ARMA(p,q) Processes

  • John D. Levendis
Part of the Springer Texts in Business and Economics book series (STBE)


A long-standing dream of economists was to build a massive model of the economy. One with hundreds of supply and demand equations. A supply and demand system for each input, intermediate good, and final product. One would only need to estimate the relevant elasticities and a few simple parameters to construct an economic crystal ball. It would be able to make accurate forecasts and useful policy prescriptions. Most economists wished this at one point. Slowly, though, the era of optimism in structural macroeconomic forecasting during the 1950s and 1960s became an era of doubt during the 1970s and 1980s.


  1. Ando, A., Modigliani, F., & Rasche, R. (1972). Appendix to part 1: Equations and definitions of variables for the FRB-MIT-Penn econometric model, November 1969. In Econometric models of cyclical behavior (Vols. 1 and 2, pp. 543–598). New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  2. Cooper, R. L. (1972). The predictive performance of quarterly econometric models of the united states. In Econometric models of cyclical behavior (Vols. 1 and 2, pp. 813–947). New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  3. Diebold, F. X. (1998). The past, present, and future of macroeconomic forecasting. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(2), 175–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Epstein, R. J. (2014). A history of econometrics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  5. Fair, R. C. (1992). The Cowles Commission approach, real business cycle theories, and New-Keynesian economics. In The business cycle: Theories and evidence (pp. 133–157). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Keele, L., & Kelly, N. J. (2005). Dynamic models for dynamic theories: The ins and outs of lagged dependent variables. Political Analysis, 14(2), 186–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lucas, R. E. (1976). Econometric policy evaluation: A critique. In Carnegie-Rochester conference series on public policy (Vol. 1, pp. 19–46). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Naylor, T. H., Seaks, T. G., & Wichern, D. W. (1972). Box-Jenkins methods: An alternative to econometric models. International Statistical Review/Revue Internationale de Statistique, 40, 123–137.Google Scholar
  9. Nelson, C. R. (1972). The prediction performance of the FRB-MIT-Penn model of the US economy. American Economic Review, 62(5), 902–917.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • John D. Levendis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsLoyola University New OrleansNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations