Advertisement

Country Development Stage and the Level of Corporate Social Disclosure

  • Simone R. BarakatEmail author
  • Greici Sarturi
  • Keysa Manuela Cunha de Mascena
Chapter
Part of the AIB Latin America book series (AIBLAT)

Abstract

This chapter aims to investigate the association between the country’s development stage and the level of corporate social disclosure of firms operating in these countries. The theoretical background includes a discussion on corporate social responsibility (CSR), corporate social disclosure (CSD) and the influence of country on CSR and CSD. We tested our research hypotheses using the five stages of development presented in the Global Competitiveness Report (GCR) and the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) reports of 144 countries. The findings confirm the hypotheses that there is a relationship between countries’ stages of development and the disclosure level of these countries. Our results show that countries in the first stages of development present a lower level of CSD, countries in middle stages are associated with average levels of CSD, and countries in the advanced stage present higher levels of CSD. We explain this association based on institutional issues and stakeholder pressures. Our chapter contributes to the understanding of the factors that may influence differences in disclosure among countries. Since most studies about CSD focus on characteristics at the firm level such as size, industry, and managers’ motivations, our study contributes by presenting evidence on the macro level.

Keywords

Disclosure Country Development stage 

References

  1. Abreu, M.C.S.D., L.T.D. Cunha, and C.Y. Barlow. 2015. Institutional dynamics and organizations affecting the adoption of sustainable development in the United Kingdom and Brazil. Business Ethics: A European Review 24 (1): 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acs, Z.J., S. Desai, and J. Hessels. 2008. Entrepreneurship, economic development and institutions. Small Business Economics 31 (3): 219–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aerts, W., D. Cormier, and M. Magnan. 2008. Corporate environmental disclosure, financial markets and the media: An international perspective. Ecological Economics 64 (3): 643–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aguinis, H., and A. Glavas. 2012. What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility a review and research agenda. Journal of Management 38 (4): 932–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Al-Tuwaijri, S.A., T.E. Christensen, and K.E. Hughes. 2004. The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: A simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society 29 (5): 447–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, J.L. 2006. Institutional analysis and the paradox of corporate social responsibility. The American Behavioral Scientist 49 (7): 925–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carroll, A.B. 1979. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review 4 (4): 497–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ———. 1991. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons 34 (4): 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. ———. 2008. A history of corporate social responsibility. In The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility, ed. A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, and D.S. Siegel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cheng, B., I. Ioannou, and G. Serafeim. 2014. Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal 35 (1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cuevas-Mejía, J.J., S. Maldonado-García, and N. Escobar-Váquiro. 2013. Aproximación a los factores que influyen en la divulgación de información sobre RSC en empresas de América Latina. Cuadernos de contabilidad 14 (34): 91–131.Google Scholar
  12. De Bakker, F.G., P. Groenewegen, and F. Den Hond. 2005. A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business & Society 44 (3): 283–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Villiers, C., and A. Marques. 2016. Corporate social responsibility, country-level predispositions, and the consequences of choosing a level of disclosure. Accounting and Business Research 46 (2): 167–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dhaliwal, D.S., S. Radhakrishnan, A. Tsang, and Y.G. Yang. 2012. Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: International evidence on corporate social responsibility disclosure. The Accounting Review 87 (3): 723–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dilling, P.F. 2010. Sustainability reporting in a global context: What are the characteristics of corporations that provide high quality sustainability reports-an empirical analysis. The International Business & Economics Research Journal 9 (1): 19–30.Google Scholar
  16. Elkington, J. 1997. Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century. Oxford: Capstone Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Ernstberger, J., and M. Grüning. 2013. How do firm-and country-level governance mechanisms affect firms’ disclosure? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 32 (3): 50–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fifka, M.S., and M. Pobizhan. 2014. An institutional approach to corporate social responsibility in Russia. Journal of Cleaner Production 82: 192–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frías-Aceituno, J.V., L. Rodríguez-Ariza, and I.M. García-Sánchez. 2013. Is integrated reporting determined by a country’s legal system? An exploratory study. Journal of Cleaner Production 44: 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. García-Sánchez, I.M., L. Rodríguez-Ariza, and J.V. Frías-Aceituno. 2013. The cultural system and integrated reporting. International Business Review 22 (5): 828–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. GRI. 2015. Global reporting initiative. Retrieved from https://www.globalreporting.org/Pages/default.aspx
