Advertisement

A Political Sociology to Compare Regionalisms: The Intellectual Legacy

  • Kevin Parthenay
Chapter

Abstract

New light on the study of regionalisms is shed through a specific epistemological stance which emerged as an extension of international relations debates as well as from public policy analysis, particularly promoted by French scholars. The political sociology of regionalism comes at the confluence of these two blocs of literature. This chapter looks back on those legacies.

Keywords

Sociology of international relations Public policy analysis Socio-historical analysis Sociology of international organizations Sociology of EU studies 

References

  1. Adler, E., & Pouliot, V. (Eds.). (2011). International Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Adler-Nissen, R. (2012). Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Adler-Nissen, R. (2016). Towards a Practice Turn in EU Studies: The Everyday of European Integration. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 54, 87–103.Google Scholar
  4. Adler-Nissen, R., & Pouliot, V. (2014). Power in Practice: Negotiating the International Intervention in Libya. European Journal of International Relations, 20(4), 889–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allison, G. (1972). Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  6. Bach, D. (2016). Regionalism in Africa: Genealogies, Institutions and Trans-State Networks. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Barnett, M., & Finnemore, M. (2004). Rules for the World International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Beeson, M. (2005). Rethinking Regionalism: Europe and East Asia in Comparative Historical Perspective. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(6), 969–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beeson, M., & Stubbs, R. (2012). Routledge Handbook of Asian Regionalism. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bigo, D. (2006). Une sociologie politique des processus d’européanisation en constitution? In Les formes de l’activité politique: Éléments d’analyse sociologique (XVIIIe-XXe siècle) (pp. 269–276). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buchet de Neuilly Yves. (2005). L’Europe de la politique étrangère. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
  12. Buton, F., & Mariot, N. (Eds.). (2009). Pratiques et méthodes de la socio-histoire. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, coll. « CURAPP ».Google Scholar
  13. Courty, G. (2011). La sociologie politique des groupes d’intérêt et la construction européenne. Fare. Frontières, Acteurs et Représentations de l’Europe, “Patronats et Europe”, n°1, 93–111. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00995863/document
  14. Déloye, Y. (2006). Introduction: éléments pour une approche socio-historique de la construction européenne: Un premier état des lieux. Politique européenne, 18(1), 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deutsch, K. (1957). Political Community and the North Atlantic Area. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Devin, G. (2009). Sociologie des relations internationales. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  17. Devin, G. (2013). Paroles de diplomates: Comment les négociations multilatérales changent la diplomatie. In Négociations internationales (pp. 77–104). Paris: Presses de Sciences Po (P.F.N.S.P.).Google Scholar
  18. Elias, N. (1981). Qu’est-ce que la sociologie? Paris: Pandora, 1970.Google Scholar
  19. Elias, N. (1985). La société de cour. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  20. Eymeri-Douzans, J.-M., & Georgakakis, D. (2008). Les hauts fonctionnaires de l’Europe. In C. Belot, P. Magnette, & S. Saurugger (Eds.), Science politique de l’Europe. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
  21. Favell, A. (2008). Eurostars and Eurocities: Free Movement and Mobility in an Integrating Europe. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Favell, A., & Guiraudon, V. (2009). The sociology of the European Union: An agenda. European Union Politics, SAGE Publications, 10(4), 550–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fawcett, L. (2004). Exploring Regional Domains: A Comparative History of Regionalism. International Affairs, 80, 429–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fawcett, L. (2012). The History and Concept of Regionalism. European Society of International Law (ESIL), Conference Paper Series No. 4/2012. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2193746
  25. Fligstein, N. (2008). Euroclash: The EU, European Identity and the Future of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Fort, B. (Ed.), Webber, D. (Ed.), & Higgott, R. (2006). Regional Integration in East Asia and Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Fouilleux, E. (2003). La politique agricole commune et ses réformes: une politique européenne à l’épreuve de la globalisation. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  28. Georgakakis, D. (Ed.). (2013). Le champ de l’Eurocratie. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
  29. Georgakakis Didier, & De Lassalle, M. (2007). Genèse et structure d’un capital institutionnel européen: Les très hauts fonctionnaires de la Commission européenne. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 166–167(1), 38–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Georgakakis, D., & Eymeri-Douzans, J. M. (2008). Les hauts fonctionnaires de l’Union européenne. In C. Belot, P. Magnette, & S. Saurugger (Eds.), Science politique de l’Europe. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
  31. Haas, E. (1958). The Uniting of Europe. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Halpern, C. (2009). Politiques publiques. In Dictionnaire des mouvements sociaux (pp. 429–437). Paris: Presses de Sciences Po (P.F.N.S.P.).Google Scholar
  33. Hassenteufel, P. (2009). Sociologie politique: l’action publique. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  34. Joana, J., & Smith, A. (2002). Les commissaires européens: Technocrates, diplomates ou politiques? Paris: Presses de Sciences Po (P.F.N.S.P.).Google Scholar
  35. Jones, C. (1970). An Introduction to the Study of Public Policy. Belmont: Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
  36. Klausen, J., & Tilly, L. (1996). European Integration in Social and Historical Perspective: 1850 to the Present. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  37. Koch, M., & Stetter, S. (2013). Sociological Perspectives on International Organizations and the Construction of Global Order – An Introduction. Journal of International Organizations Studies, 4, Special Issue “Sociological Perspectives on International Organizations and the Construction of Global Order”, 4–13.Google Scholar
  38. Kott, S. (2011). Les organisations internationales, terrains d’étude de la globalisation. Jalons pour une approche socio-historique. Critique internationale, 52(3), 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lascoumes, P., & Le Galès, P. (dir.). (2007). Gouverner par les instruments. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
  40. Lascoumes, P., & Le Galès P. (2012). Sociologie de l’action publique (2e édition), Paris: Armand Colin, coll., 128.Google Scholar
  41. Le Galès, P., & Thatcher, M. (1995). Les Réseaux de politiques publiques, Débat autour des policy networks. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  42. Le Galès, P., & Lascoumes, P. (Eds.). (2004). Gouverner par les instruments. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
  43. Marsh, D., & Rhodes, R. (Eds.). (1992). Policy Networks in British Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  44. Mattheis, F. (2014). New Regionalism in the South – Mercosur and SADC in a Comparative and Interregional Perspective. Leibniz: Leibniz University Press.Google Scholar
  45. McCormick, J. (2001). Environmental Policy in the European. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mény, Y., Muller, P., & Quermonne J.-L. (Eds.) (1995). Politiques publiques en Europe. Paris: L’Harmattan, Coll. Logiques politiques.Google Scholar
  47. Mérand, F. (2006). Social Representations in the European Security and Defence Policy. Cooperation and Conflict, 41(2), 131–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Michel, H. (2006). Lobbyistes et lobbying de l’Union européenne. In Trajectoires, formations et pratiques des représentants d’intérêts. Strasbourg: Presse Universitaire de.Google Scholar
  49. Nay, O., & Petiteville, F. (2011). Éléments pour une sociologie du changement dans les organisations internationals. Critique internationale, 53(4), 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ness, G., & Brechin, S. (1988). Bridging the Gap: International Organizations as Organizations. International Organization, 42(2), 245–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Noiriel, G. (2008). Introduction à la socio-histoire. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  52. Pierson, P. (1996). The Path to European Integration. A Historical Institutionalist Analysis. Comparative Political Studies, 29(2), 123–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pouliot, V. (2008). The Logic of Practicality: A Theory of Practice of Security Communities. International Organization, 62(2), 257–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pouliot, V. (2016). International Pecking Orders: The Politics and Practice of Multilateral Diplomacy. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Radaelli, C. (2010). Européanisation. In Dictionnaire des politiques publiques: 4e édition précédée d’un nouvel avant-propos (pp. 247–257). Paris: Presses de Sciences Po (P.F.N.S.P.).Google Scholar
  56. Robert, C., & Vauchez, A. (2010). L’Académie européenne: Savoirs, experts et savants dans le gouvernement de l’Europe. Politix, 89(1), 9–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rumford, C. (2002). The European Union: A Political Sociology. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sabatier, P., & Jenkins-Smith, H. (Eds.). (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  59. Saurugger, S. (2009). Théories et concept de l’intégration européenne, coll. Références gouvernances, Paris: Les Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
  60. Slaughter, A.-M. (2003). A New World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Smith, A. (2004). Le gouvernement de l’Union européenne. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar
  62. Smith, A. (2010). Le gouvernement de l’Union européenne : une sociologie politique. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar
  63. Söderbaum, F. (2016). Rethinking Regionalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Teisman, G. (2000). Models for Research into Decision-Making Processes: On Phases, Streams and Decision-Making Rounds. Public Administration, 78, 937–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Union of International Associations. (2009). Yearbook of International Organizations 2009–2010 – Vol 1: Organization Descriptions and Cross-References (Vol. 1, 46th ed.). KG Saur Verlag.Google Scholar
  66. Vauchez, A. (2013). L’Union par le droit: L’invention d’un programme institutionnel pour l’Europe. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po (P.F.N.S.P.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wunderlich, J.-U. (2013). Regionalism Globalisation and International Order Europe and Southeast Asia. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin Parthenay
    • 1
  1. 1.Sciences PoParisFrance

Personalised recommendations