High Accuracy Laser Power Measurement for Laser Pointers Safety Assessment

  • Kanokwan NontapotEmail author
  • Narat Rujirat
Part of the Springer Series in Optical Sciences book series (SSOS, volume 218)


Laser pointers are common tools for teachers, students, and researchers as pointer devices in classrooms or meeting rooms. Some people use laser pointers for toys, hobbies and entertainments. For safety concern, these laser pointers are designed to emit laser power level below 5 mW as restricted by many countries regulations. However, advances in laser technology, allowed the production of low low-cost laser pointer devices, at a wide range of visible wavelengths, delivering considerable light output power, which are available for the general public. In fact it is now common, to have laser pointers and laser gadgets of all colors and power range, from few mW to several watts available to buy. As a result, laser pointers are in the hands of uninformed people about the potential injuries that can arise from the handling of these devices. This is resulting in a worldwide increase of retinal injuries reporting. In this research, the laser power levels of randomly purchased laser pointers in Thailand markets will be assessed in order to check the accuracy of their laser safety labels, using a dedicated laser pointer power testing kit developed at National Institute of Metrology (Thailand). A set of twenty laser pointers, red, green and violet, randomly acquired in market have been assessed with respect to their power output level and emitted wavelengths lines. The limits imposed by The US Code of Federal regulations for lasers devices will be used as a reference.



This work is supported by the new researcher scholarship of CSTS, MOST project, which is sponsored by the Coordinating Center for Thai Government Science and Technology Scholarship Students (CSTS), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA).


  1. 1.
    R. Wong, D. Sim, R. Rajendram, G. Menon, Class 3A laser pointer-induced retinal damage captured on optical coherence tomography. Acta Ophthalmol. Scand. 85(2), 227–228 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Wyrsch, P.B. Baenninger, M.K. Schmid, Retinal injuries from a handheld laser pointer. N. Engl. J. Med. 363(11), 1089–1091 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. Ziahosseini, J.P. Doris, G.S. Turner, Maculopathy from handheld green diode laser pointer. BMJ 340(1), c2982–c2982 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sydney Morning Herald, Laser Pointers Restricted After Attacks (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Blattner, The underrated hazard potential of laser pointers, in METinfo18 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. John, H. Michael, K. Marina, Laser product assessment for Lancashire County Council Trading Standards Service, in Proceedings of the 2013 International Laser Safety (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. Trevor, Proceedings of the 2013 International Laser Safety Conference, Orlando, FL (2013), pp. 48–54Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Joshua, D. Marla, Accurate, inexpensive testing of laser pointer for safe operation. Meas. Sci. Technol. 24, 045202 (7 pp.) (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Joshua, Random testing reveals excessive power in commercial laser pointers. Presentation at the International Laser Safety Conference, Orlando, FL, 20 Mar 2013Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Performance Standards for Light-Emitting Products, CFR 2012 Code of Federal Regualtions, Title 21. Food and Drug; Part 1040; Section 1040.10 Laser Products (US 21 CFR 1040.10)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC 2007 Safety of Laser Products. Part 1: Equipment classification and requirements, EN 60825-1 ed.2 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    ANSI 2007 Laser Institute of America, American National Standard for the Safe Use of Lasers ANSI Z136.1, Orlando (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. Han, IEC60825 MPE Js, image (2007),
  14. 14.
    International Electrotechnical Commission, Safety of laser products—Part 1: Equipment classfication and requirements (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Kai, Response silicon photodiode, image (2009),
  16. 16.
    N. Taylor, C. Kuyatt, Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results. NIST technical Note 1297 (1994)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, Evaluation of measurement data Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of MetrologyPathum ThaniThailand

Personalised recommendations