  22. Hair, J.F., W.C. Black, B.J. Babin, R.E. Anderson, and R.L. Tatham. 2006. Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 6). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  23. Haniffa, R.M., and T.E. Cooke. 2005. The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 24 (5): 391–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hofstede, G. 1984. National cultures revisited. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 2 (1): 22–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Husted, B.W., and J. de Jesus Salazar. 2006. Taking Friedman seriously: Maximizing profits and social performance. Journal of Management Studies 43 (1): 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jamali, D. 2007. The case for strategic corporate social responsibility in developing countries. Business & Society Review 112 (1): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones, T.M. 1980. Corporate social responsibility revisited, redefined. California Management Review 22 (3): 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. KPMG. 2011. International survey of corporate social responsibility reporting. Retrieved from http://www.kpmg.com/PT/pt/IssuesAndInsights/Documents/corporate-responsibility2011.pdf
  29. Lockett, A., J. Moon, and W. Visser. 2006. Corporate social responsibility in management research: Focus, nature, salience and sources of influence. Journal of Management Studies 43 (1): 115–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mallin, C.A., and G. Michelon. 2011. Board reputation attributes and corporate social performance: An empirical investigation of the US best corporate citizens. Accounting and Business Research 41 (2): 119–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Martin, R.L. 2002. The virtue matrix: Calculating the return on corporate responsibility. Harvard Business Review 80 (3): 68–75.Google Scholar
  32. McWilliams, A., and D. Siegel. 2001. Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review 26 (1): 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McWilliams, A., D.S. Siegel, and P.M. Wright. 2006. Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies 43 (1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Michalos, A.C. 1997. Issues for business ethics in the nineties and beyond. Journal of Business ethics 16 (3): 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nalband, N.A., and M.S. Al-Amri. 2013. Corporate social responsibility: Perception, practices and performance of listed companies of Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal incorporating Journal of Global Competitiveness 23 (3): 284–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Naser, K., A. Al-Hussaini, D. Al-Kwari, and R. Nuseibeh. 2006. Determinants of corporate social disclosure in developing countries: The case of Qatar. Advances in International Accounting 19: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Norman, W., and C. MacDonald. 2004. Getting to the bottom of “triple bottom line”. Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (02): 243–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Orij, R. 2010. Corporate social disclosures in the context of national cultures and stakeholder theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 23 (7): 868–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Patten, D.M. 1991. Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 10 (4): 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. ———. 2002. The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society 27 (8): 763–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Porter, M.E. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review 68 (2): 73–93.Google Scholar
  42. Porter, M.E., and M.R. Kramer. 2006. Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review 84 (12): 78–92.Google Scholar
  43. Porter, M.E., J. Sachs, P.K. Cornelius, J.W. McArthur, and K. Schwab. 2002. The global competitiveness report 2001–2002, 16–25. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Robertson, D.C. 2009. Corporate social responsibility and different stages of economic development: Singapore, Turkey, and Ethiopia. Journal of Business Ethics 88 (4): 617–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schaltegger, S., and R.L. Burritt. 2010. Sustainability accounting for companies: Catchphrase or decision support for business leaders? Journal of World Business 45 (4): 375–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tilt, C.A. 1994. The influence of external pressure groups on corporate social disclosure: Some empirical evidence. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 7 (4): 47–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ullmann, A.A. 1985. Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of US firms. Academy of Management Review 10 (3): 540–557.Google Scholar
  48. Van der Laan Smith, J., A. Adhikari, and R.H. Tondkar. 2005. Exploring differences in social disclosures internationally: A stakeholder perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 24 (2): 123–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Van Marrewijk, M. 2003. Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2–3): 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. WEF. 2015. The global competitiveness report 2014–2015. World Economic Forum. Geneva. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2014-15.pdf
  51. Xiao, J.Z., S.S. Gao, S. Heravi, and Y.C. Cheung. 2005. The impact of social and economic development on corporate social and environmental disclosure in Hong Kong and the UK. Advances in International Accounting 18: 219–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simone R. Barakat
    • 1
    Email author
  • Greici Sarturi
    • 1
  • Keysa Manuela Cunha de Mascena
    • 2
  1. 1.Business Administration DepartmentUniversity of São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.University of FortalezaFortalezaBrazil

Personalised recommendations