Advertisement

What Is the Best Risk Stratification Tool for a Patient with a Suspected Upper GI Bleed?

  • Ainsley Adams
  • Andrew C. MeltzerEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Initial management for upper GI bleeding should always focus on hemodynamic resuscitation prior to risk stratification. Once resuscitation has begun, the three most commonly used risk stratification tools are the Glasgow-Blatchford Score (GBS), the Rockall score, and the AIM65. The GBS has been validated as a tool to discharge patients from the ED for outpatient upper endoscopy. The Rockall score and the AIM65 are most helpful when deciding if the patient needs an intensive care setting and predicting mortality and for stratifying urgency of endoscopy. Lactate and lactate clearance after resuscitation may also be used as a predictor of patient outcomes in the setting of an upper GI bleed. There are no validated clinical decision tools for risk stratification of lower GI bleeding.

Keywords

Glasgow-Blatchford Score (GBS) Rockall score AIM65 

References

  1. 1.
    Robertson M, Majumdar A, Boyapati R, et al. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83(6):1151–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, Northfield TC. Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Gut. 1996;38(3):316–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vreeburg EM, Terwee CB, Snel P, et al. Validation of the Rockall risk scoring system in upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Gut. 1999;44(3):331–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tham TCK, James C, Kelly M. Predicting outcome of acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage without endoscopy using the clinical Rockall score. Postgrad Med J. 2006;82(973):757–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blatchford O, Murray WR, Blatchford M. A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Lancet (London, England). 2000;356(9238):1318–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gralnek IM, Dulai GS. Incremental value of upper endoscopy for triage of patients with acute non-variceal upper-GI hemorrhage. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60(1):9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schiefer M, Aquarius M, Leffers P, et al. Predictive validity of the Glasgow Blatchford Bleeding Score in an unselected emergency department population in continental Europe. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;1(4):382–7.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gralnek IM. Outpatient management of “low-risk” nonvariceal upper GI hemorrhage. Are we ready to put evidence into practice? Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55(1):131–4.  https://doi.org/10.1067/mge.2002.120661.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stanley AJ, Laine L, Dalton HR, et al. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study. BMJ. 2017;356:i6432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bryant RV, Kuo P, Williamson K, et al. Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78(4):576–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Meltzer AC, Pinchbeck C, Burnett S, et al. Emergency physicians accurately interpret video capsule endoscopy findings in suspected upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a video survey. Lewis L, ed. Acad Emerg Med. 2013;20(7):711–715.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Saltzman JR, Tabak YP, Hyett BH, Sun X, Travis AC, Johannes RS. A simple risk score accurately predicts in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and cost in acute upper GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74(6):1215–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yaka E, Yılmaz S, Özgür Doğan N, Pekdemir M. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department. Mark Courtney D, ed. Acad Emerg Med. 2015;22(1):22–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Meltzer AC, Burnett S, Pinchbeck C, et al. Pre-endoscopic Rockall and Blatchford scores to identify which emergency department patients with suspected gastrointestinal bleed do not need endoscopic hemostasis. J Emerg Med. 2013;44(6):1083–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Westhoff JL, Holt KR. Gastrointestinal bleeding: an evidence-based ED approach to risk stratification. Emerg Med Pract. 2004;6(3):1–20.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    El-Kersh K, Chaddha U, Sinha RS, Saad M, Guardiola J, Cavallazzi R. Predictive role of admission lactate level in critically ill patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. J Emerg Med. 2015;49(3):318–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shah A, Chisolm-Straker M, Alexander A, Rattu M, Dikdan S, Manini AF. Prognostic use of lactate to predict inpatient mortality in acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Am J Emerg Med. 2014;32(7):752–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wada T, Hagiwara A, Uemura T, Yahagi N, Kimura A. Early lactate clearance for predicting active bleeding in critically ill patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective study. Intern Emerg Med. 2016;11(5):737–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Emergency MedicineGeorge Washington University School of Medicine & Health SciencesWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations