Advertisement

Situated Cosmopolitans: Mixed Marriage Individuals and the Obstacles to Identity Change

  • Jennifer Todd
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Compromise after Conflict book series (PSCAC)

Abstract

This chapter challenges the view that the persistence of macro-social division is a product of unchanging identities. It presents a type of experiment. It takes very similar mixed marriage individuals who are as if immune to ethnic solidarity in three contrasting research sites and compares their narratives of identity change. If division is a product of unchanging ethnic identities, then these ‘non-ethnic’ respondents should narrate similar processes of change in each research site. If it is due to socio-cultural obstacles to sustaining change, then the Northern Ireland respondents should narrate much greater difficulties than the others. The latter is the case. Identity change is difficult to sustain in divided societies even for the most open of individuals because it involves challenging and changing basic values and assumptions without institutional support or cultural signposts. Social division persists not because identity is static but because it changes, and the identity changes cannot be sustained.

Keywords

Protestantism Catholicism Endogamy Family Northern Ireland Republic of Ireland The Gard, France Free-movers Religion Experimental method Obstacles to identity change Radical moral questioning 

References

  1. Abulof, U. (2015). The Mortality and Morality of Nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, G. S. (1981). A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bowen, K. (1983). Protestants in a Catholic State: Ireland’s Privileged Minority. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Brewer, J. (1998). Anti-Catholicism in Northern Ireland 1600–1998. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brubaker, R., & Laitin, D. D. (1998). Ethnic and Nationalist Violence. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 423–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bystydzienski, J. M. (2011). Intercultural Couples: Crossing Boundaries, Negotiating Difference. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Canetti, D. (2017). Emotional Distress, Conflict Ideology, and Radicalisation. Political Science and Politics, 50(4), 940–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Canetti, D., Elad-Strenger, J., Lavi, I., Guy, D., & Bar-Tal, D. (2015). Exposure to Violence, Ethos of Conflict, and Support for Compromise: Surveys in Israel, East Jerusalem, West Bank, and Gaza. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1(30), 84–113.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002715569771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chareyres, P. (1999). La population de la Vaunage au XXe siècle. In J. Roger (Ed.), La Vaunage au XXe Siècle (pp. 169–176). Nîmes: BROCHE.Google Scholar
  10. Collet, B. (2010). Pluralité contemporaine de la mixité conjugale et position asymétrique entre les sexes. Diasporas, Histoire et Société, 15, 53–67.Google Scholar
  11. Collet, B., Philippe, C., & Varro, G. (Eds.). (2008). Mixité(s). Variations autour d’une notion transversale. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  12. Compton, P. A., & Coward, J. (1989). Fertility and Family Planning in Northern Ireland. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
  13. Connor, W. (1994). Ethno-nationalism: The Quest for Understanding. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Favell, A. (2008). Eurostars and Eurocities: Free Movement and Mobility in an Integrating Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fernihough, A., O’Grada, C., & Walsh, B. (2014, March 30). Mixed Marriages in Ireland a Century Ago. Online. Retrieved June 26, 2018, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2412147.
  16. Finnas, F., & O’Leary, R. (2003). Choosing for the Children: The Affiliation of the Children of Minority-Majority Group Intermarriages. European Sociological Review, 19(5), 483–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garrigan, S. (2010). The Real Peace Process: Worship, Politics and the End of Sectarianism. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
  18. Gaspar, S. (2009). Mixed Marriages between European Free Movers. CIES e-Working Paper No. 65/2009. Retrieved June 26, 2018, from https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/publications/mixed-marriages-between-european-free-movers/43152.
  19. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Harris, R. (1972). Prejudice and Tolerance in Ulster: A Study of Neighbours and ‘Strangers’ in a Border Community. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Jameson, D. (2014). The Religious Upbringing of Children in Mixed Marriages: The Evolution of Irish Law. New Hibernia Review, 18(2), 65–83. Retrieved June 26, 2018, from http://muse.jhu.edu.ucd.idm.oclc.org/article/549138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Joutard, P. (1997). Le Musée du Désert. In P. Nora (Ed.), Les Lieux de Memoire (Vol. III, pp. 2653–2677). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  23. Kelly, B., & Sinclair, R. (2005). Understanding and Negotiating Identity: Children from Cross-community Families in Public Care in Northern Ireland. Child and Family Social Work, 10(4), 331–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Laitin, D. D. (2007). Nations, States and Violence. Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee, R. (1979). Interreligious Courtship in NI. In M. Cox & G. Wilson (Eds.), Love and Attraction: An International Conference (pp. 167–169). Oxford: Pegamon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee, R. M. (1985). Intermarriage, Conflict and Social Control in Ireland: The Decree ‘Ne temere’. The Economic and Social Review, 17(1), 11–27.Google Scholar
  27. Lee, R. M. (1994). Mixed and Matched. Interreligious Courtship and Marriage in Northern Ireland. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  28. LeGall, J., & Meintel, D. (2015). Cultural and Identity Transmission in Mixed Couples in Quebec, Canada. Normalizing Plural Identities as a Path to Social Integration. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 622, 112–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lehrer, E. L. (2004). Religion as a Determinant of Economic and Demographic Behavior in the United States. IZA Discussion Paper Series, 1390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leonard, M. (2009). It’s Better to Stick to Your Own Kind’: Teenagers’ Views on Cross-Community Marriages in Northern Ireland. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(1), 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lloyd, K., & Robinson, G. (2008). Intimate Mixing – Bridging the Gap? Catholic-Protestant Relationships in Northern Ireland. ARK Research Update No. 54. Retrieved June 26, 2018, from http://www.ark.ac.uk/publications/updates/update54.pdf.
  32. McAloney, K. (2013). ‘Mixed’ Religion Relationships and Well-being in Northern Ireland. Journal of Religious Health, 53(4), 1036–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McAuley, J. (2016). Very British Rebels? The Culture and Politics of Ulster Loyalism. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  34. McFarlane, W. G. (1979). Mixed Marriages in Ballycuan, Northern Ireland. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 10(2), 191–205.Google Scholar
  35. Medding, P. Y., Tobin, G. A., Fishman, S. B., & Rimor, M. (1992). Jewish Identity in Conversionary and Mixed Marriages. The American Jewish Year Book, 92, 3–76.Google Scholar
  36. Morgan, V., Smyth, M., Robinson, G., & Fraser, G. (1996). Mixed Marriages in Northern Ireland, Institutional Responses. University of Ulster Centre for the Study of Conflict. Retrieved June 26, 2018, from http://cain.ulst.ac.uk/csc/reports/mixed.htm.
  37. Moxon Browne, E. (1983). Nation, Class and Creed in Northern Ireland. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  38. Murray, D. (1985). Worlds Apart: Segregated Schools in Northern Ireland. Belfast: Appletree Press.Google Scholar
  39. Rodrigues Garcia, D. (2015). Intermarriage and Integration Revisited. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 662(1), 8–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ruane, J. (2010). Ethnicity, Religion and Peoplehood: Protestants in France and in Ireland. Ethnopolitics, 9(1), 121–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ruane, J. (2014a). After Conflict: Protestant Identity in the Gard Today. In P. Benedict, H. Daussy, & P.-O. Léchot (Eds.), Histoire, mémoire et identités en mutation: Les huguenots en France et en diaspora, XVIe–XXe siècles. Paris: Droz.Google Scholar
  42. Ruane, J. (2014b). Comparing Protestant–Catholic Conflict in France and Ireland: The Significance of the Ethnic and Colonial Dimension. In J. Wolffe (Ed.), Irish Religious Conflict in Comparative Perspective. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  43. Rumelili, B. (2015). Ontological (In)security and Peace Anxieties: A Framework for Conflict Resolution. In B. Rumelili (Ed.), Conflict Resolution and Ontological Security: Peace Anxieties (pp. 10–29). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Taylor, C. (1976). Responsibility for Self. In A. O. Rorty (Ed.), The Identity of Persons (pp. 281–300). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  45. Telles, E. E., & Sue, C. A. (2009). Race Mixture: Boundary Crossing in Comparative Perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 35(1), 129–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer Todd
    • 1
  1. 1.Geary InstituteUniversity College DublinDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations