Advertisement

High Frequency Trading in the Equity Markets During US Treasury POMO

  • Cheng Gao
  • Bruce Mizrach
Chapter
Part of the Dynamic Modeling and Econometrics in Economics and Finance book series (DMEF, volume 24)

Abstract

We analyze high frequency trading (HFT) activity in equities during US Treasury permanent open market (POMO) purchases by the Federal Reserve. We construct a model to study HFT quote and trade behavior when private information is released and confirm it empirically. We estimate that HFT firms reduce their inside quote participation by up to 8% during POMO auctions. HFT firms trade more aggressively, and they supply less passive liquidity to non-HFT firms. Market impact also rises during Treasury POMO. Aggressive HFT trading becomes more consistently profitable, and HFT firms earn a higher return per share. We also estimate that HFT firms earn profits of over $105 million during US Treasury POMO events.

JEL Classification

G12 G21 G24 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Nasdaq OMX for providing the high frequency dataset, an anonymous referee, Michael Fleming and seminar participants at National Chiao Tung, Nankai, the Modeling High Frequency Data in Finance Conference, and the Second International Symposium in Computational Economics and Finance.

References

  1. Abou, A., & Prat, G. (2000). Modelling stock price expectations: Lessons from microdata. In F. Gardes, & G.Prat (Eds.) Price expectations in goods and financial markets (pp. 313–46). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  2. Admati, A., & Pfleiderer, P. (1988). A theory of intraday patterns: Volume and price variability. Review of Financial Studies, 1, 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baron, M., Brogaard, J., Hagstromer, B., & Kirilenko, A. (2017). Risk and return in high frequency trading. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, forthcoming. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2433118
  4. Benos, E., & Wetherilt, A. (2012). The role of designated market makers in the new trading landscape. Bank of England Quarterly Review Q2, 52, 343–353.Google Scholar
  5. Brogaard, J., Hendershott, T., & Riordan, R. (2014). High frequency trading and price discovery. Review of Financial Studies, 27, 2267–2306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carrion, A. (2013). Very fast money: High-frequency trading on the NASDAQ. Journal of Financial Markets, 16, 680–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cvitanic, J., & Kirilenko, A. (2010). High frequency traders and asset prices. California Institute of Technology working paper. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1569067
  8. D’Amico, S., & King, T. B. (2013). Flow and stock effects of large-scale treasury purchases: Evidence on the importance of local supply. Journal of Financial Economics, 108, 425–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gagnon, J., Raskin, M., Remache, J., & Sack, B. (2011). The financial market effects of the Federal Reserve’s large-scale asset purchases. International Journal of Central Banking, 7, 3–44.Google Scholar
  10. Glosten, L. R., & Milgrom, P. R. (1985). Bid, ask, and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders. Journal of Financial Economics, 14, 71–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hagströmer, B., & Norden, L. (2013). The diversity of high-frequency traders. Journal of Financial Markets, 16, 741–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hasbrouck, J. (1991). Measuring the information content of stock trades. Journal of Finance, 46, 179–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hasbrouck, J., & Saar, G. (2013). Low-latency trading. Journal of Financial Markets, 16, 646–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hirschey, N. H. (2013). Do high-frequency traders anticipate buying and selling pressure? London Business School working paper. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2238516
  15. Jawadi, F., & Prat, G. (2012). Arbitrage costs and nonlinear stock price adjustment in the G7 countries. Applied Economics, 44, 1561–1582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Joyce, M., Lasaosa, A., Stevens, I., & Tong, M. (2011). The financial market impact of quantitative easing in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Central Banking, 7, 113–161.Google Scholar
  17. Krishnamurthy, A., & Vissing-Jorgensen, A. (2011). The effects of quantitative easing on interest rates: Channels and implications for policy. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 42(Fall), 215–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krishnamurthy, A., & Vissing-Jorgensen, A. (2012). The aggregate demand for treasury debt. Journal of Political Economy, 120, 233–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lou, D., Yan, H., & Zhang, J. (2013). Anticipated and repeated shocks in liquid markets. Review of financial studies, 26, 1891–1912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Martinez, V. H., & Roşu, I. (2013). High frequency traders, news and volatility. Working paper, HEC Paris.Google Scholar
  21. Menkveld, A. J. (2013). High frequency trading and the new-market makers. Journal of Financial Markets, 16, 712–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Neely, C. (2010). The large-scale asset purchases had large international effects. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis working paper no. 2010-018A.Google Scholar
  23. U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission and Securities and Exchange Commission. (2010). Findings regarding the market events of May 6, 2010, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  24. Zhang, F. (2010). High-frequency trading, stock volatility, and price discovery. Yale University working paper. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1691679

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cheng Gao
    • 1
  • Bruce Mizrach
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations