Advertisement

A Programming Language Independent Platform for Algorithm Learning

  • Bruno BurkeEmail author
  • Peter Weßeler
  • Jürgen te Vrugt
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11082)

Abstract

Teaching People to program is a crucial requirement for our society to deal with the complexity of 21st-century challenges. In many teaching systems, the student is required to use a particular programming language or development environment. This paper presents an intelligent tutoring system to support blended learning scenarios, where the students can choose their programming language and development environment. For that, the system provides an interface where the students request test data and submit results to unit test their algorithms. The submitted results are analyzed by a machine learning system that detects common errors and provides adaptive feedback to the student. With this system, we are focusing on teaching algorithms rather than specific programming language semantics. The technical evaluation tested with the implementation of Mean and Median algorithm shows that the system can distinguish between error cases with an error rate under 20%. A first survey, with a small group of students, shows that the system helps them detect common errors and arrive at a correct/valid solution. We are in the process of testing the system with a larger group of students for gathering statistically reliable data.

Keywords

Language-independent programming Tutoring system Algorithm learning 

References

  1. 1.
    Bishop, C.M.: Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Oxford University Press Inc., New York (1995)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bott, O.J., Fricke, P., Priss, U., Striewe, M.: Automatisierte Bewertung in der Programmierausbildung. Waxmann Verlag, Münster (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Flach, P.: Machine Learning: The Art and Science of Algorithms That Make Sense of Data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Helmke, A.: Unterrichtsqualität und Lehrerprofessionalität: Diagnose, Evaluation und Verbesserung des Unterrichts. Kallmeyer, Seelze-Velber (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vieira, S.M., Kaymak, U., Sousa, J.M.C.: Cohen’s kappa coefficient as a performance measure for feature selection. In: International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 1–8, July 2010.  https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZY.2010.5584447
  6. 6.
    Waldherr, F., Walter, C.: Didaktisch und praktisch: Ideen und Methoden für die Hochschullehre, 2nd edn. Schäffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wu, X., et al.: Top 10 algorithms in data mining, January 2008.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-007-0114-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wandelwerk Quality Management UnitMünster University of Applied SciencesSteinfurtGermany
  2. 2.Department Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceMünster University of Applied SciencesSteinfurtGermany

Personalised recommendations