Advertisement

An Intersectional Approach to Teaching and Learning About Humans and Other Animals in Educational Contexts

  • Constance RussellEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Education and the Environment book series (PSEE)

Abstract

Taking an intersectional approach to teaching and learning about animal-focused education, this chapter highlights the entanglement of animal, environmental, and social justice issues. Reflecting on an online elective course, Animals in Education designed for Master of Education (MEd) students with diverse disciplinary backgrounds and professional experiences, this chapter zeroes in on three key matters: the possibilities and pitfalls of online learning; unpacking the hidden curriculum of human/animal relationships and engaging in intersectional analyses, for which critical food education is particularly illuminating; and the emotional dimensions of animal-focused education, including students attending to their own affective responses and probing the use of cartoons and graphic content in a pedagogy of discomfort.

References

  1. Andrzejewski, J., Pedersen, H., & Wicklund, F. (2009). Interspecies education for humans, animals, and the earth. In Social justice, peace, and environmental education: Transformative standards (pp. 136–154). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Aneja, A. (2017). Blending in: Reconciling feminist pedagogy and distance education across cultures. Gender and Education, 29(7), 850–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banas, J., Dunbar, N., Rodriguez, D., & Liu, S. (2011). A review of humor in educational settings: Four decades of research. Communication Education, 60(1), 115–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell, A., & Russell, C. (1999). Life ties: Disrupting anthropocentrism in language arts education. In J. Robertson (Ed.), Teaching for a tolerant world: Grades K-6: Essays and resources (pp. 68–89). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
  5. Bell, A., & Russell, C. (2000). Beyond human, beyond words: Anthropocentrism, critical pedagogy, and the poststructuralist turn. Canadian Journal of Education, 25(3), 188–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boileau, E., & Russell, C. (2018). Insect and human flourishing in early childhood education: Learning and crawling together. In A. Cutter-Mackenzie, K. Malone, & E. Barratt Hacking (Eds.), Research handbook on childhoodnature: Assemblages of childhood and nature. New York, NY: Springer. Advance of print.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51949-4_65-1.Google Scholar
  7. Boler, M. (1999). Feeling power: Emotions and education. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Breunig, M., Murtell, J., Russell, C., & Howard, R. (2014). The impact of integrated environmental studies programs: Are students motivated to act pro-environmentally? Environmental Education Research, 20(3), 372–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caduto, M., & Bruchac, J. (1991). All our relations: Of humans and animals. In Keepers of the animals: Native American stories and wildlife activities for children (pp. 3–10). Saskatoon, SK: Fifth House.Google Scholar
  10. Cho, S., Crenshaw, K., & McCall, L. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs, 38(4), 785–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Corman, L. (2017). Ideological monkey wrenching: Nonhuman animal politics beyond suffering. In D. Nibert (Ed.), Animal oppression and capitalism, Volume 2: The oppressive and destructive role of capitalism (pp. 252–269). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger Press.Google Scholar
  12. Corman, L., & Vandrovcová, T. (2014). Radical humility: Toward a more holistic critical animal studies pedagogy). In A. Nocella, J. Sorenson, K. Socha, & A. Matsuoka (Eds.), Defining critical animal studies: An introduction to an intersectional social justice approach to animal liberation (pp. 135–157). New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  13. Deckha, M. (2008). Intersectionality and posthumanist visions of equality. Wisconsin Journal of Law, Gender and Society, 23(2), 249–267.Google Scholar
  14. Dyment, J., Downing, J., Hill, A., & Smith, H. (2017). “I did think it was a bit strange taking outdoor education online”: Exploration of initial teacher education students’ online learning experiences in a tertiary outdoor education unit. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 18(1), 70–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fawcett, L. (2013). Three degrees of separation: Accounting for naturecultures in environmental education research. In R. Stevenson, M. Brody, J. Dillon, & A. Wals (Eds.), International handbook of research on environmental education (pp. 409–417). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Fawcett, L. (2014). Kinship imaginaries: Children’s stories of wild friendships, fear, and freedom. In G. Marvin & S. McHugh (Eds.), Routledge handbook of human-animal studies (pp. 259–274). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Fawcett, L., Bell, A., & Russell, C. (2002). Guiding our environmental praxis: Teaching for social and environmental justice. In W. Leal Filho (Ed.), Teaching sustainability at universities: Towards curriculum greening (pp. 223–238). New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  18. Fox, L. (Director). (2003). The Meatrix [animated video]. Oakland, CA: Free Range Studios.Google Scholar
  19. Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hatch, A. (2007). The view from all fours: A look at an animal-assisted activity program from the animals’ perspective. Anthrozoös, 20(1), 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jensen, D. (2013). Against forgetting. Orion, July/August, 11–12.Google Scholar
  22. Kahn, R. (2008). Towards ecopedagogy: Weaving a broad-based pedagogy of liberation for animals, nature, and the oppressed people of the earth. In A. Darder, M. Baltodano, & R. Torres (Eds.), The critical pedagogy reader (2nd ed., pp. 552–540). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Kahn, R. (2016). Afterword. In S. Rice & A. G. Rud (Eds.), The educational significance of human and non-human animal interactions (pp. 215–226). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. Kelsey, E., & Armstrong, C. (2012). Finding hope in a world of environmental catastrophe. In A. Wals & P. Corcoran (Eds.), Learning for sustainability in times of accelerating change (pp. 187–200). Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Larson, G. (1989). The prehistory of The Far Side: A 10th anniversary exhibit. New York, NY: Andrews & McMeel.Google Scholar
  26. Lewandowski, J., van Barneveld, A., & Ertmer, P. (2016). Posting with intentionality in online instruction: Supporting instructors’ facilitation efforts. Educational Technology, 56, 15–21.Google Scholar
  27. Livingston, J. (1981). The fallacy of wildlife conservation. Toronto, ON: McClelland & Stewart.Google Scholar
  28. Lloro-Bidart, T. (2017). Neoliberal and disciplinary environmentality and “sustainable seafood” consumption: Storying environmentally responsible action. Environmental Education Research, 23(8), 1182–1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lloro-Bidart, T. (2018a). Cultivating affects: A feminist posthumanist analysis of invertebrate and human performativity in an urban community garden. Emotion, Space and Society, 27, 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lloro-Bidart, T. (2018b). A feminist posthumanist ecopedagogy in/for/with animalscapes. Journal of Environmental Education, 49(2), 152–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lloro-Bidart, T., & Finewood, M. (2018). Intersectional feminism for the environmental studies and sciences: Looking inward and outward. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 8, 142–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lupinacci, J. (2018). Comics in the classroom: Liberation and everyday superheroes). In J. L. Schatz & S. Parson (Eds.), Superheroes and critical animals studies: The heroic beasts of total liberation (pp. 3–17). New York, NY: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  33. Lupinacci, J., & Happel-Parkins, A. (2016). (Un)learning anthropocentrism: An ecojustice framework for teaching to resist human-supremacy in schools. In S. Rice & A. G. Rud (Eds.), The educational significance of human and non-human animal interactions (pp. 13–30). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  34. Lyman, K. (2014). Lessons from a garden spider: How Charlotte transformed my classroom. In B. Bigelow & T. Swinehart (Eds.), A people’s curriculum for the Earth (pp. 48–51). Milwaulkee, WI: Rethinking Schools.Google Scholar
  35. Maina-Okori, N., Koushik, J., & Wilson, A. (2017). Reimagining intersectionality in environmental and sustainability education: A critical literature review. Journal of Environmental Education, 49(4), 286–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McKenzie, M., Russell, C., Fawcett, L., & Timmerman, N. (2010). Popular media, intersubjective learning, and cultural production. In R. Stevenson & J. Dillon (Eds.), Environmental education: Learning, culture and agency (pp. 147–164). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.Google Scholar
  37. Meyer, K. (2003). Face-to-face versus threaded discussions: The role of time and higher-order thinking. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 55–65.Google Scholar
  38. Morreall, J. (2014). Humor, philosophy, and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(2), 120–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Oakley, J. (2009). Under the knife: Animal dissection as a contested school science activity. Journal for Activist Science & Technology Education, 1(2), 59–67.Google Scholar
  40. Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., & Nxumalo, F. (2015). Unruly raccoons and troubled educators: Nature/culture divides in a childcare center. Environmental Humanities, 7, 151–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Payne, P., & Wattchow, B. (2009). Phenomenological deconstruction, slow pedagogy, and the corporeal turn in wild environmental/outdoor education. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 14(1), 15–32.Google Scholar
  42. Pontius, J., Greenwood, D., Ryan, J., & Greenwood, E. (2013). Hunting for ecological learning. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 18, 80–95.Google Scholar
  43. Plumwood, V. (1999). Being prey. In D. Rothenberg & M. Ulvaeus (Eds.), The new earth reader: The best of Terra Nova (pp. 76–92). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  44. Rakestraw, M. (2013). Whom do you pet and whom do you eat? [lesson plan]. Surry, ME: Institute for Humane Education.Google Scholar
  45. Richards, R. (2011). “I could have told you that wouldn’t work”: Cyberfeminist pedagogy in action. Feminist Teacher, 22(1), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rice, S. (2017). What’s meat got to do with it? Some considerations for ecologizing education with respect to diet. Educational Theory, 67(4), 471–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Robinson, M. (2014). Animal personhood in Mi’kmaq perspective. Societies, 4, 672–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rowe, B. (2016). Challenging anthropocentrism in education: Posthumanist intersectionality and eating animals as gastro-aesthetic pedagogy. In S. Rice & A. G. Rud (Eds.), The educational significance of human and non-human animal interactions (pp. 31–49). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  49. Rowe, B., & Rocha, S. (2015). School lunch is not a meal: Posthuman eating as folk phenomenology. Educational Studies, 51(6), 482–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Russell, C. (2005). “Whoever does not write is written”: The role of “nature” in post-post approaches to environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 11(5), 433–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Russell, C. (2006). Working across and with methodological difference in environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 12(3/4), 403–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Russell, C., & Oakley, J. (2016). Engaging the emotional dimensions of environmental education. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 21, 13–22.Google Scholar
  53. Russell, C., & Semenko, K. (2016). We take “cow” as a compliment: Fattening humane, environmental, and social justice education. In E. Cameron & C. Russell (Eds.), The fat pedagogy reader: Challenging weight-based oppression through critical education (pp. 211–220). New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  54. Russell, J. (2017). “Everything has to die one day”: Children’s explorations of the meanings of death in human-animal-nature relationships. Environmental Education Research, 23(1), 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Selby, D. (1995). Earthkind: A teachers’ handbook on humane education. Oakhill, UK: Trentham.Google Scholar
  56. Smith, H., Dyment, J., Hill, A., & Downing, J. (2016). “You want us to teach outdoor education where?” Reflections on teaching outdoor education online. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 16(4), 303–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Spannring, R. (2017). Animals in environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 23(1), 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Taylor, A., & Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2015). Learning with children, ants, and worms in the Anthropocene: Towards a common world pedagogy of multispecies vulnerability. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 23(4), 507–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vegan Talk. (2015). Putting animals in their place [video]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qwm3l_pXImo&feature=youtu.be
  60. Weil, Z. (2007). Humane education. In M. Bekoff (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human-animal relationships (pp. 675–678). Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationLakehead UniversityThunder BayCanada

Personalised recommendations