Advertisement

Introduction to CNS Intraoperative Cytopathology

  • César R. Lacruz
  • Javier Saénz de Santamaría
  • Ricardo H. Bardales
Chapter
Part of the Essentials in Cytopathology book series (EICP, volume 13)

Abstract

Even in the current age of advanced neuroimaging and image-guided biopsies, intraoperative consultation is essential for evaluating CNS lesions and providing firm grounds for decision making and guide surgical approach. Likewise, intraoperative consultation is necessary to avoid non-diagnostic biopsies by confirming that the specimen obtained is adequate for an accurate final diagnosis. Intraoperative cytology is a rapid diagnostic modality with >90% diagnostic accuracy. This chapter reviews this topic and also includes a historical overview of the squash/smear technique and a summary of the 2016 updated WHO classification of the CNS tumors.

Keywords

Intraoperative brain assessment Brain tumors Cytology Squash preparation Smear preparation Stereotactic biopsy Historical background Accuracy Brain tumor classification 

Suggested Reading

  1. Agrawal M, Chandrakar SK, Lokwani D, Purohit MR. Squash cytology in neurosurgical practice: a useful method in resource-limited setting with lack of a frozen section facility. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8:FC09–FC012.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Bleggi-Torres LF, de Noronha L, Schneider Gugelmin E, Martins Sebastião AP, et al. Accuracy of the smear technique in the cytological diagnosis of 650 lesions of the central nervous system. Diagn Cytopathol. 2001;24:293–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brainard JA, Prayson RA, Barnett GH. Frozen section evaluation of stereotactic brain biopsies. Diagnostic yield at the stereotactic target position in 188 cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997;121:481–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brommeland T, Lindal S, Straume B, Dahl IL, Henning R. Does imprint cytology of brain tumors improve intraoperative diagnoses? Acta Neurol Scand. 2003;108:153–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cahill EM, Hidvegi DF. Crush preparations of lesions of the central nervous system. A useful adjunct to the frozen section. Acta Cytol. 1985;29:279–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Di Stefano D, Scucchi LF, Cosentino L, Bosman C, Vecchione A. Intraoperative diagnosis of nervous system lesions. Acta Cytol. 1998;42:346–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dudgeon LS, Patrick CV. A new method for the rapid microscopical diagnosis of tumors: With an account of 200 cases so examined. Brit J Surg. 1927;15:250–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eisenhardt L, Cushing H. Diagnosis of intracranial tumors by supravital technique. Am J Pathol. 1930;6:541–2.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Firlik KS, Martinez AJ, Lundsford LD. Use of cytological preparations for the intraoperative diagnosis of stereotactically obtained brain biopsies: A 19-year experience and survey of neuropathologists. Neurosurgery. 1999;91:454–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Folkerth RD. Smears and frozen sections in the intraoperative diagnosis of central nervous system lesions. Neurosurg Clin North Am. 1994;5:1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ghosal N, Hegde AS, Murthy G, Furtado SV. Smear preparation of intracranial lesions: A retrospective study of 306 cases. Acta Cytopathol. 2011;39:582–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goel D, Sundaram C, Paul TR, Uppin SG, et al. Intraoperative cytology (squash smear) in neurosurgical practice - pitfalls in diagnosis experience based on 3057 samples from a single institution. Cytopathology. 2007;18:300–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guarda LA. Intraoperative cytologic diagnosis: evaluation of 370 consecutive intraoperative cytologies. Diagn Cytopathol. 1990;6:235–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hamasaki M, Chang KHF, Nabeshima K, Tauchi-Nishi PS. Intraoperative squash and touch preparation cytology of brain lesions stained with H+E and Diff-Quik™. A 20-year retrospective analysis and comparative literature review. Acta Cytol. 2018;62:44–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hayden R, Cajulis RS, Frias-Hidvegi D, Brody BA, Yu G, Levy R. Intraoperative diagnostic techniques for stereotactic brain biopsies: cytology versus frozen-section histopathology. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1995;65:187–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Iqbal M, Shah A, Wani MA, Kirmani A, Ramzan A. Cytopathology of the central nervous system. I. Utility of crush smear cytology in intraoperative diagnosis of central nervous system lesions. Acta Cytol. 2006;50:608–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ironside JW. Update on central nervous system cytopathology. II. Brain smear technique. J Clin Pathol. 1994;47:683–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jaiswall S, Mukul V, Jaiswal AK, Behari S. Intraoperative squash cytology of central nervous system lesions. A single center study of 326 cases. Diagn cytopathol. 2012;40:104–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jane JA, Bertrand G. A cytological method for the diagnosis of tumors affecting the central nervous system. J Neuropath Exp Neurol. 1962;21:400–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jane JA, Yashon D. Cytology of tumors affecting the nervous system. Springfield, Illinois: Charkles C Thomas; 1969.Google Scholar
  21. Kishore S, Bhardwaj A, Kusum A, Thakur B, Kaushik S, Sharma N. Intraoperative squash cytology of central nervous system and spinal cord lesions with histological correlation. Ann Pathol Lab Med. 2016;3:61–72.Google Scholar
  22. Krishnani N, Kumari N, Behari S, Rana C, Gupta P. Intraoperative squash cytology: accuracy and impact on immediate surgical management of central nervous system tumors. Cytopathology. 2012;23:308–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lacruz CR, Escalona J. Diagnóstico citológico de los tumores del sistema nervioso central. Barcelona: César Viguera; 2000.Google Scholar
  24. Liwnicz BH, Henderson KS, Masukawa T, Smith RD. Needle aspiration cytology of intracranial lesions: A review of 84 cases. Acta Cytol. 1982;26:779–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, editors. WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system (Revised 4th ed). Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC); 2016a.Google Scholar
  26. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, et al. The 2016 world health organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016b;13:803–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marshall LF, Adams H, Doyle D, Graham DI. The histological accuracy of the smear technique for neurosurgical biopsies. J Neurosurg. 1973;39:82–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Martinez AJ, Pollack I, Hall WA, Lunsford LD. Touch preparations in the rapid intraoperative diagnosis of central nervous system lesions. A comparison with frozen sections and paraffin-embedded sections. Mod Pathol. 1988;1:378–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. McMenemey WH. An appraisal of smear diagnosis in neurosurgery. Am J Clin Pathol. 1960;33:471–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mitra S, Kumar M, Sharma V, Mukhopadhyay D. Squash preparation. a reliable diagnostic tool in the intraoperative diagnosis of central nervous system tumors. J Cytol. 2010;27:81–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Morris AA. The use of the smear technique in the rapid histological diagnosis of tumors of the central nervous system. Description of a new staining method. J Neurosurg. 1947;4:497–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mouriquand C, Benabid AL, Breyton M. Stereotaxic cytology of brain tumors. Review of an eight year experience. Acta Cytol. 1987;31:756–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Nanarng V, Jacob S, Mahapatra D, Mathew JE. Intraoperative diagnosis of central nervous system lesions: comparison of squash smear, touch imprint, and frozen section. J Cytol. 2015;32:153–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. O'Neill KS, Dyer PV, Bell BA, Wilkins PR, Uttley D, Marsh HT. Is perioperative smear cytology necessary for CT-guided stereotaxic biopsy? Br J Neurosurg. 1992;6:421–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ostertag CB, Mennel HD, Kiessling M. Stereotaxic biopsy of brain tumors. Surg Neurol. 1980;14:275–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Plesec TP, Prayson RA. Frozen section discrepancy in the evaluation of central nervous system tumors. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007;131:1532–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Plesec TP, Prayson RA. Frozen section discrepancy in the evaluation of nonneoplastic central nervous system samples. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2009;13:359–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Reyes MG, Homsi FM, McDonald LW, Glick RPI. smears, and frozen sections of brain tumors. Neurosurgery. 1991;29:575–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Roessler K, Dietrich W, Kitz K. High diagnostic accuracy of cytologic smears of central nervous system tumors. A 15-years’ experience based on 4172 patients. Acta Cytol. 2002;46:667–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Russell DS, Krayenbühl H, Cairns H. The wet film technique in the histological diagnosis of intracranial tumors; a rapid method. J Path Bac.t. 1937;45:501–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Savargaonkar P, Farmer PM. Utility of intra-operative consultations for the diagnosis of central nervous system lesions. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2001;31:133–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Shah AB, Muzumdar GA, Chitale AR, Bhagwati SN. Squash preparation and frozen section in intraoperative diagnosis of central nervous system tumours. Acta Cytol. 1998;42:1149–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sharma S, Deb P. Intraoperative neurocytology of primary central nervous system neoplasia: a simplified and practical diagnostic approach. J Cytol. 2011;28:147–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Silverman JF, Timmons RL, Leonard JR, Hardy IM, et al. Cytologic results of fine-needle aspiration aspiration biopsies of the central nervous system. Cancer. 1986;58:1117–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Torres LFB, Collaço LM. Smear technique for the intraoperative examination of nervous system lesions. Acta Cytol. 1993;37:34–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Wilkerson JA, Bonnin JM. Intraoperative cytology. An adjunct to frozen sections. New York: Igaku-Shoin; 1987.Google Scholar
  47. Willems JGMS, Alva-Willems JM. Accuracy of cytologic diagnosis of central nervous system neoplasms in stereotactic biopsies. Acta Cytol. 1984;28:243–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhang YX, Luo KS, Liv JC, Chen Y, Chen YH, Lai RS. Cytological diagnosis of 500 cases of intracranial tumors during craniotomy. Chin J Clin Cytol. 1987;3:19–27.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • César R. Lacruz
    • 1
  • Javier Saénz de Santamaría
    • 2
  • Ricardo H. Bardales
    • 3
  1. 1.Professor of PathologyComplutense University School of MedicineMadridSpain
  2. 2.Professor of PathologyUniversity Hospital Extremadura, Medical SchoolBadajozSpain
  3. 3.Pathologist, Director Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration ServiceOutpatient Pathology Associates / Precision PathologySacramentoUSA

Personalised recommendations