Advertisement

Is Laboratory Data Helpful in the Workup of Chronic Abdominal Pain?

  • Janet Smereck
Chapter

Abstract

The selective use of laboratory testing may help determine the acuity of a chronic abdominal complaint, detect previously overlooked causes of a chronic abdominal pain syndrome, or reveal a new disease process unrelated to the chronic condition. Choice of testing should focus on the specific issues being investigated. Pregnancy testing in female patients of childbearing age and urinalysis for pyuria (infectious or sterile) or hematuria may demonstrate or rule out important diagnoses. Inflammatory markers such as the white blood cell count (WBC) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are of low discriminatory value as a screening test in patients with abdominal pain. Leukocytosis is only seen in about half of all patients with acute abdominal pathology, and a WBC or CRP within reference range does not rule out an urgent condition. An elevated lactate, a marker for disease severity, has high sensitivity for mesenteric ischemia. When evaluating the patient with chronically recurring abdominal pain, the emergency clinician is advised to make selective use of high-yield laboratory data and avoid a “shotgun” approach.

Keywords

Pregnancy testing Sterile pyuria Leukocytosis C-reactive protein 

References

  1. 1.
    Gans S, Pols M, Stoker J, Boermeester M. Guideline for the diagnostic pathway in patients with acute abdominal pain. Dig Surg. 2015;32(1):23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Olshaker J. Emergency department pregnancy testing. J Emerg Med. 1996;14(1):59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ramoska E, Sacchetti A, Nepp M. Reliability of patient history in determining the possibility of pregnancy. Ann Emerg Med. 1989;18(1):48–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Strote J, Chen G. Patient self assessment of pregnancy status in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2006;23(7):554–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lazarenko G, Dobson C, Enokson R, Brant R. Accuracy and speed of urine pregnancy tests done in the emergency department: a prospective study. CJEM. 2001;3(4):292–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gottlieb M, Wnek K, Moskoff J, Christian E, Bailitz J. Comparison of result times between urine and whole blood point-of-care pregnancy testing. West J Emerg Med. 2016;17(4):449–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Committee on Gynecologic Practice. Avoiding inappropriate clinical decisions based on false-positive human chorionic gonatropin test. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 278, November 2002, reaffirmed 2017. Accessed online 11/2/2017.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Young G. CBC or not CBC? That is the question. Ann Emerg Med. 1986;15(3):367–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gans S, Atema J, Stoker J, Toorenvliet BR, Laurell H, Boermeester MA. C-reactive protein and white blood cell count as triage test between urgent and nonurgent conditions in 2961 patients with acute abdominal pain. Open Access Med. 2015;94(9):1–9.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nagurney J, Brown D, Chang Y, Sane S, Wang AC, Weiner JB. Use of diagnostic testing in the emergency department for patients presenting with non-traumatic abdominal pain. J Emerg Med. 2003;25(4):363–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goonewardene S, Persad R. Sterile pyuria: a forgotten entity. Ther Adv Urol. 2015;7(5):295–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Conley S, Frumkin K. Acute lobar nephronia: a case report and literature review. J Emerg Med. 2014;46(5):624–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Policha A, Lamparello P, Sadek M, Berland T, Maldonado T. Endovascular treatment of nutcracker syndrome. Ann Vasc Surg. 2016;36:e1–295e7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kelada E, Jones A. Interstitial cystitis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2007;275(4):223–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gomes C, Sanchez-Ortiz R, Harris C, Wein AJ, Rovner ES. Significance of hematuria in patients with interstitial cystitis: review of radiographic and endoscopic findings. Urology. 2001;57(2):262–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fargo M, Grogan S, Saguil A. Evaluation of jaundice in adults. Am Fam Physician. 2017;95(3):164–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hameed A, Lam V, Pleass H. Significant elevations of serum lipase not caused by pancreatitis: a systemic review. HPB (Oxford). 2015;17(2):99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Duggan S, Chonchubhair H, Lawal O, O’Connor DB, Conlon KC. Chronic pancreatitis: a diagnostic dilemma. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(7):2304–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Andersen L, Mackenhauer J, Roberts J, Berg KM, Cocchi MN, Donnino MW. Etiology and therapeutic approach to elevated lactate. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014;88(10):1127–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Herrick A, McColl K. Acute intermittent porphyria. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2005;19(2):235–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Karim Z, Lyoumi S, Nicholas G, Deybach JC, Gouya L, Puy H. Porphyrias: a 2015 update. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2015;39(4):412–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu Y, Lien W, Fang C, Lai TI, Chen WJ, Wang HP. ED presentation of acute porphyria. Am J Emerg Med. 2005;23:164–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tsai M, Huang S, Cheng S. Lead poisoning can be easily misdiagnosed as acute porphyria and nonspecific abdominal pain. Case Rep Emerg Med. 2017; ID 9050713, 4 pages. Accessed online 01/19/2018.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janet Smereck
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Emergency MedicineMedStar Georgetown University HospitalWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations