Advertisement

Difficulties Facing Children in Learning English as a Foreign Language in the Libyan Context

  • Deya AL-Osta Omar
  • Ahmed Gaibani
  • Fadil Elmenfi
Chapter

Abstract

This study sought to examine the difficulties facing the Libyan children, medically normal, in learning English. To carry out the investigation, the mixed-method approach was adopted. Two questionnaires comprising close-ended and open-ended items were administered to 50 parents and 10 EFL teachers. An interview survey was carried out with 12 pupils from different but representative academic levels. The results of the investigation revealed that for these Libyan children, learning English had been difficult mainly because of their parents’ weak English competence, inadequate teaching strategies exercised on the part of their teachers, learning sans educational means, and the debilitating political situation in their country. The findings of this study are anticipated to help to pinpoint the factors that pose English learning difficulties to the concerned students. This information may prove to be useful in redesigning essential instruction and the relevant teaching strategies for young learners without any performance complications.

Keywords

Language acquisition Children Age Language learning Society Motivating 

References

  1. Carey, S. (2000). Science education as conceptual change. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cook, V. (2003). Changing the first language in the L2 user’s mind: Draft of intro to L2 effects on the L1. Retrieved from http://www.viviancook.uk/Writings/Papers/FXintro.htm.
  3. Cook, V. (2013). Second language learning and language teaching. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Cook, V. J. (1991). The poverty-of-the-stimulus argument and multicompetence. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin (Utrecht), 7(2), 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. David, B. (2005). Age and second language acquisition and processing; A selective overview. Austin: University of Texas.Google Scholar
  6. DeKeyser, R., & Larson-Hall, J. (2005). What does the critical period really mean? In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 88–108). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Elabbar, A. A. (2011). An investigation of influences affecting Libyan English as foreign language university teachers (LEFLUTs): Teaching approaches in the language classrooms (Doctoral dissertation). University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
  8. Farrar, M. J., Friend, M. J., & Forbes, J. N. (1993). Event knowledge and early language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 20(3), 591–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fischer, K. W. (1980). A theory of cognitive development: The control and construction of hierarchies of skills. Psychological Review, 87(6), 477–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fodor, J. A. (1985). Precis of the modularity of mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8(1), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21(1), 60–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2009). Nativism vs. neuro-constructivism: Rethinking the study of developmental disorders. Developmental Psychology, 45(1), 56–63.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lakoff, G. (1990). The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image schemas? Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 39–74.  https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). The biological foundations of language. Hospital Practice, 2(12), 59–67.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.1967.11707799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mounoud, P. (1993). The emergence of new skills: Dialectic relations between knowledge systems. In G. J. P. Savelsbergh (Ed.), Advances in psychology, Vol. 97: The development of coordination in infancy (pp. 13–46). Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier Science Publishers. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)60948-6.
  16. Penfield, W., & Roberts, L. (1959). Speech and brain mechanism. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Saville-Troike, M. (2003). Extending “communicative” concepts in the second language curriculum: A sociolinguistic perspective. In D. L. Lange & R. M. Paige (Eds.), Culture as core: Interdisciplinary perspectives on culture in the second language classroom (pp. 3–17). Minneapolis and Greenwich, CT: University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Campus and Information Age.Google Scholar
  18. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2011). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (5th ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Skehan, P. (2002). Theorising and updating aptitude. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 69–94). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  20. Spelke, E. S. (1991). Physical knowledge in infancy: Reflections on Piaget’s theory. In S. Carey & R. Gelman (Eds.), The epigenesis of mind: Essays on biology and cognition (pp. 133–169). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Tomasello, M. (Ed.). (2014). The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure. New York: Taylor & Francis and Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  22. Troike, M. S. (2006). Introducing second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Ulrich, W. (1953). Languages in contact, findings and problems. New York: Linguistic Circle of New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deya AL-Osta Omar
    • 1
  • Ahmed Gaibani
    • 2
  • Fadil Elmenfi
    • 2
  1. 1.Omar Al-Mukhtar UniversityDernaLibya
  2. 2.Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of EnglishOmar Al-Mukhtar UniversityDernaLibya

Personalised recommendations