Advertisement

Need and Opportunity: Addressing Diverse Stakeholders and Power in the Conflict over Toolangi State Forest, Victoria, Australia

  • Lisa de KleynEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The Politics of Intersectionality book series (POLI)

Abstract

Conflicts over the management and use of native forests in Australia have been defined as “acrimonious and intractable” (Dargavel, 1998, 25). The conflict over Toolangi State Forest, Victoria, is iconic of forest conflicts and remains unresolved. The conflict is heightening as the forest ecosystem and species are endangered, the native forestry industry is threatened due to reduced supply, and activism to protect the forest responds to changing situations and contexts. In the background, there are diverse stakeholders who feel unrecognised and excluded from decision-making. Contemporary politics and policy processes have been described as adversarial (Nelson and Pettit 2004) and warrant analysis from new perspectives to provide insight into the conflict and recommendations for improvement in policy processes that would recognise diverse stakeholders (including the environment), engender procedural justice, and achieve just outcomes for all. Environmental justice provides a framework for analysing conflict and associated resolution processes through its principle concerns of distributive, procedural, and recognition justice. However, recognition justice has been described as under-theorised (Schlosberg 2004), and intersectional feminism is used in this analysis to enhance the concept of recognition. With their combined focus on justice, recognition, power, knowledge, and change from the bottom-up, environmental justice and intersectional feminism present strong frameworks for analysing conflict and policy related to native forests and natural resource management.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thank you to Associate Professor Anitra Nelson, Associate Professor Wendy Steele, and Professor Jean Hillier for reviewing drafts of this chapter. This work has been supported by a Victorian Environmental Assessment Council Student Scholarship 2016 and an Australian Research Council Discovery Project (DP150100299), led by RMIT University, Centre for Urban Research in partnership with Griffith University, Macquarie University, and Curtin University.

References

  1. Ajani, J. (2007). The Forest Wars. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ajani, J. (2011). Australia’s Wood and Wood Products Industry Situation and Outlook, Working Paper. Online. Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University. Retrieved October 12, 2016, from http://tasmaniantimes.com/images/uploads/Ajani_(2011)_Australian_forestry_industry_-_situation_and_outlook.pdf.
  3. Ananda, J., & Herath, G. (2003). Incorporating Stakeholder Values into Regional Forest Planning: A Value Function Approach. Ecological Economics, 45(1), 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, T. (2003). Wombat Community Forest Management. In Proceedings of the Community Forestry Forum, 25–26 October 2003, Creswick, Victoria.Google Scholar
  5. Arcioni, E., & Mitchell, G. (2005). Environmental Justice in Australia: When the RATS Became IRATE. Environmental Politics, 14(3), 363–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barkin, D., & Fuente, M. (2013). Community Forest Management: Can the Green Economy Contribute to Environmental Justice? Natural Resources Forum, 37, 200–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bell, K. (2014). Achieving Environmental Justice: A Cross-National Analysis. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bird Rose, D. (1999). Indigenous Ecologies and an Ethic of Connection. In N. Low (Ed.), Global Ethics & Environment. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
  9. Brehm, H. N., & Pellow, D. N. (2013). Pollution, Poverty, and Marginalized Communities. In Routledge Handbook of Global Environmental Politics (pp. 308–320). Florence: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  10. Buckingham, S., & Kulcur, R. (2010). Gendered Geographies of Environmental Justice. In R. Holifield, M. Porter, & G. Walker (Eds.), Spaces of Environmental Justice. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
  11. Bullard, R. D. (2000). Dumping in Dixie. Race, Class, and Environmental Quality. Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  12. Burns, E. L., Lindenmayer, D. B., Stein, J., Blanchard, W., McBurney, L., Blair, D., & Banks, S. C. (2015). Ecosystem Assessment of Mountain Ash Forest in the Central Highlands of Victoria, South-Eastern Australia. Austral Ecology, 40(4), 386–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coakes, S. (1998). Valuing the Social Dimension: Social Assessment in the Regional Forest Agreement Process. Australian Journal of Environmental Management, 5(1), 47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Commonwealth of Australia. (2016). National Recovery Plan for Leadbeater’s possum (Gymnobelideus leadbeateri), Commonwealth of Australia 2016. Online. Retrieved April 7, 2017, from http://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/6e2618ee-b799-4505-ac96-b3b3e0eb99c4/files/draft-national-recovery-plan-leadbeaters-possum.pdf.
  15. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140, 139–167.Google Scholar
  16. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 1241–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dargavel, J. (1998). Politics, Policy and Process in the Forests. Australian Journal of Environmental Management, 5(1), 25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Derickson, K. D., & MacKinnon, D. (2015). Toward an Interim Politics of Resourcefulness for the Anthropocene. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(2), 304–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Di Chiro, G. (2008). Living Environmentalisms: Coalition Politics, Social Reproduction, and Environmental Justice. Environmental Politics, 17(2), 276–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dryzek, J. (2005). The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Environment Defenders Office. (2012). Environmental Justice Project. Final Report, Environment Defenders Office (Victoria). Online. Retrieved December 20, 2014, from envirojustice.org.au/downloads/files/law_reform/edo_vic_environmental_justice_report.pdf.
  22. Feary, S. (2005). Indigenous Australians and Forests. In J. Dargavel (Ed.), Australia and New Zealand Forest Histories (pp. 9–16). Kingston: Australian Forest History Society Inc. Occasional Publications, No. 1.Google Scholar
  23. Feary, S., Kanowski, P., Altman, J., & Baker, R. (2010). Managing Forest Country: Aboriginal Australians and the Forest Sector. Australian Forestry, 73(2), 126–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fincher, R., & Iveson, K. (2012). Justice and Injustice in the City. Geographical Research, 50(3), 231–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gordon, J. (2014). State Labor Dumps Great Forests Park Plan Ahead of Victorian Election. The Age. Website [Online]. Retrieved October 13, 2016, from http://www.smh.com.au/environment/conservation/state-labor-dumps-great-forests-park-plan-ahead-of-victorian-election-20141114-11n243.html.
  26. Gordon, J. (2016). Is Victoria’s Native Forestry Industry Worth It at $5 Million a Job? The Age. Website [Online]. Retrieved October 12, 2016, from http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/is-victorias-native-forestry-industry-worth-it-at-5-million-a-job-20160623-gpqcui.html.
  27. Grace, D. (2013). Intersectional Analysis at the Medico-Legal Borderland: HIV Testing Innovations and the Criminalization of HIV Non-Disclosure. In A. Wilson (Ed.), Situating Intersectionality. Politics, Policy and Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Gross, C. (2007). Community Perspectives of Wind Energy in Australia: The Application of a Justice and Community Fairness Framework to Increase Social Acceptance. Energy Policy, 35, 2727–2736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gross, C. (2014). Fairness and Justice in Environmental Decision-Making: Water under the Bridge. London: Taylor & Francis Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hankivsky, O. (2012). An Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis Framework. Vancouver: Institute for Intersectionality Research and Policy, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
  31. Haugen, K. (2016). Contested Lands? Dissonance and Common Ground in Stakeholder Views of Forest Values. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 107(4), 421–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Holifield, R., Porter, M., & Walker, G. (2010). Spaces of Environmental Justice. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jessup, B. (2015). Justice, Recognition and Environmental Law: The Weilangta Forest Conflict Tasmania, Australia. University of Tasmania Law Review, 5, 5–33.Google Scholar
  34. Kanowski, P. J. (2017). Australia’s Forests: Contested Past, Tenure-Driven Present, Uncertain Future. Forest Policy and Economics, 77, 56–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Keith, H., Mackey, B. G., & Lindenmayer, D. (2009). Re-Evaluation of Forest Biomass Carbon Stocks and Lessons from the World’s Most Carbon-Dense Forests. PNAS, 106(28), 11635–11640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lawyers for Forests. (2014). New Laws Applying to Forest Activists in Victoria 2014 Fact Sheet. Lawyers for Forests. Website [Online]. Retrieved October 3, 2016, from http://www.lawyersforforests.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2014-Legal-Factsheet-for-Forest-Activists-in-Vic.pdf.
  37. Lee, J.-A. (2007). Gender, Ethnicity, and Hybrid Forms of Community-Based Urban Activism in Vancouver, 1957–1978: The Strathcona Story Revisited. Gender, Place & Culture, 14(4), 381–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lindenmayer, D. B. (1996). Wildlife and Woodchips. Leadbeater’s Possum a Test Case for Sustainable Forestry. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar
  39. Lindenmayer, D. B., Cunningham, R. B., Tanton, M. T., & Smith, A. P. (1990). The Conservation of Arboreal Marsupials in the Montane Ash Forests of the Central Highlands of Victoria, South East Australia: I. Factors Influencing the Occupancy of Trees with Hollows. Biological Conservation, 54, 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lindenmayer, D. B., Cunningham, R. B., Donnelly, C. F., & Franklin, J. F. (2000). Structural Features of Old-Growth Australian Montane Ash Forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 134, 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lindenmayer, D. B., Blanchard, W., McBurney, L., Blair, D., Banks, S. C., Driscoll, D., Smith, A. L., & Gill, A. M. (2013). Fire Severity and Landscape Context Effects on Arboreal Marsupials. Biological Conservation, 167, 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Livingston, K. (2013). International Adoption as Humanitarian Aid: The Discursive and Material Production of the “Social Orphan” in Haitian Disaster Relief. In A. R. Wilson (Ed.), Situating Intersectionality. Politics, Policy, and Power (pp. 11–42). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  43. MacFarlane, M., Smith, J., & Lowe, K. (1997). Leadbeater’s Possum (Gymnobelideus leadbeateri) Recovery Plan. Online. Retrieved October 3, 2016, from http://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/32bd48e9-293f-4757-bd02-1b174bddc467/files/leadbeaters-possum.pdf.
  44. Mansfield, B., Biermann, C., McSweeney, K., Law, J., Gallemore, C., Horner, L., & Munroe, D. K. (2015). Environmental Politics after Nature: Conflicting Socioecological Futures. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(2), 284–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Martinez-Alier, J., Anguelovski, I., Bond, P., Del Bene, D., Demaria, F., Gerber, J.-F., Greyl, L., Haas, W., Healy, H., Marín-Burgos, V., Ojo, G., Porto, M., Rijnhout, L., Rodríguez-Labajos, B., Spangenberg, J., Temper, L., Warlenius, R., & Yánez, I. (2014). Between Activism and Science: Grassroots Concepts for Sustainability Coined by Environmental Justice Organizations. Journal of Political Ecology, 21, 19–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Millner, F. (2011). Access to Environmental Justice [Online]. Deakin Law Review, 16(1), 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nadeau, R. L. (2006). A Green Thumb on the Invisible Hand. Environmental Economics and Ecological Economics. In The Environmental Endgame: Mainstream Economics, Ecological Disaster, and Human Survival. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press New.Google Scholar
  48. Nelson, A., & Pettit, C. (2004). Effective Community Engagement for Sustainability: Wombat Community Forest Management Case Study. Australian Geographer, 35(3), 301–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Osborne, N. (2015). Intersectionality and Kyriarchy: A Framework for Approaching Power and Social Justice in Planning and Climate Change Adaptation. Planning Theory, 14(May), 130–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rees, S. (2014). A New National Park. Interaction, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 8–12. Online. ISSN: 0310-7949. Retrieved March 17, 2015, from http://search.informit.com.au.ezproxy.lib.rmit.edu.au/documentSummary;dn=776222132814300;res=IELHSS.
  51. Schlosberg, D. (2004). Reconceiving Environmental Justice: Global Movements and Political Theories. Environmental Politics, 13(3), 517–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schlosberg, D. (2007). Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Smooth, W. (2013). Intersectionality from Theoretical Framework to Policy Intervention. In A. R. Wilson (Ed.), Intersectionality. Politics, Policy, and Power (pp. 11–42). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  54. Spelman, E. V. (1988). Inessential Woman. Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought. London: The Women’s Press Limited.Google Scholar
  55. Steele, W., Maccallum, D., Byrne, J., & Houston, D. (2012). Planning the Climate-Just City. International Planning Studies, 17(1), 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sweeney, O. (2016). Regional Forest Agreements: Nice Idea, Total Failure. Park Watch, 265, 8–9.Google Scholar
  57. Syme, G. J., Nancarrow, B. E., & McCreddin, J. A. (1999). Defining the Components of Fairness in the Allocation of Water to Environmental and Human Uses. Journal of Environmental Management, 57(1), 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Taungurung Clans Aboriginal Corporation. (2017). Culture. Taungurung Clans. Website [Online]. Retrieved April 3, 2017, from http://taungurung.com.au/culture/.
  59. Taylor, D. E. (1997). Women of Color, Environmental Justice, and Ecofeminism. In K. Warren & N. Erkal (Eds.), Ecofeminism: Women, Culture, Nature (pp. 38–81). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Taylor, C., McCarthy, M. A., & Lindenmayer, D. B. (2014). Nonlinear Effects of Stand Age on Fire Severity. Conservation Letters, 7, 355–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Townsend-Bell, E. E. (2013). Intersectional Advances? Inclusionary and Intersectional State Action in Uruguay. In A. R. Wilson (Ed.), Intersectionality. Politics, Policy, and Power (pp. 43–62). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  62. Verloo, M. (2009). Multiple Inequalities, Intersectionality and the European Union. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(3), 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vertessy, R. A., Watson, F. G. R., & O’Sullivan, S. K. (2001). Factors Determining Relations between Stand Age and Catchment Water Balance in Mountain Ash Forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 143, 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. VicForests. (2017). Tree Species Profiles. VicForests. Website [Online]. Retrieved March 1, 2017, from http://www.vicforests.com.au/supplying-our-industry-1/plantations-and-native-forest/introduction.
  65. Viggers, J. I., Weaver, H. J., & Lindenmayer, D. B. (2013). Melbourne’s Water Catchments. Perspectives on a World Class Water Supply. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
  66. Walker, G. (2012). Environmental Justice: Concepts, Evidence and Politics. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Warren, K. (1999). Care-Sensitive Ethics and Situated Universalism. In N. Low (Ed.), Global Ethics & Environment. Routledge: London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Urban ResearchRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations