). The Core Executive and the Modernization of Central Government. In P. Dunleavy, et al. (Eds.), Developments in British Politics 7 (pp. 60–81). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  59. Smith, M. J., Marsh, D., & Richards, D. (1995). Central Government Departments and the Policy Process. In R. A. W. Rhodes (Ed.), Prime Minister, Cabinet and Core Executive (pp. 11–37). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  60. Thain, C., & Wright, M. (1990). Coping with Difficulty: The Treasury and Public Expenditure 1976–1989. In Policy and Politics, 18(1), (pp. 1–16).Google Scholar
  61. Thain, C., & Wright, M. (1992). Planning and Controlling Public Expenditure in the UK Public AdministrationPart 1: The Treasury’s Public Expenditure Survey. Public Administration, 20(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thatcher, M. (1993). The Downing Street Years. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  63. Wikeley, N. (2006). Child Support Law and Policy. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
  64. Young, H. (2012). quoted in The Guardian, 26 March 2012, by Pearce, E. Lord Newton of Braintree Obituary.Google Scholar

Parliamentary and Government Publications and Records

  1. Social Services Committee. (1988). Ninth Report, Social Security: Changes Implemented in April 1988, Session 1988–89, HC 437-11, Minutes 86.Google Scholar
  2. Social Security Committee. (1991). House of Commons Session 1990/91, Third Report, Changes in Maintenance Arrangements, June 1991, HC 227-11.Google Scholar
  3. Wicks, M. (1991, April 30). Evidence Given to Social Security Committee, Para. 12, Second Report, Changes in Maintenance Arrangements, Social Security Committee, Session 1990–91.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leanne McCarthy-Cotter
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SheffieldSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations