Advertisement

Intersectionality and Indigenous Peoples in Australia: Experiences with Engagement in Native Title and Mining

  • Natalie OsborneEmail author
  • Catherine Howlett
  • Deanna Grant-Smith
Chapter
Part of the The Politics of Intersectionality book series (POLI)

Abstract

The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples of Australia are culturally diverse, with varied experiences of colonisation. However, policy and planning processes often treat Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples as a homogenised bloc, erasing differences of opinion, values, politics, and experiences and avoiding analysis of internal power dynamics. There is also a tendency for non-Indigenous policymakers to conflate ‘Indigenous’ with ‘environmental’ interests and values. Thus, despite often good intentions, consultation and engagement processes with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples generally fail to adopt an intersectional approach and in turn not only often fail in their stated goal of inclusivity but may exacerbate existing conflicts within a particular group and unintentionally reproduce inequities. In this chapter, the authors outline an understanding of intersectionality as informed by Aboriginal women and bring together insights from two Australian case studies to explore some of the problems that emerge from a failure to adopt an intersectional lens when engaging with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples. They consider multiple and co-constituting axes of power with a focus on the relationships between colonisation, kyriarchy, and the lived experiences of Indigenous Peoples and outline considerations for operationalising intersectionality, particularly in the context of Native Title.

References

  1. Altman, J. (2012). Indigenous Rights, Mining Corporations, and the Australian State. In S. Sawyer & E. T. Gomez (Eds.), The Politics of Resource Extraction: Indigenous Peoples, Multinational Corporations, and the State (pp. 46–74). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.  https://doi.org/10.1057/97802303687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bains, R. (2013). Opportunities for First Nations Prosperity Through Oil and Gas Development. Vancouver, BC: Centre for Aboriginal Policy Studies, Fraser Institute.Google Scholar
  3. Behrendt, L. (1993). Aboriginal Women and the White Lies of the Feminist Movement: Implications for Aboriginal Women in Rights Discourse. Australian Feminist Law Journal, 1(1), 27–44.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.1993.11077108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buczko, M. (2016). Six Things You Need to Know About Intersectionality. Retrieved February 14, 2017, from http://mcwh.com.au/mcwh-news/?p=1082.
  5. Burnside, S. (2012). Outcomes for All? Overlapping Claims and Intra Indigenous Conflict Under the Native Title Act. Australian Indigenous Law Review, 16(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  6. Cameron, J., & Grant-Smith, D. (2005). Building Citizens: Participatory Planning Practice and a Transformative Politics of Difference. Urban Policy and Research, 23(1), 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carter, J. (2010). Protocols, Particularities, and Problematising Indigenous ‘Engagement’ in Community-Based Environmental Management in Settled Australia. The Geographical Journal, 176(3), 199–213.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4959.2010.00355.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark, N. (2012). Perseverance, Determination, and Resistance: An Indigenous Intersectional-Based Policy Analysis of Violence in the Lives of Indigenous Girls. In O. Hankivsky (Ed.), An Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis Framework (pp. 133–158). Vancouver, BC: Institute for Intersectionality Research and Policy, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
  9. Conifer, D. (2017, February 13). Native Title: Federal Government Moves to Change Act After Court Ruling. ABC News (online). Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-02-13/government-moves-to-change-native-title-act/8266108.
  10. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Delegates at the Referendum Convention at Uluru. (2017). The Uluru Statement from the Heart. 1 Voice Uluru (online). Retrieved from https://www.1voiceuluru.org/the-statement/.
  12. Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. (2016). Closing the Gap: Prime Minister’s Report 2016. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  13. Fforde, C., Bamblett, L., Lovett, R., Gorringe, S., & Fogarty, B. (2013). Discourse, Deficit and Identity: Aboriginality, the Race Paradigm and the Language of Representation in Contemporary Australia. Media International Australia, 149, 162–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fincher, R., & Iveson, K. (2008). Planning and Diversity in the City: Redistribution, Recognition and Encounter. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fournier, T. (2005). Preface. In B. Hocking (Ed.), Unfinished Constitutional Business? Rethinking Indigenous Self-determination (pp. vii–vix). Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gordon, S. (2017). Indigenous Recognition: Turnbull Government’s Rejection of Uluru Statement from the Heart Indefensible. ABC News (online). Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-10-27/decision-to-reject-uluru-statement-is-indefensible/9093408.
  17. Government of Australia. (1983). Native Title Act. Office of Legislative Drafting.Google Scholar
  18. Hankivsky, O. (Ed.). (2012). An Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis Framework. Vancouver, BC: Institute for Intersectionality Research and Policy, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
  19. Harris, M. (2013). Emergent Indigenous Identities: Rejecting the Need for Purity. In M. Harris, M. Nakata, & B. Carlson (Eds.), The Politics of Identity: Emerging Indigeneity (pp. 10–26). Sydney, Australia: UTS e-Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hickey, S. D. (2015). ‘They Say I’m Not a Typical Blackfella’: Experiences of Racism and Ontological Insecurity in Urban Australia. Journal of Sociology, 52(4), 725–740.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783315581218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Howden, S. (2012, December 8). Plan to Explore for Gas Under 40% of the State. The Sydney Morning Herald, 1. https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/plan-to-explore-for-gas-under-40-percent-of-state-20121207-2b11e.html.
  22. Howitt, R., & McLean, J. (2015). Towards Closure? Coexistence, Remoteness and Righteousness in Indigenous Policy in Australia. Australian Geographer, 46(2), 137–145.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00049182.2015.1020992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Howlett, C., & Shaw, L. (2017). The Friction of Fracking: Discursive Constraints on Aboriginal Participation in Coal Seam Gas in Northern NSW. The Extractive Industries & Society, 4(2), 329–336.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2017.01.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Igoe, J. (2008). Global Indigenism and Spaceship Earth: Convergence, Space, and Re-entry Friction. In J. Oostoek & B. K. Gills (Eds.), The Globalization of Environmental Crisis (pp. 95–108). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Irazábal, C., & Huerta, C. (2016). Intersectionality and Planning at the Margins: LGBTQ Youth of Color in New York. Gender, Place & Culture, 23(5), 714–732.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2015.1058755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jackson, S., Porter, L., & Johnson, L. C. (2017). Planning in Indigenous Australia: From Imperial Foundations to Postcolonial Futures. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Langton, M. (2015). Maximising the Potential for Empowerment: The Sustainability of Indigenous Native Title Corporations. In S. Brennan, M. Davis, B. Edgeworth, & L. Terrill (Eds.), Native Title from Mabo to Akiba: A Vehicle for Change and Empowerment? (pp. 171–183). Leichhardt: Federation Press.Google Scholar
  28. Liddle, C. (2014). Intersectionality and Indigenous Feminism: An Aboriginal Woman’s Perspective. Retrieved February 14, 2017, from http://postcolonialist.com/civil-discourse/intersectionality-indigenous-feminism-aboriginal-womans-perspective/.
  29. Lucashenko, M., & Best, O. (1995). Women Bashing: An Urban Aboriginal Perspective. Social Alternatives, 14(1), 19–22.Google Scholar
  30. Macdonald, G. (1997). ‘Recognition and Justice’: The Traditional/Historical Contradiction in New South Wales. In D. E. Smith & J. Finlayson (Eds.), Fighting Over Country: Anthropological Perspectives (pp. 65–82). Canberra, ACT: Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, Australian National University.Google Scholar
  31. Macdonald, G. (2006). Adversarial Law and Native Title: How Legal Models Reconstitute Persons and Socialities. Dissent, 21, 39–48.Google Scholar
  32. Macdonald, G., & Bauman, T. (2011). Concepts, Hegemony, and Analysis: Unsettling Native Title Anthropology. In T. Bauman & G. Macdonald (Eds.), Unsettling Anthropology: The Demands of Native Title on Worn Concepts and Changing Lives (pp. 1–18). Canberra, ACT: Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies.Google Scholar
  33. Marchetti, E. (2008). Intersectional Race and Gender Analyses: Why Legal Processes Just Don’t Get It. Social and Legal Studies, 17(2), 155–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marland, S. (2012). The Need for Homelands: Living on Traditional, Ancestral Lands Is Critical for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples. Australian Quarterly, 83(3), 16–20.Google Scholar
  35. Martin, D. F. (2015). Does Native Title Merely Provide an Entitlement to Be Native? Indigenes, Identities, and Applied Anthropological Practice. The Australian Journal of Anthropology, 26(1), 112–127.  https://doi.org/10.1111/taja.12121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McQuire, A. (2018). Mainstream Feminism Still Blind to Its Racism. IndigenousX (online). Retrieved from https://indigenousx.com.au/amy-mcquire-mainstream-feminism-still-blind-to-its-racism/#.WvqnuoiFPIU.
  37. Moreton-Robinson, A. (2000). Talkin’ Up to the White Woman: Aboriginal Women and Feminism. Brisbane, Australia: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
  38. Moreton-Robinson, A. (2013). Towards an Australian Indigenous Women’s Standpoint Theory. Australian Feminist Studies, 28(78), 331–347.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2013.876664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Muir, K. (2012). Politics, Protest and Performativity: The Broome Community’s ‘No Gas on the Kimberley Coast’ Campaign. Australian Humanities Review, 53, 1–17.Google Scholar
  40. Mundine, W. (2011, September 9). Inquiry into Coal Seam Gas, NTSCORP Limited (Submission No. 0334). Retrieved from https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/committee.nsf/0/8cd836184a4a4f8cca25790d00259caf/$FILE/Submission%200334.pdf.
  41. National Native Title Tribunal. (2011). Quandamooka People’s Native Title Determinations. Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  42. Norman, H. R. (2015). ‘What Do We Want?’: A Political History of Aboriginal Land Rights in New South Wales. Canberra, ACT: Aboriginal Studies Press.Google Scholar
  43. O’Kane, M. (2013). Initial Report on the Independent Review of Coal Seam Gas Activities in NSW. Sydney: NSW Government.Google Scholar
  44. Osborne, N. (2014). Stories of Stradbroke: Emotional Geographies of an Island in Transition. (Doctor of Philosophy), Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
  45. Osborne, N. (2015). Intersectionality and Kyriarchy: A Framework for Approaching Power and Social Justice in Planning and Climate Change Adaptation. Planning Theory, 14(2), 130–151.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095213516443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pearson, L. (2017). What Is a Makarrata? The Yolngu Word Is More Than a Synonym for Treaty. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-08-10/makarrata-explainer-yolngu-word-more-than-synonym-for-treaty/8790452.
  47. Porter, L. (2014). Possessory Politics and the Conceit of Procedure: Exposing the Cost of Rights Under Conditions of dispossession. Planning Theory, 13(4), 387–406.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095214524569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Porter, L. (2016). Unlearning the Colonial Cultures of Planning. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Porter, L., & Barry, J. (2016). Planning for Coexistence? Recognizing Indigenous Rights Through Land-Use Planning in Canada and Australia. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Procter, A. (2016). Uranium and the Boundaries of Indigeneity in Nunatsiavut, Labrador. The Extractive Industries and Society, 3(2), 288–296.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pugliese, J. (2015). Geopolitics of Aboriginal Sovereignty: Colonial Law as ‘A Species of Excess of Its Own Authority’, Aboriginal Passport Ceremonies and Asylum Seekers. Law Text Culture, 19, 84–115.Google Scholar
  52. Ritter, D. (2009). Contesting Native Title. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  53. Schüssler Fiorenza, E. (1992). But She Said: Feminist Practices of Biblical Interpretation. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  54. Shaw, L. (2014). Governance of Aboriginal Access to Land: Native Title and Land Rights in New South Wales. A Case Study of Coal Seam Gas Development in Northern NSW (Honours thesis). Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
  55. Soldatic, K. (2015). Postcolonial Reproductions: Disability, Indigeneity and the Formation of the White Masculine Settler State of Australia. Social Identities, 21(1), 53–68.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2014.995352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Strelien, L. (2015). The Right to Resources and the Right to Trade. In S. Brennan, M. Davis, B. Edgeworth, & L. Terrill (Eds.), Native Title from Mabo to Akiba: A Vehicle for Change and Empowerment? (pp. 44–59). Leichhardt: Federation Press.Google Scholar
  57. Trigger, R., & Hamlyn, C. (2017, February 2). Noongar Native Title Agreement: $1.3b Deal Rejected by Federal Court. ABC News (online). Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-02-02/billon-dollar-noongar-native-title-deal-rejected-by-court/8235138.
  58. Trigger, D., Keenan, J., de Rijke, K., & Rifkin, W. (2014). Aboriginal Engagement and Agreement-Making with a Rapidly Developing Resource Industry: Coal Seam Gas Development in Australia. The Extractive Industries and Society, 1(2), 176–188.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2014.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vincent, E., & Neale, T. (2016). Unstable Relations: Indigenous People and Environmentalism in Contemporary Australia. Crawley: University of Western Australia Publishing.Google Scholar
  60. Walker, B. (2015). The Legal Shortcomings of Native Title. In S. Brennan, M. Davis, B. Edgeworth, & L. Terrill (Eds.), Native Title from Mabo to Akiba: A Vehicle for Change and Empowerment? (pp. 14–22). Leichhardt: Federation Press.Google Scholar
  61. Watson, I. (1998). Power of the Muldarbi: The Road to Its Demise. Australian Feminist Law Journal, 11(1), 28–45.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.1998.11077280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wheeler-Jones, C., Howlett, C., Seini, M., & Burns, G. L. (2015). Media Constructions of Aboriginality: Implications for Engagement with Coal Seam Gas Development in Australia. Australian Geographer, 46(2), 165–181.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00049182.2015.1020599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natalie Osborne
    • 1
    Email author
  • Catherine Howlett
    • 2
  • Deanna Grant-Smith
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Environment and ScienceGriffith UniversityBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Gnibi College of Indigenous Australian Peoples, Southern Cross UniversityLismoreAustralia
  3. 3.QUT Business School, Queensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations