Advertisement

Bringing Intersectionality into Danish Public Policy

  • Heidi Lene Myglegaard AndersenEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The Politics of Intersectionality book series (POLI)

Abstract

This chapter applies an intersectional analysis to a community health framework based partly on phronetic action research and partly on a Foucauldian-inspired planning approach based on phronetic social science. The empirical case study describes a local planning process of a health project in a deprived community in Copenhagen, Denmark. Denmark can be seen as a pragmatic case example, as it is experiencing a growing inequality in health despite being based in a universal welfare state. The aim of the analysis is to find alternative theoretical and practical solutions to the current public health policies. The conclusion is that one alternative to the Danish national health documents is a cross-sectional community health approach based on phronetic action research. Intersectional-Based Policy Analysis (IBPA) is another. IBPA applied to the case study has transcended the prevailing conceptualization of class, widened the perception of how it is possible to (re)think health, and has addressed some of the root causes to inequality in health. The case study elaborates that the Danish national health strategies instead of being oriented on general indicators should be orientated towards the actual conditions and contextual health needs and perceptions.

References

  1. Aamann, I. C. (2016). Klasse, Sundhed og Subjekt—Nye Greb om Social Ulighed i Sundhed. In S. Lehn-Christiansen, A. Liveng, B. Dybbroe, M. Holen, N. Thualagant, I. C. Aamann, & B. Nordenhof (Eds.), Ulighed i Sundhed—Nye Humanistiske og Samfundsvidenskabelige Perspektiver (1st ed., pp. 77–97). Frederiksberg, Denmark: Frydenlund Academic.Google Scholar
  2. Aamann, I. C. (2017). “Oh! Ibens Here Now, So We Better Behave Properly”—The Production of Class as Morality in Research Encounters. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 18(3).  https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-18.3.2752.
  3. Almlund, P., & Holm, J. (2015). Post Rio Communication Styles for Deliberation: Between Individualization and Collective Action. The Conference on Communication and Environment.Google Scholar
  4. Amdam, R. (2010). Empowerment Planning in Regional Development. European Planning Studies, 18(11). Abingdon: Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd: 1805–1819.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2010.512165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andersen, H. L. (2015a). Community Health—Sundhedsfremmestrategier og planlægning i lokalsamfund. Købehavn: Roskilde Universitet. Retrieved from http://rudar.ruc.dk/handle/1800/27071.Google Scholar
  6. Andersen, H. L. (2015b). Social Health and Sustainability—What Conceptual Framing and Common Language Can Help Move a Shared Agenda Forward? The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies, 14(2), 65–75. Retrieved from http://www.journal-tes.dk/.Google Scholar
  7. Aristoteles. (2000). Etikken. In S. Porsborg (Ed.) (5th ed.). Frederiksberg, Denmark: Det lille Forlag.Google Scholar
  8. Bourdieu, P. (1987). What Makes a Social Class? On the Theoretical and Practical Existence of Groups. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 32, 1–17.Google Scholar
  9. Brøgger, B., & Eikeland, O. (2009). Turning to Practice with Action Research (György Széll et al., Ed., vol. 15). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
  10. Brønnum-Hansen, H., & Diderichsen, F. (2013). Fuglekvarteret i tal. Københavns Kommune, 1–17.Google Scholar
  11. Brønnum-Hansen, H., Holm, A. L., Schnohr, C. W., & Diderichsen, F. (2013). Flere sunde leveår på Nørrebro og i Bispebjerg: Hvilke udfordringer er der? Københavs Universitet. Det Sundhedsvidenskabelige Fakultet, 1. Afdeling for Social Medicin, Institut for Folkesun.Google Scholar
  12. Clegg, S., Flyvbjerg, B., & Haugaard, M. (2014). Reflections on Phronetic Social Science: A Dialogue Between Stewart Clegg, Bent Flyvbjerg and Mark Haugaard. Journal of Political Power, July 2014(juni), 1–32.  https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2014.929259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Craig, G. (2005). Community Capacity-Building: Definitions, Scope, Measurements and Critiques. A Paper Prepared for the OECD, Prague, Czech Republic December 8, 2005. 1: Introduction: the Nature of ‘Community’.Google Scholar
  14. Dean, K., & Mcqueen, D. (1996). Theory in Health Promotion Introduction. Health Promotion International, 11(1), 7–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diderichsen, F., Scheele, C. E., & Little, I. G. (2015). Tackling Health Inequalities Locally: The Scandinavian Experience. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  16. Dybbroe, L., Land, B., & Nielsen, S. B. (2012). Sundhedsfremme: Et kritisk perspektiv. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
  17. Eikeland, O. (2006a). Book Review Sanford F. Schram, Brian Caterino (Eds.) (2006): Making Political Science Matter—Debating Knowledge, Research, and Method Reviewed by Olav Eikeland (Vol. 4, pp. 314–319). New York; London: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Eikeland, O. (2006b). Phrónêsis, Aristotle, and Action Research. International Journal of Action Research, 2(1), 5.Google Scholar
  19. Eikeland, O. (2007). From Epistemology to Gnoseology – Understanding the Knowledge Claims of Action Research. Management Research News, 30(5), 344–358.  https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170710746346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eikeland, O. (2008). The Ways of Aristotle. Aristotelian Phrónêsis, Aristotelian Philosophy of Dialogue, and Action Research Reviewed by Ole Fogh Kirkeby.Google Scholar
  21. Eikeland, O. (2012). Intervention Research, Collaborative Praxis Research? International Journal of Action Research, 8(1), 9–44. https://doi.org/10.1688/1861-9916.
  22. Eikeland, O. (2014). Phronesis. In D. Coglan & M. Brydon-Miller (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Action Research (pp. 623–626). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  23. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Faber, S. T., & Prieur, A. (2013). Class in Disguise: On Representations of Class in a Presumptively Classless Society. In L. Knudsen, M. H. Jacobsen, & L. Skov (Eds.). Henriksen. Institut for Sociologi, Socialt Arbejde og Organisation, Aalborg Universitet (Sociologisk Arbejdspapir). Aalborg, Denmark: Aalborg Universitet. Retrieved from http://vbn.aau.dk/en/publications/class-in-disguise(83ea8fc6-01a7-4b3f-be91-6acfa86666d6).html.
  25. Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again (1st ed.). Cambridge: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Flyvbjerg, B. (2002). Phronetic Planning Research. Theoretical and Methodological Reflections Draft 7.0. Aalborg University, Denmark. Electronic Copy. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2278320.
  28. Flyvbjerg, B. (2004). Phronetic Planning Research: Theoretical and Methodological Reflections. Planning Theory Practice, 5(3), 283–306.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935042000250195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Flyvbjerg, B. (2007a). Megaproject policy and planning : Problems, causes, cures = Megaprojekters politik og planlægning: Problemer, årsager, løsninger: Sammenfattende redegørelse for doktorafhandling af Bent Flyvbjerg. Aalborg: Aalborg Universitet.Google Scholar
  30. Flyvbjerg, B. (2007b). Phronetic Organizational Research. For The Senate Sub-Committee on Population Health, Appendix B.Google Scholar
  31. Flyvbjerg, B. (2009). Samfundsvidenskab som virker. Hvorfor samfundsforskningen fejler, og hvordan man får den til at lykkedes igen. Cambridge University Press 2001 i engelsk udgave. Akademisk Forlag i dansk udgave 2009.Google Scholar
  32. Flyvbjerg, B. (2011). Case Study. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (4th ed., Chapter 17, pp. 1–3, 301–316). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Flyvbjerg, B. (2012). Real Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Flyvbjerg, B., & Sampson, S. (2001). Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Flyvbjerg, B., Landman, T., & Schram, S. (2013). Tension Points in Real Social Science: A Response. British Journal of Sociology, 64(4), 758–762.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12047_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fosse, E. (2011). Different Welfare States-Different Policies? An Analysis of the Substance of National Health Promotion Policies in Three European Countries. International Journal of Health Services, 41(2), 255–272.  https://doi.org/10.2190/HS.41.2.e.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Haavind, H. (2003). Masculinity by Rule-Breaking: Cultural Contestations in the Transitional Move from Being a Child to Being a Young Male. NORA, 2, 89–100.Google Scholar
  38. Hancock, T. (1999). Health Care Reform and Reform for Health: Creating a Health System for Communities in the 21st Century. Futures, 31(5), 417–436.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(99)00003-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hancock, T. (2009). Act Locally: Community-Based Population Health Promotion. Appendix B. A Report for The Senate Sub-Committee on Population Health, March, 1–81. Retrieved from http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/SEN/Committee/402/popu/rep/appendixBjun09-e.pdf.Google Scholar
  40. Hankivsky, O. (2012). An Intersectionality-Based Edited by Olena Hankivsky. Institute for Intersectionality Research and Policy, Simon Fraser University. Retrieved from www.sfu.ca/iirp/ibpa.html.
  41. Jones, K. C., Misra, J., & Mccurley, K. (2010). Intersectionality in Sociology, 1–8.Google Scholar
  42. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2014). Critical Participatory Action Research. In D. Coglan & M. Brydon-Miller (Eds.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Action Research (pp. 208–211). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  43. Kickbusch, I. (2012). 21st Century Determinants of Health and Wellbeing: A New Challenge for Health Promotion. Global Health Promotion, 19(3), 5–7.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1757975912454783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kickbusch, I., & Gleicher, D. (2012). Governance for Health in the 21st Century. WHO Europe.Google Scholar
  45. Labonté, R. (2011). Toward a Post-Charter Health Promotion. Health Promotion International, 26 Suppl 2(December), ii183–ii186.  https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dar062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Marmot, M. (2015). The Health Gap: The Challenge of an Unequal World. In A. Johnson (Ed.). Bloomsbury Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/the-health-gap-9781408857991/#sthash.CtVuvKLD.dpuf.
  47. McQueen, D. V., Wismar, M., Lin, V., Jones, C. M., & Davies, M. (2012a). Intersectoral Governance for Health in All Policies. Structures, Actions and Experiences. World Health Organisation, XIX+206p.Google Scholar
  48. McQueen, D. V., Kickbusch, I., Potvin, L., Pelikan, J. M., Balbo, L., & Abel, T. (2012b). Health and Modernity—The Role of Theory in Health Promotion. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-37759-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mørch, Y., & Staunæs, D. (2003). Introduction: Gender and Ethnicity. NORA, 2, 67–68.Google Scholar
  50. Povlsen, L., Karlsson, L. E., Regber, S., Sandstig, G., & Fosse, E. (2014). Are Equity Aspects Communicated in Nordic Public Health Documents? Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 42(December 2013), 235–241.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494813520358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Raphael, D. (2014). Challenges to Promoting Health in the Modern Welfare State: The Case of the Nordic Nations. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 42(1), 7–17.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494813506522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reay, D. (1997). Feminist Theory, Habitus, and Social Class: Disrupting Notions of Classlessness. Women’s Studies International Forum, 20(2), 225–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Reay, D. (2002). Shaun’s Story. Gender and Education, 14(2), 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Reay, D. (2005). Beyond Consciousness?: The Psychic Landscape of Social Class. Sociology, 39(5), 911–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sandercock, L. (2012). Unsettling a Settler Society: Film, Phronesis and Collaborative Planning in Small-Town Canada. In S. Flyvbjerg, B. Landman, & T. Schram (Eds.), Real Social Science: Applied Phronesis (1st ed., pp. 137–166). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sennett, R., & Cobb, J. (1973). The Hidden Injuries of Class. In A. A. Knopf (Ed.). New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
  57. Skeggs, B. (1997). Formations of Class and Gender. Becoming Respectable. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  58. Skeggs, B. (2004). Class, Self, Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  59. Vallgårda, S. (2008). Social Inequality in Health: Dichotomy or Gradient? A Comparative Study of Problematizations in National Public Health Programmes. Health Policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 85(1), 71–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.07.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vallgårda, S. (2010). Tackling Social Inequalities in Health in the Nordic Countries: Targeting a Residuum or the Whole Population? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 64(6), 495–496.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2009.102459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vallgårda, S. (2011). Addressing Individual Behaviours and Living Conditions: Four Nordic Public Health Policies. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 39(6 Suppl), 6–10.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494810378922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Verity, F. (2007). Community Capacity Building—A Review of the Literature. Government of South Australia, 38.Google Scholar
  63. WHO. (1986). Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion, 1–5. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/healthpromotion/conferences/previous/ottawa/en/.
  64. WHO. (2015). Health in the Post-2015 Development Agenda, July 2013.Google Scholar
  65. Woodall, J., South, J., & Warwick-Booth, L. (2010). Empowerment and Health & Well-Being Evidence Review.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University College AbsalonRoskildeDenmark

Personalised recommendations