Advertisement

Introduction

  • SungYong Lee
Chapter
Part of the Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies book series (RCS)

Abstract

This opening chapter offers readers an introduction to the main theme: development of local peacebuilding models in Southeast Asia; as well as the key conceptual and analytical framework and the case studies. The core question of this study is “Is it ever possible for authentic local ownership to be developed under the strong influence and advocacy of external intervention?” Moreover, a few subordinate questions are: “Through what strategies do local peacebuilders develop their own models of peacebuilding? How different are they from the liberal models? What are their significance and limitations as locally-owned peacebuildings?” After introducing the questions, this chapter overviews three theoretical discussions that offer the analytical framework for the forthcoming case studies: local ownership, hybrid peace and everyday peace. Through this analysis, it will be highlighted that the development of local models of peacebuilding is understood as a gradual and positive process through which local peacebuilders can challenge external intervention. Moreover, this book will attempt to move beyond a binary conceptualisation of peacebuilding as a process characterised by an external/indigenous dichotomy and instead aims to analyse peacebuilding as a more flexible and dynamic process. Following this, it gives a concise explanation of the analytical foci of this study, highlighting the interaction of local grassroots agencies vis-à-vis external actors. The different meanings of ‘local’ will be briefly touched upon in this context and it will be clarified.

Keywords

Local ownership Hybrid peace Everyday peace 

References

  1. Abu-Lughod, Lila. 1990. The Romance of Resistance: Tracing Transformations of Power Through Bedouin Women. American Ethnologist 17 (1): 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arandel, Christian, Derick W. Brinkerhoff, and Marissa M. Bell. 2015. Reducing Fragility Through Strengthening Local Governance in Guinea. Third World Quarterly 36 (5): 985–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barash, David, and Charles Webel. 2009. Peace and Conflict Studies, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Barcham, Manuhuia. 2005. Conflict, Violence and Development in the Southwest Pacific: Taking the Indigenous Context Seriously. Working Paper 4/2005, Centre for Indigenous Governance and Development, Massey University, Palmerston North.Google Scholar
  5. Barnett, Michael, Songying Fang, and Christoph Zürcher. 2014. Compromised Peacebuilding. International Studies Quarterly 58 (1): 608–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belloni, Roberto. 2012. Hybrid Peace Governance: Its Emergence and Significance. Global Governance 18: 21–38.Google Scholar
  7. Berents, Helen, and Siobhan McEvoy-Levy. 2015. Theorising Youth and Everyday Peace(Building). Peacebuilding 3 (2): 115–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boege, Volker, M. Anne Brown, Kevin Clements, and Anna Nolan. 2008. On Hybrid Political Orders and Emerging States: State Formation in the Context of ‘Fragility’. Berlin: Berghof Research Centre for Constructive Conflict management.Google Scholar
  9. Boege, Volker, Anne Brown, Kevin Clments, and Anna Nolan. 2009a. On Hybrid Political Orders and Emerging States: What Is Failing? States in the Global South or Research and Politics in the West? In Building Peace in the Absence of States, Challenging the Discourse on State Failure, ed. Martina Fisher and Beatrix Schmelzle. Berlin: Berghof Research Centre.Google Scholar
  10. Boege, Volker, Anne Brown, Kevin Clments, and Anna Nolan. 2009b. Building Peace and Political Community in Hybrid Political Orders. International Peacekeeping 16 (5): 599–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boyden, Jo, and Gillian Mann. 2005. Children’s Risk, Resilience, and Coping in Extreme Situations. In Handbook for Working with Children and Youth: Pathways to Resilience Across Cultures and Contexts, ed. Michael Ungar, 3–25. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brāuchler, Birgit. 2015. The Cultural Dimension of Peace: Decentralization and Reconciliation in Indonesia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown, Michael. 1996. On Resisting Resistance. American Anthropologist 98 (4): 729–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Campbell, Susanna, David Chandler, Meera Sabaratnam, and Others. 2011. A Liberal Peace? The Problems and Practices of Peacebuilding. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  15. Castañeda, Carla. 2009. How Liberal Peacebuilding May Be Failing Sierra Leone. Review of African Political Economy 36 (120): 235–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chesterman, Simon. 2007. Owership in Theory and in Practice: Transfer of Authority in UN Statebuilding Operations. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 1 (1): 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clements, Kevin. 2009. Internal Dynamics and External Interventions. Peace Review 21 (1): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coronel-Ferrer, Miriam. 2005. Institutional Response: Civil Society. A Background paper submitted for the Philippine Human Development Report, The Human Development Network Foundation, Quezon City.Google Scholar
  19. Craig, David, and Doug Porter. 2006. Development Beyond Neoliberalism? New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Dibley, Thushara. 2014. Partnership, Power and Peacebuilding: NGOs as Agents of Peace in Aceh and Timor-Leste. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Donais, Timothy. 2012. Peacebuilding and Local Ownership: Post-conflict Consensus Building. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Donais, Timothy, and Geoff Burt. 2015. Peace-Building in Haiti: The Case for Vertical Integration. Conflict, Security and Development 15 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ear, Sophal. 2007. The Political Economy of Aid and Governance in Cambodia. Asian Journal of Political Science 15 (1): 68–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Felix da Costa, Diana, and John Karlsrud. 2012. Contestualising Libeal Peacebuilding for Local Circumstances: Unmiss and Local Peacebuilding In South Sudan. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 7 (2): 53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Foucault, Michel. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  26. Foucault, Michel. 1982. The Subject and Power. Critical Inquiry 8 (4): 777–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Futamura, Madoka, and Mark Notaras. 2011. Local Perspectives on International Peacebuilding. Research Article Series. Tokyo: United Nations University. Available at http://unu.edu/publications/articles/local-perspectives-on-international-peacebuilding.html#info.
  28. Gaventa, John. 2003. Power After Lukes: A Review of the Literature. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
  29. Gibson, Christopher, and Michael Woolcock. 2008. Empowerment, Deliberative Development, and Local-Level Politics in Indonesia: Participatory Projects as a Source of Countervailing Power. Studies in International Comparative Development 43 (3–4): 151–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harris, Ian. 2004. Peace Education Theory. Journal of Peace Education 1 (1): 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hasselskog, Malin, and Isabell Schierenbeck. 2015. National Policy in Local Practice: The Case of Rwanda. Third World Quarterly 36 (5): 950–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Heathershaw, John, and Daniel Lambach. 2008. Introduction: Post-conflict Spaces and Approaches to Statebuilding. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 2 (3): 269–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Helgesson, Stefan. 1999. Sports of Culture: Writing the Resistant Subject in South Africa. Uppsala: Litteraturvetenska-pilga Institution.Google Scholar
  34. Hellmüller, Sara. 2017. The Interaction Between Local and International Peacebuilding Actors: Partenrs for Peace. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  35. Henriques, Miguel Barreto. 2011. Peacebuilding from Below in Colombia: The Case Study of the Peace Laboratories. In Conflict Society and Peacebuilding: Comparative Perspectives, ed. Raffaele Machetti and Natalie Tocci, 173. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Henrizi, Annika. 2015. Building Peace in Hybrid Spaces: Women’s Agency in Iraqi NGOs. Peacebuilding 3 (1): 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hoehne, Markus. 2006. Political Identity, Emerging State Structures and Conflict in Northern Somalia. Journal of Modern African Studies 44 (3): 397–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Höglund, Kristine, and Camilla Orjuela. 2012. Hybrid Peace Governance and Illiberal Peacebuilding in Sri Lanka. Global Governance 18 (1): 89–104.Google Scholar
  39. Hughes, Caroline. 2011. The Politics of Knowledge: Ethnicity, Capacity and Return in Post-conflict Reconstruction Policy. Review of International Studies 37 (4): 1493–1514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jarstad, Anna K., and L. Olsson. 2012. Hybrid Peace Ownership in Afghanistan: International Perspectives of Who Owns What and When. Global Governance 18 (1): 105–119.Google Scholar
  41. Kappler, Stefanie. 2015. They Dynamic Local: Delocalisation and (Re-)Localisation in the Search for Peacebuilding Identity. The Third World Quarterly 36 (5): 875–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Korten, David. 1990. Getting to the 21st Century: Voluntary Action and Global Agenda. West Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  43. Kumar, Chetan, and Jos De la Haye. 2012. Hybrid Peacemaking: Building National “Infrastructures for Peace”. Global Governance 18 (1): 13–20.Google Scholar
  44. Lee, SungYong, and Alpaslan Ӧzerdem (eds.). 2015. Local Ownership in International Peacebuilding: Key Theoretical and Practical Issues. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Lee, SungYong, and WookBeom Park. 2018. The Dual Track of Democracy Promotion in Post-war Peacebuilding in Cambodia: The Gap Between Institutional Development and Civil Society Mobilisation. Peacebuilding. Advance Publication.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2018.1498671.
  46. Lenski, Gerhard E. 1984. Power & Privilege: A Theory of Social Stratification. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  47. Lidén, Kristoffer. 2009. Building Peace Between Global and Local Politics: The Cosmopolitical Ethics of Liberal Peacebuilding. International Peacekeeping 16 (5): 616–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lilja, Mona, Mikael Baaz, and Stellan Vinthagen. 2015. Fighting with and Against the Time: The Environmental Movement’s Queering of Time as Resistance. Journal of Civil Society 11 (4): 408–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lukes, Steven. 2005. Power: A Radical View. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mac Ginty, Roger. 2008. Indigenous Peace-Making Versus the Liberal Peace. Cooperation and Conflict 43 (2): 139–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mac Ginty, Roger. 2011. International Peacebuilding and Local Resistance: Hybrid Forms of Peace. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mac Ginty, Roger. 2014. Everyday Peace: Bottom-Up and Local Agency in Conflict-Affected Societies. Security Dialogue 45 (6): 548–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mac Ginty, Roger, and Oliver P. Richmond. 2016. The Fallacy of Constructing Hybrid Political Orders: A Reappraisal of the Hybrid Turn in Peacebuilding. International Peacekeeping 23 (2): 219–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mackenzie-Smith, Alex. 2015. Complex Challenges Facing Contemporary Local Ownership Programmes: A Case Study of South Sudan. In Local Ownership in International Peacebuilding: Key Theoretical and Practical Issues, ed. SungYong Lee and Alpaslan Ӧzerdem, 55–73. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Mayall, James. 1996. The New Interventionism, 1991–1994: United Nations Experience in Cambodia, Former Yugoslavia and Somalia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Merry, Sally E. 2006. Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Mickler, D. 2013. UNAMID: A Hybrid Solution to a Human Security Problem in Darfur? Conflict, Security & Development 13 (5): 487–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Millar, Geroid. 2014. Disaggregating Hybridity: Why Hybrid Institutions Do Not Produce Predictable Experiences of Peace. Journal of Peace Research 51 (4): 501–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Moe, Louise Wiuff. 2009. Negotiating Political Legitimacy: The Case of State Formation in Post-conflict Somaliland. Issue Paper 10, Centre for International Governance and Justice, Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
  60. Moe, Louise Wiuff. 2015. The Strange Wars of Liberal Peace: Hybridity, Complexity and the Governing Rationalities of Counterinsurgency in Somalia. Peacebuilding 4 (1): 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nadarajah, S., and D. Rampton. 2015. The Limits of Hybridity and the Crisis of Liberal Peace. Review of International Studies 41 (1): 49–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Neuman, W.Lawrence. 2006. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Toronto: Pearson.Google Scholar
  63. Öjendal, Joakim, and Mona Lilja (eds.). 2009. Beyond Democracy in Cambodia: Political Reconstruction in a Post-conflict Society. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.Google Scholar
  64. Orr, Robert. 2005. Governing When Chaos Rules: Enhancing Governance and Participation. The Washington Quarterly 25 (4): 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Owen, John. 2010. Listening to the Rice Grow: The Local–Expat Interface in Lao-Based International NGOs. Development in Practice 20 (1): 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Paffenholz, Thania. 2015. Unpacking the Local Turn in Peacebuilding: A Critical Assessment Towards an Agenda for Future Research. Third World Quarterly 36 (5): 857–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Paris, Roland. 1997. Peacebuilding and the Limits of Liberal Internationalism. International Security 22 (2): 54–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Paris, Roland. 2010. Saving Liberal Peacebuilding. Review of International Studies 36 (2): 337–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pietz, Tobias, and Leopold von Carlowitz. 2007. Local Ownership in Peacebuilding Process in Failed States: Approaches, Experiences, and Prerequisites for Success. ZIF Report, Center for International Peace Operations (ZIF), Berlin.Google Scholar
  70. Raeymaekers, Timothy. 2013. Post-war Conflict and the Market for Protection: The Challenges to Congo’s Hybrid Peace. International Peacekeeping 20 (5): 600–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ramsbotham, Oliver, Tom Woodhouse, and Hugh Miall. 2011. Contemporary Conflict Resolution. London: Polity.Google Scholar
  72. Randazzo, Elisa. 2016. The Paradoxes of the ‘Everyday’: Scrutinizing the Local Turn in Peace Building. Third World Quarterly 37 (8): 1351–1370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Reich, Hannah. 2006. ‘Local Ownership’ in Conflict Transformation Projects: Partnership, Participation or Patronage? Berghof Occasional Paper 27, Berghof Research Center for Conflict Management, Berlin.Google Scholar
  74. Reynolds, Pamela, Olga Nieuwenhuys, and Karl Hanson. 2006. Refractions of Children’s Rights in Development Practice: A View from Anthropology. Childhood 13 (3): 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Richmond, Oliver. 2006. The Problem of Peace: Understanding the “Liberal Peace”. Conflict, Security & Development 6 (3): 291–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Richmond, Oliver. 2008. Reclaiming Peace in International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 36 (3): 439–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Richmond, Oliver P. 2009. Becoming Liberal, Unbecoming Liberalism: Liberal-Local Hybridity via the Everyday as a Response to the Paradoxes of Liberal Peacebuilding. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 3 (3): 324–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Richmond, Oliver. 2010. Resistance and the Post-liberal Peace. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 38 (3): 665–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Richmond, Oliver. 2011. Beyond Local Ownership in the Architecture of International Peacebuilding. Ethnopolitics 11 (4): 354–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Richmond, Oliver P. 2015. The Dilemmas of a Hybrid Peace: Negative or Positive? Cooperation and Conflict 50 (1): 50–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Mac Ginty, Roger, and Oliver Richmond. 2013. The Local Turn in Peacebuilding: A Critical Agenda for Peace. Third World Quarterly 34 (5): 763–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Richmond, Oliver, and Audra Mitchell. 2011. Hybrid Forms of Peace: From Everyday Agency to Post-liberalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  83. Scheye, Eric, and Gordon Peake. 2005. Unknotting Local Ownership. In After Intervention: Public Security Management in Post-conflict Societies: From Intervention to Sustainable Local Ownership, ed. Anja H. Ebnöther and Philipp Fluri. Vienna: Bureau for Security Policy at the Austrian Ministry of Defence.Google Scholar
  84. Scott, James. 1992. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Scott, James. 1987. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Shinoda, Hideaki. 2015. Local Ownership as a Strategic Guideline for Peacebuilding. In Local Ownership in International Peacebuilding: Key Theoretical and Practical Issues, ed. SungYong Lee and Alpaslan Ӧzerdem, 39–54. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  87. Smillie, Ian. 2001. Patronage or Partnership: Local Capacity Building in Humanitarian Crises. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  88. Sommers, M. 2002. Children, Education and War: Reaching Education for All (EFA) Objectives in Countries Affected by Conflict. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  89. Suhrke, Astri. 2007. Reconstruction as Modernisation: The ‘Post-conflict’ Project in Afghanistan. Third World Quarterly 28 (7): 1291–1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tadjbakhsh, Shahrbanou. 2011. Introduction: Liberal Peace in Dispute. In Rethinking the Liberal Peace: External Models and Local Alternatives, ed. Shahrbanou Tadjbakhsh, 1–16. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Tardy, Thierry. 2014. Hybrid Peace Operations: Rationale and Challenges. Global Governance 20 (1): 95–118.Google Scholar
  92. Thiessen, Chuck. 2013. Local Ownership of Peacebuilding in Afghanistan: Shouldering Responsibility for Sustainable Peace and Development. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  93. Tom, Patrick. 2013. In Search for Emancipatory Hybridity: The Case of Post-war Sierra Leone. Peacebuilding 1 (2): 239–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. UNSG. 2002. United Nations System Support for Capacity Building: Report of the Secretary-General. UN doc E/2002/58 (14 May 2002), United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
  95. UNSG. 2004. The Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-conflict Societies. UN doc S/2004/616 (23 August 2004), United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
  96. Vinthagen, Stellan, and Mona Lilja. 2015. Resistance Studies Mission Statement. Available at http://www.resistancestudies.org/files/Missions-tatement.doc. Accessed 12 Feb 2015.
  97. Wallis, Joanne. 2012. Building a Liberal-Local Hybrid Peace and State in Bougainville. Pacific Review 25 (5): 613–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wallis, Joanne, Renee Jeffery, and Lisa Kent. 2016. Political Reconciliation in Timor Leste, Solomon Islands and Bougainville: The Dark Side of Hybridity. Australian Journal of International Affairs 70 (2): 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Wetterberg, Anna, Derick Brinkerhoff, and Jana Hertz. 2015. From Compliant to Capable: Balanced Capacity Development for Local Organisations. Development in Practice 25 (7): 966–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. White, S. 2002. Being, Becoming and Relationship: Conceptual Challenges of a Child Rights Approach in Development. Journal of International Development 14 (8): 1095–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Woodhead, Martin. 2006. Changing Perspectives on Early Childhood: Theory, Research and Policy. Background paper prepared for the Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2007, UNESCO. Available at http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001474/147499e.pdf. Accessed 16 June 2018.
  102. Zaum, Dominik. 2012. Beyond the “Liberal Peace”. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 18 (1): 121–132.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations