Advertisement

International Wine Organizations and Plurilateral Agreements: Harmonization Versus Mutual Recognition of Standards

  • Raúl Compés LópezEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter analyzes the main international wine organization—the International Organisation of Vine and Wine (OIV)—versus the main wine plurilateral agreement, the World Wine Trade Group (WWTG). Although the OIV is the oldest, biggest, and most influential organization in the world of wine, it is useful to analyze it in the face of the WWTG, as they represent a different way to design regulation and international policies. Even if both aim to facilitate trade and exchanges, one does so through harmonization and the other, the less ambitious, through the goal of mutual recognition of standards. There are no formal relations between WWTG and OIV, although many WWTG participants participate in the OIV. They don’t compete but its philosophy is very different. Through a detailed analysis, this section highlights the different philosophies and goals of action between the two.

References

  1. Anderson, K. 2003. Wine’s new world. Foreign Policy 136: 47–54.Google Scholar
  2. Banks, G., and J. Overton. 2010. Old world, new world, third world? Reconceptualising the worlds of wine. Journal of Wine Research 21 (1): 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Battaglene, T., and J. Barker. 2008. Reconciling diverse approaches to regulation in the wine sector: Harmonisation, equivalence and mutual recognition. Bulletin de l’OIV 80 (920–922): 625–637.Google Scholar
  4. Bingen, J., and L. Busch. 2006. Agricultural standards. Vol. 6. Amsterdam: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Castillo, S., R. Compés, and J.M. García. 2014. La regulaciónvitivinícola. Evolución en la UE y España y situación en el panorama internacional. In Economía del vino en España y en elmundo, coord. S. Castillo and R. Compés. CajamarCaja Rural.Google Scholar
  6. Dai, X. 2007. International institutions and national policies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dubois, S. 2013. Lecture géopolitique d’un produitalimentairemondialisé: le vin. Revue internationale et stratégique 1 (89): 18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hannin, H., J.M. Codron, and S. Thoyer. 2006. The International Office of Vine and Wine (OIV) and the World Trade Organization (WTO): Standardization issues in the wine sector. In Agricultural standards, 73–92. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Juban, Y. 1994. Harmonization, standardization carried out by the OIV in the perspective of the World Trade Organisation. Bulletin de l’OIV (France).Google Scholar
  10. Meloni, G., and J.F.M. Swinnen. 2013. The political economy of European wine regulations. Journal of Wine Economics 8 (3): 244–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Peaslee, A.J. 1974. International governmental organizations. Vol. 1. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  12. Randelli, F., and F. Dini. 2013. Oltre la globalizzazione: le proposte della Geografia economica.Google Scholar
  13. Schirmer, R. 2007. Les vins du Nouveau Monde sont-ils a-géographiques. Bulletin de l’association des géographesfrançais 1: 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Taber, G.M. 2006. Judgment of Paris. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  15. Tinlot, R. 2000. The risks of globalization and the necessary international harmonization carried out by the OIV. Bulletin de l’OIV 73 (827/828): 67–77.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and Social SciencesUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaValènciaSpain

Personalised recommendations