The Metaphysics of Domains
- 137 Downloads
Pluralist theories of various sorts commit themselves to the notion of a domain, but what exactly is a domain? In this chapter, I aim to answer this question. I begin by suggesting that the notion of a domain is not exclusive to pluralist theories and is implicit in a number of different philosophical views. I then outline both the semantic and metaphysical aspects of a domain before considering two problems associated with domain individuation that have been posed for truth pluralism: the problem of mixed atomics and the problem of mixed compounds. I show how solutions to each problem drop out of the account of domains given.
KeywordsTruth Pluralism Domains Properties Objects Predicates Singular terms Sparse properties Abundant properties Mixed atomics Mixed compounds Mixed conjunctions
- Armstrong, D.M. 1978. Universals and Scientific Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- ———. 2014. Properties. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Gamester, W. Forthcoming. Logic, Logical Form, and the Disunity of Truth. Analysis.Google Scholar
- Kim, S., and Nikolaj J.L.L. Pedersen. 2018. Strong Truth Pluralism. In Pluralisms in Truth and Logic, ed. Nikolaj J.L.L. Pedersen, Jeremy Wyatt, and Nathan Kellen. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Mackie, J.L. 1977. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Pedersen, Nikolaj J.L.L., and M.P. Lynch. 2018. Truth Pluralism. In The Oxford Handbook of Truth, ed. M. Glanzberg. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Pedersen, Nikolaj J.L.L., and C.D. Wright 2013. Pluralist Theories of Truth. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. E.N. Zalta, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2013/entries/truth-pluralist/.
- Smith, M. 1994. The Moral Problem. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Williams, B. 1985. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Wright, C.J.G. 1983. Frege’s Conception of Numbers as Objects. Vol. 2. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar