Advertisement

Understanding Single Womanhood in China: An Intersectional Perspective

  • Crystal Li JiangEmail author
  • Wanqi Gong
Chapter
First Online:
  • 927 Downloads
Part of the The Politics of Intersectionality book series (POLI)

Abstract

Over the past few decades, the marriage rate has been decreasing across the globe and the populations of the singles have been rapidly increasing. Despite such significant changes, marriage norms remain strong throughout the world. Drawing on the intersectionality theory, this chapter presents an interlocking matrix of oppressions for single womanhood. Based on extensive literature review on single womanhood, the authors argue that multiple stigmas, including singlism, sexism, ageism, classism, as well as racism/ethnicity-based biases, all contribute to the negative experiences of single women across different cultural contexts. The oppressions occur on multiple levels, as results of the interaction across micro-, meso-, and macro-levels. The proposed matrix is later elaborated in the context of Chinese society to demonstrate its applicability. The chapter ends with a discussion of the potential to advance knowledge about gender inequity and to provide an informed framework for improving single womanhood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alstott, A. (2013). Updating the Welfare State: Marriage, the Income Tax, and Social Security in the Age of Individualism. Faculty Scholarship Series, 4867. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/4867.
  2. Armstrong, E. A., & Hamilton, L. T. (2013). Paying for the Party. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Attane, I. (2002). China’s Family Planning Policy: An Overview of Its Past and Future. Studies in Family Planning, 33(1), 103–113.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2002.00103.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrett, M., & Mcintosh, M. (1982). The Anti-social Family. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  5. Bay-Cheng, L. Y., & Goodkind, S. A. (2016). Sex and the Single (Neoliberal) Girl: Perspectives on Being Single Among Socioeconomically Diverse Young Women. Sex Roles, 74(5), 181–194.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0565-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berg-Cross, L., Scholz, A.-M., Long, J., Grzeszcyk, E., & Roy, A. (2013). Single Professional Women: A Global Phenomenon Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 5(5), 34–59.Google Scholar
  7. Bograd, M. (1999). Strengthening Domestic Violence Theories: Intersections of Race, Class, Sexual Orientation, and Gender. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 25(3), 275–289.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1999.tb00248.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bokek-Cohen, Y. (2016). ‘Marry a Camel, a Mouse or a Parakeet! The First Guy Who Passes You on the Street!’: Genderizing Marital Status by Othering Jewish Israeli Never-Married Women. Journal of Family Studies, 1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2016.1200116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Browne, I., & Misra, J. (2003). The Intersection of Gender and Race in the Labor Market. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 487–513.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bryne, A., & Carr, D. (2005). Commentaries On: Singles in Society and in Science. Psychological Inquiry, 16(2–3), 84–141.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2005.9682919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Charsley, K., & Liversage, A. (2015). Silenced Husbands: Muslim Marriage Migration and Masculinity. Men and Masculinities, 18(4), 489–508.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184x15575112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chasteen, A. L. (1994). “The World Around Me”: The Environment and Single Women. Sex Roles, 31(5/6), 20.  https://doi.org/10.1007/Bf01544591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cherlin, A. J. (2003). Should the Government Promote Marriage? Contexts, 2(4), 22–29.  https://doi.org/10.1525/ctx.2003.2.4.22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chiu, T. Y. (2016). Marriage Migration as a Multifaceted System: The Intersectionality of Intimate Partner Violence in Cross-Border Marriages. Violence Against Women.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216659940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Collins, P. H. (2000a). Black Feminist Thought – Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Collins, P. H. (2000b). Gender, Black Feminism, and Black Political Economy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 568(1), 41–53.  https://doi.org/10.1177/000271620056800105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Collins, K. (2007). From Mary to Carrie: 30 Years of Media Representations and Lived Experiences of Single Women. In K. Kolarova & V. Sokolova (Eds.), Gender and Generation (pp. 170–188). Prague: Literraria Pragensia.Google Scholar
  18. Collins, K. (2013). The Marginalized Majority: Media Representation and Lived Experiences of Single Women. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang International Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Conley, T. D., & Collins, B. E. (2002). Gender, Relationship Status, and Stereotyping About Sexual Risk. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(11), 1483–1494.  https://doi.org/10.1177/014616702237576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Davis, A. G., & Strong, P. M. (1977). Working Without a Net – Bachelor as a Social Problem. The Sociological Review, 25(1), 109–129.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1977.tb00281.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. DePaulo, B. M., & Morris, W. L. (2005). Singles in Society and in Science. Psychological Inquiry, 16(2–3), 57–83.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2005.9682918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. DePaulo, B. M., & Morris, W. L. (2006). The Unrecognized Stereotyping and Discrimination Against Singles. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 251–254.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00446.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dhamoon, R. K. (2011). Considerations on Mainstreaming Intersectionality. Political Research Quarterly, 64(1), 230–243.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912910379227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dumont, L. (1983). Affinity as a Value: Marriage Alliance in South India, with Comparative Essays in Australia. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  26. Elasmar, M., Hasegawa, K., & Brain, M. (1999). The Portrayal of Women in US Prime Time Television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43(1), 20–34.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159909364472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Flah, L. (2012, August 18). ‘Bayrat’ or ‘Spinsters’, Single Women Trapped in Social Stigma. Morocco World News. Retrieved from https://www.moroccoworldnews.com/2012/08/52406/bayrat-or-spinsters-single-women-trapped-in-social-stigma/.
  28. Fong, V. L. (2002). China’s One-Child Policy and the Empowerment of Urban Daughters. American Anthropologist, 1098–1109.  https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2002.104.4.1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fruzzetti, L. (1982). The Gift of a Virgin: Women, Marriage, and Ritual in a Bengali Society. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Gerstel, N., & Sarkisian, N. (2006). Marriage: The Good, the Bad, and the Greedy. Contexts, 5(4), 16–21.  https://doi.org/10.1525/ctx.2006.5.4.16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Giddens, A. (2000). Runaway World: How Globalization Is Reshaping Our Lives Family. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Gong, W., Tu, C., & Jiang, C. L. (2015). Stigmatized Presentation of Single Women: A Content Analysis of News Coverage on Single Women and Single Men in China. Journal of Gender Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2015.1095082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Greitemeyer, T. (2009). Stereotypes of Singles: Are Singles What We Think? European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(3), 368–383.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Guo, M., Aranda, M. P., & Silverstein, M. (2009). The Impact of Out-Migration on the Inter-Generational Support and Psychological Wellbeing of Older Adults in Rural China. Ageing and Society, 29(07), 1085–1104.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X0900871X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Halberstam, J. (2005). In a Queer Time and Place: Transgender Bodies, Subcultural Lives. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  36. Hankivsky, O., & Christoffersen, A. (2008). Intersectionality and the Determinants of Health: A Canadian Perspective. Critical Public Health, 18(3), 271–283.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09581590802294296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hankivsky, O., Grace, D., Hunting, G., & Ferlatte, O. (2012). Introduction: Why Intersectionality Matters for Health Equity and Policy Analysis. In O. Hankivsky (Ed.), An Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis Framework (pp. 7–23). Vancouver, BC: Institute for Intersectionality Research and Policy, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
  38. Hertel, J., Schütz, A., DePaulo, B. M., Morris, W. L., & Stucke, T. S. (2007). She’s Single, So What? How Are Singles Perceived Compared with People Who Are Married? Zeitschrift für Familienforschung-Journal of Family Research, 19(2), 139–158.Google Scholar
  39. Hume, J. (1997). Defining the Historic American Heroine: Changing Characteristics of Heroic Women in Nineteenth-Century Media. The Journal of Popular Culture, 31(1), 1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3840.1997.3101_1.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hume, J. (2000). Changing Characteristics of Heroic Women in Midcentury Mainstream Media. The Journal of Popular Culture, 34(1), 9–29.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3840.2000.3401_9.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jiang, L. C., & Gong, W. (2016). Counteracting Indirect Influence: The Responses of Single Chinese Women to Prejudicial Media Portrayals of Single Womanhood. Chinese Journal of Communication, 9(3), 215–231.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2016.1143852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jones, G. W. (2012). Population Policy in a Prosperous City-State: Dilemmas for Singapore. Population and Development Review, 38(2), 311–336.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2012.00494.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Joslin, C. G. (2013). Marriage, Biology, and Federal Benefits. Iowa Law Review, 98. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2181517.
  44. Krueger, J., Heckhausen, J., & Hundertmark, J. (1995). Perceiving Middle-Aged Adults – Effects of Stereotype-Congruent and Incongruent Information. Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 50(2), 82–93.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/50B.2.P82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lahad, K. (2013). “Am I Asking for Too Much?” The Selective Single Woman as a New Social Problem. Paper Presented at the Women’s Studies International Forum.Google Scholar
  46. Lesthaeghe, R. (2014). The Second Demographic Transition: A Concise Overview of Its Development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(51), 18112–18115.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1420441111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Li, L. (2015). If You Are the One: Dating Shows and Feminist Politics in Contemporary China. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(5), 519–535.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877914538906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Li, J., & Wang, X. (2017). Change of Family Planning Policy and Hazard of First Marriage – Data from CFPS 2010. Population Journal, 39, 18–27.  https://doi.org/10.16405/j.cnki.1004-129X.2017.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lichter, D. T., Batson, C. D., & Brown, J. B. (2004). Welfare Reform and Marriage Promotion: The Marital Expectations and Desires of Single and Cohabiting Mothers. Social Service Review, 78(1), 2–25.  https://doi.org/10.1086/380652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lindenbaum, S. (1981). Implications for Women of Changing Marriage Transactions in Bangladesh. Studies in Family Planning, 394–401.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1965996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Luo, W., & Sun, Z. (2014). Are You the One? China’s TV Dating Shows and the Sheng Nü’s Predicament. Feminist Media Studies, 1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2014.913648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Luo, W., & Sun, Z. (2015). Are You the One? China’s TV Dating Shows and the Sheng Nü’s Predicament. Feminist Media Studies, 15(2), 239–256.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2014.913648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Maeda, E., & Hecht, M. L. (2012). Identity Search: Interpersonal Relationships and Relational Identities of Always-Single Japanese Women Over Time. Western Journal of Communication, 76(1), 44–64.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2012.637539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Maxwell, C., & Aggleton, P. (2010). The Bubble of Privilege. Young, Privately Educated Women Talk About Social Class. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(1), 3–15.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690903385329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McCall, L. (2005). The Complexity of Intersectionality. Signs, 30(3), 1771–1800.  https://doi.org/10.1086/426800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mohammed, E. (2014). Spinster Crisis: Why 30 Year Old UAE Women Are Still Single. Middle East.Google Scholar
  57. Morris, W. L., DePaulo, B. M., Hertel, J., & Taylor, L. C. (2008). Singlism – Another Problem That Has No Name: Prejudice, Stereotypes, and Discrimination Against Singles. In M. A. Morrison & T. G. Morrison (Eds.), The psychology of modern prejudice (pp. 165–194). New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  58. Nock, S. L., Wright, J. D., & Sanchez, L. (2002). A Solution to America’s Divorce Problem. In M. Coleman & L. Ganong (Eds.), Points & Counterpoints: Controversial Relationship and Family Issues in the 21st Century. Los Angeles: CA: Roxbury.Google Scholar
  59. Olidort, J. (2008). The UAE Marriage Fund: Addressing Marriage Mores with a Traditional Remedy. Middle East Youth Initiative.Google Scholar
  60. Palmore, E. (1999). Ageism: Negative and Positive. New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  61. Parken, A. (2010). A Multi-strand Approach to Promoting Equalities and Human Rights in Policy Making. Policy & Politics, 38(1), 79–99.  https://doi.org/10.1332/030557309X445690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. PCO. (2002). Tabulations of the 2000 Census of China. Beijing: China Statistics Press.Google Scholar
  63. PCO. (2011). Tabulations of the 2010 Census of China. Beijing: China Statistics Press.Google Scholar
  64. Sakai, J. (2003). Makeinu No Toboe [Howl of the Loser Dogs]. Tokyo: Kodansha.Google Scholar
  65. Shields, S. A. (2008). Gender: An Intersectionality Perspective. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 301–311.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9501-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Shorter-Gooden, K. (2004). Multiple Resistance Strategies: How African American Women Cope with Racism and Sexism. Journal of Black Psychology, 30(3), 406–425.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798404266050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Smith, D. E. (1993). The Standard North-American Family – SNAF as an Ideological Code. Journal of Family Issues, 14(1), 50–65.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x93014001005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sokolová, V., & Kolářová, K. (2007). Gender and Generation in Mutual Perspective. In K. Kolářová & V. Sokolová (Eds.), Gender and Generation: Interdisciplinary Intersections and Perspectives (pp. 1–20). Prague: Litteraria Pragensia.Google Scholar
  69. Spielmann, S. S., MacDonald, G., Maxwell, J. A., Joel, S., Peragine, D., Muise, A., et al. (2013). Settling for Less Out of Fear of Being Single. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(6), 1049–1073.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Thornton, A., & Fricke, T. E. (1987). Social Change and the Family: Comparative Perspectives from the West, China, and South Asia. Paper Presented at the Sociological Forum.Google Scholar
  71. Thornton, A., & Young-DeMarco, L. (2001). Four Decades of Trends in Attitudes Toward Family Issues in the United States: The 1960s Through the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(4), 1009–1037.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.01009.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ting, K. f., & Chiu, S. W. (2002). Leaving the Parental Home: Chinese Culture in an Urban Context. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(3), 614–626.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00614.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. To, S. (2013). Understanding Sheng Nu (“Leftover Women”): The Phenomenon of Late Marriage Among Chinese Professional Women. Symbolic Interaction, 36(1), 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Traister, R. (2016). All the Single Ladies: Unmarried Women and the Rise of an Independent Nation. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  75. Wang, X., & Nehring, D. (2014). Individualization as an Ambition: Mapping the Dating Landscape in Beijing. Modern China, 40(6), 578–604.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0097700413517618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Woodhams, C., Lupton, B., & Cowling, M. (2015). The Presence of Ethnic Minority and Disabled Men in Feminised Work: Intersectionality, Vertical Segregation and the Glass Escalator. Sex Roles, 72(7–8), 277–293.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0427-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Yang, G., Li, Q., Wang, C., Hsia, J., Yang, Y., Xiao, L., et al. (2010). Findings from 2010 Global Adult Tobacco Survey: Implementation of MPOWER Policy in China. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 23(6), 422–429.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-3988(11)60002-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Yeung, W.-J. J., & Cheung, A. K.-L. (2015). Living Alone: One-Person Households in Asia. Demographic Research, S15(40), 1099–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Intersectionality and Feminist Politics. European Journal of Womens Studies, 13(3), 193–209.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Zhang, Q. F. (2004). Economic Transition and New Patterns of Parent-Adult Child Coresidence in Urban China. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(5), 1231–1245.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00089.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zhang, N. J., Guo, M., & Zheng, X. (2012). China: Awakening Giant Developing Solutions to Population Aging. Gerontologist, 52(5), 589–596.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gns105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.City University of Hong KongHong KongChina
  2. 2.Guangdong University of Foreign StudiesGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations

Cite chapter

Buy options