Advertisement

Friction-Avoiding Approaches

  • SungYong Lee
Chapter
Part of the Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies book series (RCS)

Abstract

The case study chapters of this volume examine four behavioural patterns of local peacebuilders as stated above. They examine how the four types of ownership promotion have been employed in the two areas, focusing specifically on the strategies local actors utilize to develop their unique models of peacebuilding, the distinguishing features of each of these, and their limitations as models of authentically local peacebuilding. In this chapter, a non-frictional model of promoting local ownership is explored. In both Cambodia and Mindanao, a large number of local actors choose not to overtly challenge the demands from their international donors. Instead, they attempt to push forward their agenda in the conventional structure for international-local collaboration, by redefining and operationalising the themes proposed by donors and occasionally use smoke-and-mirror strategies. This empirical finding questions whether conventional assumptions of power disparity in favour of donors is indeed valid. The theoretical significance of friction-avoiding approaches as a model of ownership promotion was discussed from two perspectives. On one hand, it offers concrete empirical examples relevant to informal and subtle forms of resistance in local communities’ ‘everyday peacebuilding’. On the other hand, it discovers the presence of a dual structure of power: while international aid donors may control the official and financial aspects of peacebuilding, it is local actors who determine the unofficial/procedural/operational mechanisms.

Keywords

Friction-avoding Contextualisation Smoke-and-mirror Biopower Dual power structure 

References

  1. Alfred, Taiaiake, and Jeff Corntassel. 2005. Being Indigenous: Resurgences Against Contemporary Colonialism. Government and Opposition 40 (4): 597–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benton, Lauren. 2001. Law and Colonial Cultures 1400–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bojicic-Dzelilovic, Vesna. 2006. Peace on Whose Terms? War Veterans’ Associations in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In Challenges to Peacebuilding: Managing Spoilers During Conflict Resolution, 200–218, ed. E. Newman and O. Richmond. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Carothers, Thomas, and Diane De Gramont. 2013. Development Aid Confronts Politics: The Almost Revolution. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
  5. Chaulia, Sreeram. 2007. International Organisations in Mindanao: To Protect or Not? The Journal of Humanitarian Assistance (February 1). Available at https://sites.tufts.edu/jha/archives/21. Accessed 15 Mar 2018.
  6. Cooperation Committee for Cambodia (CCC). 2010. Reflections, Challenges, and Choices: 2010 Review of NGO Sector in Cambodia. Phnom Penh: Cooperation Committee for Cambodia.Google Scholar
  7. De Sousa Santos, Boiaventura. 2004. Toward a New Legal Common Sense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dougherty, Beth. 2004. Right Sizing International Criminal Justice: The Hybrid Experiment at the Special Court for Sierra Leone. International Affairs 80 (2): 311–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duffield, Mark. 2002. Social Reconstruction and the Radicalization of Development: Aid as a Relation of Global Liberal Governance. Development and Change 33 (5): 1049–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Foucault, Michel. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: New York Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  11. Foucault, Michel. 1986. Of Other Spaces. Diacritics 16 (1): 22–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Galvanek, J. 2013. Translating Peacebuilding Rationalities into Practice: Local Agency and Everyday Resistance. Berlin: Berghof Foundation.Google Scholar
  13. Gaventa, John. 2003. Power After Lukes: A Review of the Literature. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
  14. Groves, Leslie, and Rachel Hinton. 2004. Inclusive Aid: Changing Power and Relationships in International Development. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  15. Hellmüller, Sara. 2014. A Story of Mutual Adaptation?: The Interaction Between Local and International Peacebuilding Actors in Ituri. Peacebuilding 2 (2): 188–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hughes, Caroline. 2003. The Political Economy of Cambodia’s Transition, 1991–2001. London and New York: Routledge Curzon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee, SungYong. 2015. Motivations for Local Resistance in International Peacebuilding. Third World Quarterly 36 (8): 1437–1452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee, SungYong, and Alpaslan Özerdem (eds.). 2015. Local Ownership in International Peacebuilding: Key Theoretical and Practical Issues. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Lister, Sarah. 2000. Power in Partnership? An Analysis of an NGO’s Relationships with its Partners. Journal of International Development 12 (2): 227–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mac Ginty, Roger. 2011. International Peacebuilding and Local Resistance: Hybrid Forms of Peace. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Newman, Edward, and Oliver Richmond (eds.). 2006. Challenges to Peacebuilding: Managing Spoilers During Conflict Resolution. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Özerdem, Alpaslan, and SungYong Lee. 2016. International Peacebuilding: An Introduction. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Rabinow, P. (ed.). 1984. The Foucault Reader. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  24. Richmond, Oliver. 2010. Resistance and the Post-liberal Peace. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 38 (3): 665–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sivhouch, Ou, and Kim Sedara. 2013. 20 Years’ Strengthening Civil Society: Time for Reflection. Phnom Penh: CDRI.Google Scholar
  26. Un, Kheang. 2006. State, Society and Democratic Consolidation: The Case of Cambodia. Pacific Affairs 79 (2): 225–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vinthagen, Stellan, and Mona Lilja. 2007. The State of Resistance Studies. A Paper Presented at the European Sociologist Association Conference, Glasgow, Scotland.Google Scholar
  28. Visoka, Gëzim. 2017. Local Resistance and the Politics of Self-Determination. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations