Advertisement

Anterior Cranio-Cervical Approach: Transnasal

  • Chikezie I. EseonuEmail author
  • Gary Gallia
  • Masaru Ishii
Chapter

Abstract

Anterior and anterolateral cranio-cervical lesions present challenging operative cases given their proximity to vital neurovascular structures. Several pathologies can affect the cranio-cervical junction (CCJ) including neoplasms, rheumatologic disease, fibroconnective tissue disease, congenital disease, infections, and traumatic and degenerative disorders. Numerous approaches have been employed to gain access to this region, including the transcervical, transnasal, transoral, and variations of the far-lateral approach. The transnasal approach for the cranio-cervical region provides an alternative approach that allows for good visualization of the CCJ while limiting the number of complications. The use of endoscopy for the transnasal approach provides a panoramic view that can provide improved lighting and resolution compared to the operative microscope. It also provides direct access to the anterior and anterolateral CCJ without needing to mobilize the surrounding neurovasculature. This chapter describes the transnasal surgical approach to the anterior cranio-cervical junction.

Keywords

Cranio-cervical junction Transnasal Endoscopy Transclival Clivus Cranio-vertebral Endonasal Nasopalatine line Naso-axial line Chordoma 

References

  1. 1.
    Fujii T, Platt A, Zada G. Endoscopic endonasal approaches to the craniovertebral junction: a systematic review of the literature. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2015;76(6):480–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee A, Sommer D, Reddy K, Murty N, Gunnarsson T. Endoscopic transnasal approach to the craniocervical junction. Skull Base. 2010;20(3):199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ponce-Gomez JA, Ortega-Porcayo LA, Soriano-Baron HE, Sotomayor-Gonzalez A, Arriada-Mendicoa N, Gomez-Amador JL, et al. Evolution from microscopic transoral to endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;37(4):E15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yu Y, Hu F, Zhang X, Ge J, Sun C. Endoscopic transnasal odontoidectomy combined with posterior reduction to treat basilar invagination: technical note. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19(5):637–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hankinson TC, Grunstein E, Gardner P, Spinks TJ, Anderson RC. Transnasal odontoid resection followed by posterior decompression and occipitocervical fusion in children with Chiari malformation Type I and ventral brainstem compression. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2010;5(6):549–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Patel AJ, Boatey J, Muns J, Bollo RJ, Whitehead WE, Giannoni CM, et al. Endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy in a child with chronic type 3 atlantoaxial rotatory fixation: case report and literature review. Childs Nerv Syst. 2012;28(11):1971–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kassam AB, Snyderman C, Gardner P, Carrau R, Spiro R. The expanded endonasal approach: a fully endoscopic transnasal approach and resection of the odontoid process: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(1 Suppl):E213; discussion E213.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eseonu CI, ReFaey K, Rincon-Torroella J, Garcia O, Wand GS, Salvatori R, et al. Endoscopic versus microscopic transsphenoidal approach for pituitary adenomas: comparison of outcomes during the transition of methods of a single surgeon. World Neurosurg. 2017;97:317–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cavallo LM, Cappabianca P, Messina A, Esposito F, Stella L, de Divitiis E, et al. The extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the clivus and cranio-vertebral junction: anatomical study. Childs Nerv Syst. 2007;23(6):665–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alfieri A, Jho HD, Tschabitscher M. Endoscopic endonasal approach to the ventral cranio-cervical junction: anatomical study. Acta Neurochir. 2002;144(3):219–25. discussion 225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kshettry VR, Thorp BD, Shriver MF, Zanation AM, Woodard TD, Sindwani R, et al. Endoscopic approaches to the craniovertebral junction. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2016;49(1):213–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    de Almeida JR, Zanation AM, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM, Gardner PA, et al. Defining the nasopalatine line: the limit for endonasal surgery of the spine. Laryngoscope. 2009;119(2):239–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baird CJ, Conway JE, Sciubba DM, Prevedello DM, Quinones-Hinojosa A, Kassam AB. Radiographic and anatomic basis of endoscopic anterior craniocervical decompression: a comparison of endonasal, transoral, and transcervical approaches. Neurosurgery. 2009;65(6 Suppl):158–63; discussion 63-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Aldana PR, Naseri I, La Corte E. The naso-axial line: a new method of accurately predicting the inferior limit of the endoscopic endonasal approach to the craniovertebral junction. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(2 Suppl Operative):ons308–14; discussion ons314.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Atlas G, Lee M. The neural integrity monitor electromyogram tracheal tube: anesthetic considerations. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013;29(3):403–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Laufer I, Greenfield JP, Anand VK, Hartl R, Schwartz TH. Endonasal endoscopic resection of the odontoid process in a nonachondroplastic dwarf with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: feasibility of the approach and utility of the intraoperative Iso-C three-dimensional navigation. Case report. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008;8(4):376–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zoli M, Milanese L, Bonfatti R, Faustini-Fustini M, Marucci G, Tallini G, et al. Clival chordomas: considerations after 16 years of endoscopic endonasal surgery. J Neurosurg. 2018;128:329–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Panjabi M, Dvorak J, Crisco JJ 3rd, Oda T, Wang P, Grob D. Effects of alar ligament transection on upper cervical spine rotation. J Orthop Res. 1991;9(4):584–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Panjabi M, Dvorak J, Crisco J 3rd, Oda T, Hilibrand A, Grob D. Flexion, extension, and lateral bending of the upper cervical spine in response to alar ligament transections. J Spinal Disord. 1991;4(2):157–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL, Mataza JC, Kassam A, Snyderman CH, et al. A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope. 2006;116(10):1882–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kassam AB, Thomas A, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Vescan A, Prevedello D, et al. Endoscopic reconstruction of the cranial base using a pedicled nasoseptal flap. Neurosurgery. 2008;63(1 Suppl 1):ONS44–52; discussion ONS52–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fang CH, Friedman R, Schild SD, Goldstein IM, Baredes S, Liu JK, et al. Purely endoscopic endonasal surgery of the craniovertebral junction: a systematic review. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2015;5(8):754–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Padhye V, Valentine R, Wormald PJ. Management of carotid artery injury in endonasal surgery. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;18(Suppl 2):S173–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Solares CA, Ong YK, Carrau RL, Fernandez-Miranda J, Prevedello DM, Snyderman CH, et al. Prevention and management of vascular injuries in endoscopic surgery of the sinonasal tract and skull base. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2010;43(4):817–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A, Gardner P, Carrau RL. Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part II. Posterior clinoids to the foramen magnum. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19(1):E4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mazzatenta D, Zoli M, Mascari C, Pasquini E, Frank G. Endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy: clinical series. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(10):846–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Messina A, Bruno MC, Decq P, Coste A, Cavallo LM, de Divittis E, et al. Pure endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy: anatomical study. Neurosurg Rev. 2007;30(3):189–94; discussion 194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Eseonu CI, ReFaey K, Pamias-Portalatin E, Asensio J, Garcia O, Boahene K, et al. Three-hand endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: experience with an anatomy-preserving mononostril approach technique. Oper Neuros. 2017;14:158–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chikezie I. Eseonu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gary Gallia
    • 2
  • Masaru Ishii
    • 3
  1. 1.Johns Hopkins Hospital, Department of NeurosurgeryBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Johns Hopkins University, Department of NeurosurgeryBaltimoreUSA
  3. 3.Johns Hopkins University, Department of OtolaryngologyBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations